IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/agspub/v11y2022i1p134-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land and Contestations over Autochthony and Local Citizenship in Agrarian Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Gertrude Dzifa Torvikey

Abstract

This article examines the reimagination of communities in an industrial cassava frontier of Ghana in the wake of a contested land grab supported by state and community institutions. Qualitative and survey data were used to construct the existing social relations in the communities through the lens of earlier processes of agrarian change that have transformed the social base of the communities. It is argued that the expansion of capitalist production systems into agrarian areas results in local citizenship contestations centered on land, and redefinition and reclassification of people and their access to land. The multiple claims and contestations that arose from the land grab and the political reactions from below are highlighted. It is further argued that differentiated dispossession and class differences determine the strategies used by affected people. While some farmers demonstrated agency by holding on to a “little pie†to enjoy greater community social cohesion, others, drawing from their local citizenship status, although contested, fought the land grab.

Suggested Citation

  • Gertrude Dzifa Torvikey, 2022. "Land and Contestations over Autochthony and Local Citizenship in Agrarian Ghana," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 11(1), pages 134-157, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:agspub:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:134-157
    DOI: 10.1177/22779760211068791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22779760211068791
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22779760211068791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gertrude Dzifa Torvikey, 2021. "Land, Gender, and Class Relations in Ghana’s Cassava Frontier," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 10(1), pages 139-154, April.
    2. Akaateba, Millicent Awialie, 2019. "The politics of customary land rights transformation in peri-urban Ghana: Powers of exclusion in the era of land commodification," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Hill,Polly, 1986. "Development Economics on Trial," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521310963.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Lodewijks, 1994. "Anthropologists and economists: conflict or cooperation?," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 81-104.
    2. Sumbo, Dennis Kamaanaa, 2022. "Indigenes’ exclusion from neo-customary land: A perspective from changes in usufruct rights in Pramso, peri-urban Kumasi – Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Beaman, Lori & Dillon, Andrew, 2012. "Do household definitions matter in survey design? Results from a randomized survey experiment in Mali," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 124-135.
    4. M.Ellman., 2010. "What Did The Study of The Soviet Economy Contribute to Mainstream Economics?," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 3.
    5. Ehwi, Richmond Juvenile & Mawuli, Divine Asafo, 2021. "‘Landguardism’ in Ghana: Examining public perceptions about the driving factors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Festus A. Asaaga, 2021. "Building on “Traditional” Land Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Rural Ghana: Adaptive or Anachronistic?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    7. David Hulme & John Toye, 2006. "The case for cross-disciplinary social science research on poverty, inequality and well-being," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 1085-1107.
    8. Jacob Etten, 2022. "Revisiting the adequacy of the economic policy narrative underpinning the Green Revolution," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1357-1372, December.
    9. Peter Robb, 1992. "Peasants’choices? Indian agriculture and the limits of commercialization in nineteenth-century Bihar," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 45(1), pages 97-119, February.
    10. Ruta Aidis, 2003. "Officially Despised Yet Tolerated: Open-air Markets and Entrepreneurship in Post-socialist Countries," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 461-473.
    11. Kandel, Matt & Anghileri, Daniela & Alare, Rahinatu S. & Lovett, Peter N. & Agaba, Genevieve & Addoah, Thomas & Schreckenberg, Kate, 2022. "Farmers’ perspectives and context are key for the success and sustainability of farmer-managed natural regeneration (FMNR) in northeastern Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Akwabi-Ameyaw, Kofi, 1997. "Producer cooperative resettlement projects in Zimbabwe: Lessons from a failed agricultural development strategy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 437-456, March.
    13. Hann, Chris, 2008. "Comment on economic anthropology: Chris Hann reflects on the anthropology theme of the newsletter's last issue," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 9(2), pages 3-4.
    14. Alastair Orr & Elijah Muange, 2022. "Hedgehog or fox? Theories of change for dryland cereals in Eastern Africa," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 532-549, April.
    15. John Toye & David Hulme & University of Manchester, 2005. "The case for cross-disciplinary social science research on poverty, inequality and well-being," Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-001, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    16. Américo Mendes, 2005. "Intergenerational transfers in rural households: A game theoretical approach," Labor and Demography 0503004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Agboola, Alirat Olayinka & Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed & Olapade, Daramola Thompson & Odebode, Adedayo Ayodeji, 2023. "Transnational large-scale land investments in developing economies: What role do formal institutions play?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Amanuel Weldegebriel & Engdawork Assefa & Meron Tekalign & Anton Van Rompaey, 2022. "Urban Land Monetization-Driven Land Use Orientations: An Insight from Land Lease Prices in Addis Ababa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, May.
    19. David J. Lewis & Rick Gregory & Geoffrey D. Wood, 1993. "Indigenising Extension: Farmers, Fish‐Seed Traders and Poverty‐Focused Aquaculture in Bangladesh," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 185-194, June.
    20. Howard White, 2005. "Combining the Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Poverty Measurement and Analysis," Development and Comp Systems 0505003, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:agspub:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:134-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.