IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v43y2026i4p368-390.html

More than monoliths: The gendered dynamics of support for torture in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Huber

Abstract

The gender gap in support for political violence is one of the most consistent findings in foreign policy literature. Beyond gender, an individuals’ gender ideologies may also impact their reactions to terrorism and their support for torture. While support for masculine honor culture increases anger after terrorism as a perceived threat, neosexism dampens anger as violence is normalized. Yet both gender ideologies support the torture of suspected terrorists. A survey of US-based individuals finds support for these hypotheses. This study refines our understanding of the gender gap by underlining the importance of not only individual gender, but also gendered beliefs.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Huber, 2026. "More than monoliths: The gendered dynamics of support for torture in the United States," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 43(4), pages 368-390, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:43:y:2026:i:4:p:368-390
    DOI: 10.1177/07388942251370222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07388942251370222
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/07388942251370222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:43:y:2026:i:4:p:368-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.