IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v13y2018i2p5-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi €“ Level Governance Towards Regional Development In Postcommunist Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Zuzana DVOØAKOVA LiSKOVA

    (University of South Bohemia Èeské Budìjovice, BraniSovskA 1645/31a 370 05 Èeské Budìjovice. Czech Republic)

  • Petra PARTLOVA

    (The Institute of Technology and Business in Èeské Budìjovice, Okružni 517/10, Èeské Budìjovice 370 01, Czech Republic)

  • Alfréd KROGMANN

    (Faculty of Natural Sciences, Tr. A. Hlinku 1, 949 74 Nitra, Slovak Republic)

Abstract

The study represents an attempt to analyze process of multi-level governance (MLG) in two post-communist countries: Czech Republic and Slovakia. MLG process has been something unknown in Central Europe countries to the end of the year 1989, influenced by communists´ ideology of centralization every aspect of social and political life. Interview participants in figure of 30 stakeholders were engaged in workshops as parts of the process and they discussed initial scenario versions and criteria choice which were offered to them for analyzing. There were developed 5 alternative scenarios of tourism development. Scenarios of systematic tourism development based on the rules of sustainable community development and common decision making within the regions took the most positive community evaluation. Empirical implementation of MLG, discussions and agreements of those interested in regional development in order shows potential and took great interest and acceptation among community participants in the both regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zuzana DVOØAKOVA LiSKOVA & Petra PARTLOVA & Alfréd KROGMANN, 2018. "Multi €“ Level Governance Towards Regional Development In Postcommunist Countries," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(2), pages 5-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:5-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://um.ase.ro/no132/1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham Scott & Ian Ball & Tony Dale, 1997. "New Zealand's public sector management reform: Implications for the United States," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 357-381.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susan Newberry & June Pallot, 2006. "New Zealand's Financial Management System: Implications for Democracy," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 221-227, September.
    2. Susan Newberry, 2003. "`Sector Neutrality‘ and NPM‘Incentives’: Their Use in Eroding the Public Sector," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(30), pages 28-34, July.
    3. Manuel Crespo, 2001. "Tendances actuelles des politiques publiques à l'égard de l'enseignement supérieur: une analyse comparative," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 27(3), pages 279-295, September.
    4. Wallis, Joe & Dollery, Brian, 2001. "Government Failure, Social Capital and the Appropriateness of the New Zealand Model for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 245-263, February.
    5. Tracy Yandle, 2006. "Sharing natural resource management responsibility: Examining the New Zealand rock lobster co-management experience," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 39(3), pages 249-278, September.
    6. Jens Steffek, 2008. "Public Accountability and the Public Sphere of International Governance," RECON Online Working Papers Series 3, RECON.
    7. Bidhya Bowornwathana & Ora-orn Poocharoen, 2005. "Managing Reforms: The Politics of Organizing Reform Work," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 233-247, September.
    8. Allan D. Barton, 2002. "Public-Sector Accounting:A Common Reporting Framework? A Rejoinder," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 12(28), pages 41-49, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:5-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.