IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v12y2018i1p957-967.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Management In The Romanian Upper Secondary Education: A Different Internal And External Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana CALINESCU
  • Georgiana COSTACHE
  • Corina FRASINEANU

Abstract

The concept of quality management (QM) has increasingly become a critical one over time no matter the industry or the profession in which it is referred to. Under the current challenges that have a great impact on the economy and the society, new requirements and conditions for how the providers of products, services and solutions in general perform in terms of quality have emerged. Taking into account these realities, we may observe that QM in education follows the same path as in all other fields of activity, developing on fundamental principles that are at a certain extent common to all other areas of the economy and of the society in general. In Romania the QM approach in education is governed both by national legislation formulated in compliance with the objectives presented in the strategy of the European Union (EU). Since its accession to the EU Romania entered a process of continuous improvement and transformation to comply with the recommendations made in the field of education. But why is important to discuss the QM in upper secondary education, what is the most appropriate QM approach and how is quality managed and implemented at the level of the institutions in the upper secondary education in Romania now and what is to be done in the future are some of the questions we tried to provide significant reasoning to. The present article has emerged as a collaboration of two university instructors in Business Process Quality Management and Business Management and one teacher in Business Administration in a high school of Economics in Bucharest incited by the finding that, according to the analysis performed by the university’s admission commission, the majority of the candidates in the admission process are graduates from high schools with specializations in Economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana CALINESCU & Georgiana COSTACHE & Corina FRASINEANU, 2018. "Quality Management In The Romanian Upper Secondary Education: A Different Internal And External Perspective," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 957-967, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:957-967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2018/pdf/5_22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georgiana Camelia CREȚAN, 2015. "Higher education and the labour market: evidence from Romania and European Union member states," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(Special(I), pages 63-74.
    2. Catalina RADU & Emilia GOGU, 2017. "Issues And Insights Regarding Tertiary Education. A Romanian Perspective," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 446-456, November.
    3. Jiju Antony & Netasha Krishan & Donna Cullen & Maneesh Kumar, 2012. "Lean Six Sigma for higher education institutions (HEIs)," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(8), pages 940-948, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Maciel-Monteon & Jorge Limon-Romero & Carlos Gastelum-Acosta & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Diego Tlapa & Manuel Iván Rodríguez Borbón, 2020. "Improvement project in higher education institutions: A BPEP-based model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Daniel Dasig Jr, 2017. "A frontier in organizational and business process innovation in service management through lean six sigma Kaizen project implementation," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 3(6), pages 263-283.
    3. Amrik Sohal & Tharaka Vass & Tristan Vasquez & Greg J. Bamber & Timothy Bartram & Pauline Stanton, 2022. "Success factors for lean six sigma projects in healthcare," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 215-240, June.
    4. Falah Abu & Hamed Gholami & Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman & Norhayati Zakuan & Dalia Streimikiene & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, 2021. "An SEM Approach for the Barrier Analysis in Lean Implementation in Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Yilmaz, Aysegul & Dora, Manoj & Hezarkhani, Behzad & Kumar, Maneesh, 2022. "Lean and industry 4.0: Mapping determinants and barriers from a social, environmental, and operational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Jorge L. García-Alcaraz & Liliana Avelar-Sosa & Juan I. Latorre-Biel & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Giner Alor-Hernández, 2017. "Role of Human Knowledge and Communication on Operational Benefits Gained from Six Sigma," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Andreas Kakouris & Eleni Sfakianaki & Marios Tsioufis, 2022. "Lean thinking in lean times for education," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 657-697, September.
    8. Jiju Antony & Maneesh Kumar, 2012. "Lean and Six Sigma Methodologies in NHS Scotland: An Empirical Study and Directions for Future Research," Quality Innovation Prosperity, Technical University of Košice, Department of integrated management, vol. 16(2).
    9. Bandar Alzahrani & Haitham Bahaitham & Murad Andejany & Ahmad Elshennawy, 2021. "How Ready Is Higher Education for Quality 4.0 Transformation according to the LNS Research Framework?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, May.
    10. Lukrafka, Tatiany Oleques & Silva, Diego Souza & Echeveste, Marcia, 2020. "A geographic picture of Lean adoption in the public sector: Cases, approaches, and a refreshed agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 506-517.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:957-967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.