IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v14y2020i1p677-687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data Analysis, Fundamental Factor In The Elaboration Of The Top Organizational Managerial Decision

Author

Listed:
  • Marian Sorin IONESCU
  • Olivia NEGOITA

Abstract

The processes for the elaboration of the top modern organizational managerial decision are characterized by a high degree of complexity and uncertainty. The high financial sustainability and their implicit strategic consequences determined on long-terms are only two relevant parameters identified in this scientific communication. Also the following components are monitored as theoretical, transposable entities, subsequently operational criteria of choosing decisional alternatives: the use of the probability calculus in the decision elaboration processes, influence of the primary decisions on future evolutions, as the decision quantifies the information value, as the attitude towards the risk arising from the business ecosystem affects data analysis. In this paper we comment about the features and the importance of these components in the general framework of Data Analysis.1 We consider and discuss some relevant examples of top decision such as: sending offers of the economic organizations’ contracts, launching policies for new products on the marked – affected by a high uncertainty degree, extension of the production capacities in the financial – banking sector, decision to grant credits at the organizational or individual level, economic organizations providing utilities, strategies appropriate for the environment and economic consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Marian Sorin IONESCU & Olivia NEGOITA, 2020. "Data Analysis, Fundamental Factor In The Elaboration Of The Top Organizational Managerial Decision," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 677-687, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:677-687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conferinta.management.ase.ro/archives/2020/PDF/3_20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Scott Armstrong, 1986. "The Ombudsman: Research on Forecasting: A Quarter-Century Review, 1960--1984," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 89-109, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Litsiou, Konstantia & Polychronakis, Yiannis & Karami, Azhdar & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos, 2022. "Relative performance of judgmental methods for forecasting the success of megaprojects," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1185-1196.
    2. Arvan, Meysam & Fahimnia, Behnam & Reisi, Mohsen & Siemsen, Enno, 2019. "Integrating human judgement into quantitative forecasting methods: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 237-252.
    3. Zvi Schwartz & Timothy Webb & Jean-Pierre I van der Rest & Larissa Koupriouchina, 2021. "Enhancing the accuracy of revenue management system forecasts: The impact of machine and human learning on the effectiveness of hotel occupancy forecast combinations across multiple forecasting horizo," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(2), pages 273-291, March.
    4. Marc Gruber & Claudia Venter, 2006. "„Die Kunst, die Zukunft zu erfinden“ — Theoretische Erkenntnisse und empirische Befunde zum Einsatz des Corporate Foresight in deutschen Großunternehmen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(7), pages 958-984, November.
    5. Abolghasemi, Mahdi & Hurley, Jason & Eshragh, Ali & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2020. "Demand forecasting in the presence of systematic events: Cases in capturing sales promotions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    6. Perera, H. Niles & Hurley, Jason & Fahimnia, Behnam & Reisi, Mohsen, 2019. "The human factor in supply chain forecasting: A systematic review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 574-600.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:677-687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.