IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v13y2018i2p21-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Successfulness Of Malaysian Green Open Spaces: An Assessment Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Nurhayati Abdul MALEK

    (Centre of Studies in Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Amanina NASHAR

    (International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Gombak 53100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

Abstract

Numerous researchers had evidence on the significant roles of parks and green open spaces in addressing the cultural, social, environmental needs of its users, as well as its contribution to the living quality. Indeed, it is noticeable that parks functions had a strong connection with the theory of human needs particularly in offering the aesthetics pleasures, recreational opportunities, being close and contact with nature. Nevertheless, a successful parks criterion is not merely intended to provide sufficient amount of green spaces per se, but rather to focus on the park quality to serve its people. The Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) method is one the effective means applied in this paper, to develop the assessment tools for Malaysian neighbourhood parks. The SEM findings indicates it is a good fitting model with (?2/df =2.158; RMSEA = .071, CFI = .893; AGFI= .873; GFI = .899, p = .000) and variance extracted (VE) was 37%. Hence, it is hoped that the quality neighbourhood park (QNP) assessment tools produced based on the model result will assist planners and landscape architects to produce high quality of Malaysia Neighbourhood Parks in future.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurhayati Abdul MALEK & Amanina NASHAR, 2018. "Measuring Successfulness Of Malaysian Green Open Spaces: An Assessment Tool," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(2), pages 21-37, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:21-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://um.ase.ro/no132/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francis, Jacinta & Wood, Lisa J. & Knuiman, Matthew & Giles-Corti, Billie, 2012. "Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1570-1577.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Wenhao & Stickley, Andrew & Ueda, Michiko, 2021. "Green space and suicide mortality in Japan: An ecological study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    2. Shixian Luo & Jing Xie & Katsunori Furuya, 2021. "“We Need such a Space”: Residents’ Motives for Visiting Urban Green Spaces during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Annemarie Ruijsbroek & Sigrid M. Mohnen & Mariël Droomers & Hanneke Kruize & Christopher Gidlow & Regina Gražulevičiene & Sandra Andrusaityte & Jolanda Maas & Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen & Margarita Trigue, 2017. "Neighbourhood green space, social environment and mental health: an examination in four European cities," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(6), pages 657-667, July.
    4. Sung-Kwon Hong & Sang-Woo Lee & Hyun-Kil Jo & Miyeon Yoo, 2019. "Impact of Frequency of Visits and Time Spent in Urban Green Space on Subjective Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Paula Hooper & Julian Bolleter & Nicole Edwards, 2022. "Development of a planning support system to evaluate transit-oriented development masterplan concepts for optimal health outcomes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(9), pages 2429-2450, November.
    6. Fleckney, Paul & Bentley, Rebecca, 2021. "The urban public realm and adolescent mental health and wellbeing: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    7. Doll, Claire A. & Burton, Michael P. & Pannell, David J. & Rollins, Curtis L., 2022. "How green is green enough? Landscape preferences and water use in urban parks," Working Papers 320820, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    8. Doll, Claire A. & Burton, Michael P. & Pannell, David J. & Rollins, Curtis L., 2023. "Are greenspaces too green? Landscape preferences and water use in urban parks," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    9. Paloma Morales-Flores & Carlos Marmolejo-Duarte, 2021. "Can We Build Walkable Environments to Support Social Capital? Towards a Spatial Understanding of Social Capital; a Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Amy Hillier & Bing Han & Theodore S. Eisenman & Kelly R. Evenson & Thomas L. McKenzie & Deborah A. Cohen, 2016. "Using Systematic Observations to Understand Conditions that Promote Interracial Experiences in Neighbourhood Parks," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 51-64.
    11. Li, Dongying & Newman, Galen & Zhang, Tiantian & Zhu, Rui & Horney, Jennifer, 2021. "Coping with post-hurricane mental distress: The role of neighborhood green space," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    12. Jackie Parker & Greg D. Simpson, 2018. "Public Green Infrastructure Contributes to City Livability: A Systematic Quantitative Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Wei Gao & Yukari Nagai, 2021. "The Influence of Street Microenvironment on the Walking Activities of Older Adults: A Longitudinal Study Based on the Structural Equation Model and Manipulated Photos," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Astell-Burt, Thomas & Navakatikyan, Michael & Eckermann, Simon & Hackett, Maree & Feng, Xiaoqi, 2022. "Is urban green space associated with lower mental healthcare expenditure?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    15. Lai, Lawrence W.C. & Ho, Daniel C.W. & Chau, K.W. & Yu, Esther Y.T. & Lam, Cindy L.K. & Leung, Nixon T.H. & Davies, Stephen N.G., 2021. "Property rights & the perceived health contribution of public open space in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Ietza Bojorquez & Lina Ojeda-Revah, 2018. "Urban public parks and mental health in adult women: Mediating and moderating factors," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(7), pages 637-646, November.
    17. Piaggio, Matías, 2021. "The value of public urban green spaces: Measuring the effects of proximity to and size of urban green spaces on housing market values in San José, Costa Rica," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Lowe, Melanie & Arundel, Jonathan & Hooper, Paula & Rozek, Julianna & Higgs, Carl & Roberts, Rebecca & Giles-Corti, Billie, 2020. "Liveability aspirations and realities: Implementation of urban policies designed to create healthy cities in Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    19. Lachowycz, Kate & Jones, Andy P., 2014. "Does walking explain associations between access to greenspace and lower mortality?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 9-17.
    20. Agnieszka Szczepańska & Katarzyna Pietrzyk, 2020. "An Evaluation of Public Spaces with the Use of Direct and Remote Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:21-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.