IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/asseca/v7y2020i3p305-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why North Korea Could Not Implement the Chinese Style Reform and Opening? The Internal Contradiction Between Economic Reform and Political Stability

Author

Listed:
  • Sungmin Cho

Abstract

Can North Korea implement Chinese-style reform and opening-up policies? This is an important question, directly relevant to the policy debate on North Korea’s nuclear challenges. Through comparative historical analysis, I argue that Pyongyang has failed to adopt the Chinese-style reform and opening-up for the internal and structural restraints. The Chinese experience shows that the economic reform and opening, to be successful, requires a certain degree of political reform and openness to be executed together. North Korea could not implement the economic reform and opening policies as effectively as China did, not because of the external conditions like international sanctions or security threat to the country, but more for the internal contradiction that North Korea’s own economic development is likely to endanger the stability of the political system more rapidly and widely than China has experienced. For this analysis, I rely on North Korea’s published laws and economic policies, previous survey works and scholarly works published in Korean and Chinese.

Suggested Citation

  • Sungmin Cho, 2020. "Why North Korea Could Not Implement the Chinese Style Reform and Opening? The Internal Contradiction Between Economic Reform and Political Stability," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 7(3), pages 305-324, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:7:y:2020:i:3:p:305-324
    DOI: 10.1177/2347797020962625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2347797020962625
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2347797020962625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim,Byung-Yeon, 2017. "Unveiling the North Korean Economy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107183797.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soohyon Kim & Wook Sohn & Changyong Choi, 2020. "The North Korean Economy: Sustainable or Muddling-Through?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Syngjoo Choi & Byung-Yeon Kim & Jungmin Lee & Sokbae (Simon) Lee, 2020. "Institutions, competitiveness and cognitive ability," CeMMAP working papers CWP31/20, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. Duol Kim, 2021. "The great divergence on the Korean peninsula (1910–2020)," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 318-341, November.
    4. Choi, Syngjoo & Kim, Byung-Yeon & Lee, Jungmin & Lee, Sokbae, 2020. "A tale of two Koreas: Property rights and fairness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 112-130.
    5. Kim, Byung-Yeon & Lee, Suk, 2021. "North Korea's GDP: Features and issues," Dialogue on the North Korea Economy May 2021, Korea Development Institute (KDI).
    6. Jai S. Mah, 2021. "The Sino‐North Korea international economic relationship and the economic development of North Korea," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 586-600, February.
    7. Kim, Kyoochul, 2022. "The North Korean economy seen by satellite: Estimates of national performance, regional gaps based on nighttime light," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Syngjoo Choi & Byung-Yeon Kim & Jungmin Lee & Sokbae Lee, 2021. "Why North Korean Refugees are Reluctant to Compete: The Roles of Cognitive Ability," Papers 2108.08097, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:7:y:2020:i:3:p:305-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.