IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v19y2025i1p538-548.html

Systematic Review Of Theoretical Frameworks In Green Consumer Purchasing Behavior Research

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Å»EMIGAÅ A
  • Agnieszka WIÅšNIEWSKA
  • Katarzyna LICZMAŃSKA-KOPCEWICZ
  • Zoritza KIRESIEWA
  • Hannamaija TUOVILA

Abstract

This study systematically investigates how green consumer purchasing behavior (GCPB) is conceptualized and studied through theoretical frameworks, across non-food (nF) market contexts and via research methods that enable their application. Employing the Theory-Context Methodology (TCM) framework, the review identifies dominant and emerging theories, their empirical functions, market-level applications, and methodological configurations. The analysis is based on a refined dataset of 199 empirical studies (1990–2023) indexed in Scopus and aligned with the GCPB-nF domain. Findings indicate that the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Willingness to Pay (WTP) are the most frequently employed frameworks. Theoretical models are applied either (1) as structural foundations for hypothesis testing, (2) as sources of constructs guiding variable selection, or (3) as conceptual scaffolding for broader model development. TPB and WTP are particularly versatile and often appear in hybrid configurations, whereas many other frameworks are only marginally represented. Application intensity varies substantially across product contexts, with green products, clothing, and electronics being the most researched. Methodologically, survey-based quantitative designs dominate, particularly in studies grounded in TPB and Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), while experimental designs are primarily used with WTP. Qualitative and mixed-methods approaches are notably underrepresented. These patterns reveal significant research gaps, especially in theory-method and theory-context integration. This study contributes to the cumulative development of the GCPB-nF field and offers a foundation for the notably underexplored area of bio-based product purchasing, by mapping theoretical applications and highlighting underutilized theory-context-method configurations.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Å»EMIGAÅ A & Agnieszka WIÅšNIEWSKA & Katarzyna LICZMAŃSKA-KOPCEWICZ & Zoritza KIRESIEWA & Hannamaija TUOVILA, 2025. "Systematic Review Of Theoretical Frameworks In Green Consumer Purchasing Behavior Research," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(1), pages 538-548, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:538-548
    DOI: 10.24818/IMC/2025/05.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2025/pdf_IMC2025/5_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24818/IMC/2025/05.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orset, Caroline, 2021. "Is information a good policy instrument to influence the energy behaviour of households?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheng, Xushan & Zhang, Xiaoling & Huang, Yali & Zhou, Xinyue, 2026. "Going green for Eco or Ego? A meta-analysis of the comparative effects of environmental appeals and personal appeals on pro-environmental outcomes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Shen, Yu & Wang, Xinping, 2025. "Understanding public participation in community shared energy storage: Formative mechanism of willingness and subsequent behavior diffusion process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    3. Zhang, Chaoqun & Zha, Donglan & Jiang, Pansong & Wang, Fu & Yang, Guanglei & Salman, Muhammad & Wu, Qing, 2023. "The effect of customized information feedback on individual electricity saving behavior: Evidence from a field experiment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Kesselring, Anne, 2025. "Energy labels in the European Union: Consumer inattention and producer responses," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:538-548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.