IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rampas/v2019y2019i33p147-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis Of Developmental Progression: The Case Of Poland And South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Natanya MEYER

    (WorkWell Research Unit, School of Management Sciences, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University, South Africa)

  • Daniel Francois MEYER

    (TRADE Research Unit, School of Economic Sciences, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University, South Africa)

Abstract

The growth and development of the economy of any country is dependent on many factors, but theory indicates that good governance with quality institutions, which provides leadership and coordination, are important in this process. Over the last decade, South Africa as a developing country, has experienced low levels of growth and development. The country has also lost ground in terms of its global standing and competitiveness. Contrary to this, Poland has experienced impressive growth and development levels over the last two decades. This study, therefore, has the objective to analyse and compare the two countries, taking into account a number of global indicators. The methodology included a quantitative and comparative approach in the achievement of the main objective. Both countries were analysed over 17 years (2000 to 2017) based on global indicators within the groupings of economics; social, health and education; business and innovation; and politics and governance. Results indicate that for all the categories, Poland outperformed South Africa for the said period. This could be especially due to South Africa’s poor management and governance, policy uncertainty, structural economic problems, growing corruption, and crime. South Africa can learn from countries such as Poland to ensure clear policy formulation and effective implementation by means of quality institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Natanya MEYER & Daniel Francois MEYER, 2019. "A Comparative Analysis Of Developmental Progression: The Case Of Poland And South Africa," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 147-164, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2019:y:2019:i:33:p:147-164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ramp.ase.ro/_data/files/articole/2019/33-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natanya Meyer & Christelle Auriacombe, 2019. "Good Urban Governance and City Resilience: An Afrocentric Approach to Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Ray Hudson, 2002. "New geographies and forms of work and unemployment and public policy innovation in Europe," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 93(3), pages 316-335, August.
    3. Armenia Androniceanu, 2019. "Social Responsibility, an Essential Strategic Option for a Sustainable Development in the Field of Bio-Economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(52), pages 503-503, August.
    4. repec:srs:journl:jarle:v:8:y:2017:i:4(26):p:1377-1385 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Rabeea Sadaf & Judit Oláh & József Popp & Domicián Máté, 2018. "An Investigation of the Influence of the Worldwide Governance and Competitiveness on Accounting Fraud Cases: A Cross-Country Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, February.
    6. Klimach, Anna & Dawidowicz, Agnieszka & Źróbek, Ryszard, 2018. "The Polish land administration system supporting good governance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 547-555.
    7. Daniel MEYER & T MASEHLA & Sebastian KOT, 2017. "The Relationship between Economic Growth and Economic Development A Regional Assessment in South Africa," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(4(26)), pages 1377-1385.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Judit Oláh & Eszter Krisán & Anna Kiss & Zoltán Lakner & József Popp, 2020. "PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews of the Bioethanol Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-35, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ane-Mari Androniceanu & Raluca Dana Căplescu & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Cosmin Dobrin, 2021. "The Interdependencies between Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and Pollution in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Natanya Meyer & Christelle Auriacombe, 2019. "Good Urban Governance and City Resilience: An Afrocentric Approach to Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Felipe Arenas-Torres & Miguel Bustamante-Ubilla & Roberto Campos-Troncoso, 2021. "The Incidence of Social Responsibility in the Adoption of Business Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Pavol KRAL & Katarina JANOSKOVA & Tomas KLIESTIK, 2018. "Key Determinants Of The Public Transport User’S Satisfaction," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(31), pages 36-51, December.
    5. Shi Shen & Ke Shi & Junwang Huang & Changxiu Cheng & Min Zhao, 2023. "Global online social response to a natural disaster and its influencing factors: a case study of Typhoon Haiyan," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Brândușa Mariana Bejan & Claudiu Pușcaș, 2020. "A Qualitative Approach to the Sustainable Orientation of Generation Z in Retail: The Case of Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Monica Ramos Montesdeoca & Agustín J. Sánchez Medina & Felix Blázquez Santana, 2019. "Research Topics in Accounting Fraud in the 21st Century: A State of the Art," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, March.
    8. Batara Surya & Hamsina Hamsina & Ridwan Ridwan & Baharuddin Baharuddin & Firman Menne & Andi Tenri Fitriyah & Emil Salim Rasyidi, 2020. "The Complexity of Space Utilization and Environmental Pollution Control in the Main Corridor of Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-41, November.
    9. Zhiqiang Zhou & Wenyan Liu & Pengfei Cheng & Zhenjin Li, 2022. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on Enterprise Sustainable Development and Its Spatial-Temporal Evolution: An Empirical Analysis Based on Urban Panel Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Mónica Duque-Acevedo & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & Natalia Yakovleva & Francisco Camacho-Ferre, 2020. "Analysis of the Circular Economic Production Models and Their Approach in Agriculture and Agricultural Waste Biomass Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-32, December.
    11. Li, Bingqin & Peng, Huamin, 2006. "The social protection of rural workers in the construction industry in urban China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6226, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Podhorska Ivana & Valaskova Katarina & Stehel Vojtech & Kliestik Tomas, 2019. "Possibility of Company Goodwill Valuation: Verification in Slovak and Czech Republic," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(3), pages 338-356, September.
    13. Luma Al-Qudah & Barbara Piontek & Judit Olah, 2021. "Economic Growth and Foreign Direct Investment in the Context of Financial Development: Evidence from Jordan," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 762-782.
    14. Vedia Akansu & Aykut Karaman, 2023. "The Assessment of Greyfields in Relation to Urban Resilience within the Context of Transect Theory: Exemplar of Kyrenia–Arapkoy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Cătălina Silvia Crișan-Mitra & Liana Stanca & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2020. "Corporate Social Performance: An Assessment Model on an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    16. Piotr Kulyk & Mariola Michalowska & Lukasz Augustowski, 2020. "Sustainable Consumption in the Market of Food Production: The Case of Lubuskie Voivodeship," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 225-240.
    17. Mohamed Abouelhassan Ali & Moaaz Kabil & Rahaf Alayan & Róbert Magda & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2021. "Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Performance in Egypt: An Empirical Study Based on the Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Batara Surya & Haeruddin Saleh & Seri Suriani & Harry Hardian Sakti & Hadijah Hadijah & Muhammad Idris, 2020. "Environmental Pollution Control and Sustainability Management of Slum Settlements in Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-34, August.
    19. Joanna Krzywda & Dariusz Krzywda & Armenia Androniceanu, 2021. "Managing the Energy Transition through Discourse. The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    20. Anna VORONTSOVA & Tetiana VASYLIEVA. & Yuriy BILAN & Grzegorz OSTASZ & Tetyana MAYBORODA, 2020. "The Influence Of State Regulation Of Education For Achieving The Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study Of Central And Eastern European Countries," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 6-26, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Competitiveness; governance; growth and development; Poland; South Africa;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • J18 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2019:y:2019:i:33:p:147-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Androniceanu Armenia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.