IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v61y2025i1p46-62.html

Reconceptualising Security-development Paradigm: A Critical Analysis of Chinese ‘Development Peace Model’ in the Middle East

Author

Listed:
  • Asif Iqbal Dawar

    (Department of Peace and Conflict Studies at National Defence University (NDU), Islamabad, Pakistan. iqbaldawar@gmail.com)

Abstract

In recent years, China has emerged as a significant player in the intersection of international security and development in the Middle East. This development coincides with a decline in the enduring dominance of the US in the region’s security and development affairs. In contrast, China has pursued a cautious, impartial and novel concept of zero enemy policy with regional states. While existing research has explored Chinese economic engagement in the Middle East, literature focusing on the ‘Development Peace Model’ in relation to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) remains limited. This article aims to provide a critical analysis of how China’s pursuit of a multi-polar world order, based on principles of neutrality and partnership for promoting stability through the ‘Development Peace Model’, offers an alternative approach to ‘Liberal Democratic Peace’ in the Middle East. Furthermore, the article examines why Middle Eastern states are receptive to China’s ‘Development Peace Model’ as they seek to address their economic crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Asif Iqbal Dawar, 2025. "Reconceptualising Security-development Paradigm: A Critical Analysis of Chinese ‘Development Peace Model’ in the Middle East," China Report, , vol. 61(1), pages 46-62, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:61:y:2025:i:1:p:46-62
    DOI: 10.1177/00094455241290654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00094455241290654
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00094455241290654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohsen Shariatinia & Hamidreza Azizi, 2017. "Iran–China Cooperation in the Silk Road Economic Belt: From Strategic Understanding to Operational Understanding," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 25(5), pages 46-61, September.
    2. Wei Hu & Yue Shan & Yun Deng & Ningning Fu & Jian Duan & Haining Jiang & Jianzhen Zhang, 2023. "Geopolitical Risk Evolution and Obstacle Factors of Countries along the Belt and Road and Its Types Classification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Jo Beall & Thomas Goodfellow & James Putzel, 2006. "Introductory article: on the discourse of terrorism, security and development," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 51-67.
    4. Rozana Himaz, 2021. "Challenges associated with the BRI: a review of recent economics literature," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7-8), pages 512-526, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sielker Franziska & Dannenberg Peter, 2025. "New economic geographies of war: risks and disruptions in Eurasian transport routes and supply chains through the military conflict in Ukraine," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 69(1), pages 41-54.
    2. Chen, Jiyong & Liu, Yishuang & Liu, Wei, 2020. "Investment facilitation and China's outward foreign direct investment along the belt and road," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    3. López, C. & Morales-Contreras, M.F. & Langella, I.M. & Alonso-Monge, J., 2025. "Modeling supply chain disruptions due to geopolitical Reasons: A systematic literature review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Paul Bezerra & Alex Braithwaite, 2016. "Locating foreign aid commitments in response to political violence," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 333-355, December.
    5. Friedrich Schneider & Tilman Brück & Daniel Meierrieks, 2010. "The Economics of Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: A Survey (Part II)," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1050, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Mohsen Shariatinia & Hamed A. Kermani, 2023. "Iran, China and the Persian Gulf: An unfolding engagement," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S1), pages 36-45, February.
    7. Khan, Khalid & Khurshid, Adnan & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier, 2023. "Investigating the relationship between geopolitical risks and economic security: Empirical evidence from central and Eastern European countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    8. Bashar Dayoub & Peifeng Yang & Sarah Omran & Qiuyi Zhang & Xu Chen & Akram Ahmed Noman Alabsi & Alaa Dayoub, 2024. "The Belt and Road Initiative’s impact on tourism and heritage along the Silk Roads: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Ali Parchami, 2023. "The Dynamics of Sino‐Iranian Relations: Strategic Veneer, Intrinsic Tensions and Third‐party Leverage," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S1), pages 7-18, February.
    10. Qin, Yafeng & Guo, Jianke & Wu, Shasha, 2025. "The resilience evolution and dynamic process identification of the global shipping network," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Inam Ullah Khalil & Sehresh Hena & Usman Ghani & Raza Ullah & Inayatullah Jan & Abdul Rauf & Abdul Rehman & Azhar Abbas & Luan Jingdong, 2021. "Development and Sustainability of Rural Economy of Pakistan through Local Community Support for CPEC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Chenxi Tang & Xiaojun Du, 2024. "Geopolitical Risk and Ownership Decision in Green Overseas Investment: Dual Moderation of Corporate Green Technology Capability and Host Green Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:61:y:2025:i:1:p:46-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.