IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/arasju/v7y2026i1p19-33.html

From Concept To Assessment: Evaluating The Circular Economy In The Eu And Romania Using Eurostat Circularity Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Daniela PETRUSE(ZANCA)

    (Doctoral School of Administration and Public Policy, BabeÈ™-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Bogdana NEAMÈšU

    (Doctoral School of Administration and Public Policy, BabeÈ™-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

The circular economy has become a central pillar of the European Union’s sustainable development policies; however, the transition from an extensive conceptual framework to rigorous empirical assessment remains uneven across Member States. This study represents a preliminary and diagnostic analysis of Romania’s circular economy performance within the EU, using the Eurostat Circular Economy Monitoring Framework updated in 2023. Rather than providing a definitive ranking, the research examines the capacity and limitations of exhaustive indicator-based assessments in comparative contexts. The research combines a literature review with descriptive and comparative analysis of official statistical data across the five dimensions of the European framework. Findings reveal methodological challenges, including indicator heterogeneity, unequal analytical relevance, and sensitivity to structural differences between Romania and other EU member states. Romania consistently ranks among the lower-performing Member States (Eurostat, 2025), reflecting high resource consumption, low material productivity, limited recycling, and modest integration into secondary raw material markets. However, these results are intended as a diagnostic assessment rather than a definitive evaluation. The study contributes to the literature by providing a systematic assessment of Romania’s circular economy performance within a European comparative context and by highlighting the limitations of approaches based exclusively on exhaustive indicators. The research highlights the need for a selective set of indicators structured according to an input–process–output logic, forming a foundation for constructing composite indicators, cluster-based comparisons, and more coherent, policy-relevant monitoring of circular economy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Daniela PETRUSE(ZANCA) & Bogdana NEAMÈšU, 2026. "From Concept To Assessment: Evaluating The Circular Economy In The Eu And Romania Using Eurostat Circularity Indicators," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 19-33, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:arasju:v:7:y:2026:i:1:p:19-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://aras.ase.ro/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/2.-Petruse_Neamtu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirchherr, Julian & Reike, Denise & Hekkert, Marko, 2017. "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 221-232.
    2. Willi Haas & Fridolin Krausmann & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Markus Heinz, 2015. "How Circular is the Global Economy?: An Assessment of Material Flows, Waste Production, and Recycling in the European Union and the World in 2005," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(5), pages 765-777, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D. D’Amato, 2021. "Sustainability Narratives as Transformative Solution Pathways: Zooming in on the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 231-242, June.
    2. Concepción Garcés-Ayerbe & Pilar Rivera-Torres & Inés Suárez-Perales & Dante I. Leyva-de la Hiz, 2019. "Is It Possible to Change from a Linear to a Circular Economy? An Overview of Opportunities and Barriers for European Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Companies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Chembessi Chedrak & Gohoungodji Paulin & Juste Rajaonson, 2023. "“A fine wine, better with age”: Circular economy historical roots and influential publications: A bibliometric analysis using Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS)," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1593-1612, December.
    4. Andreea Loredana Bîrgovan & Elena Simina Lakatos & Andrea Szilagyi & Lucian Ionel Cioca & Roxana Lavinia Pacurariu & George Ciobanu & Elena Cristina Rada, 2022. "How Should We Measure? A Review of Circular Cities Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Georgios Lanaras-Mamounis & Anastasios Kipritsis & Thomas A. Tsalis & Konstantinos Ι. Vatalis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2022. "A Framework for Assessing the Contribution of Firms to Circular Economy: a Triple-Level Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 883-902, September.
    6. Dominik Noll & Christian Lauk & Willi Haas & Simron Jit Singh & Panos Petridis & Dominik Wiedenhofer, 2022. "The sociometabolic transition of a small Greek island: Assessing stock dynamics, resource flows, and material circularity from 1929 to 2019," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 577-591, April.
    7. Arru, Brunella & Furesi, Roberto & Pulina, Pietro & Sau, Paola & Madau, Fabio A., . "The Circular Economy in the Agri-food system: A Performance Measurement of European Countries," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 24(2).
    8. Patrick Grüning & Justina Banionienė & Lina Dagilienė & Michael Donadelli & Marcus Jüppner & Renatas Kizys & Kai Lessmann, 2021. "The Quadrilemma of a Small Open Circular Economy Through a Prism of the 9R Strategies," Bank of Lithuania Working Paper Series 96, Bank of Lithuania.
    9. Ewa Mazur-Wierzbicka, 2021. "Towards Circular Economy—A Comparative Analysis of the Countries of the European Union," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
    10. Hervé Corvellec & Alison F. Stowell & Nils Johansson, 2022. "Critiques of the circular economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 421-432, April.
    11. Bhavesh Kumar & Love Kumar & Avinash Kumar & Ramna Kumari & Uroosa Tagar & Claudio Sassanelli, 2024. "Green finance in circular economy: a literature review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 16419-16459, July.
    12. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2020. "European environment policy for the circular economy: Implications for business and industry stakeholders," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1804-1812, November.
    13. Piotr Kafel & Krzysztof Rudziński, 2024. "The Importance of the Circular Economy Concept among Organizations within the Food Sector and a Management Systems Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Born, Konstantin, 2025. "Adoption of circular economy practices in the mining sector: Evidence from Chile," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Ozili, Peterson K & Opene, Francis, 2022. "The role of banks in the circular economy," MPRA Paper 113466, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Dragan, George Bogdan & Arfi, Wissal Ben & Tiberius, Victor & Ammari, Aymen & Ferasso, Marcos, 2024. "Acceptance of circular entrepreneurship: Employees’ perceptions on organizations’ transition to the circular economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. Julian Kirchherr & Thomas Bauwens & Tomás B. Ramos, 2023. "Circular disruption: Concepts, enablers and ways ahead," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 1005-1009, March.
    18. Pablo Piñones & Ivan Derpich & Ricardo Venegas, 2023. "Circular Economy 4.0 Evaluation Model for Urban Road Infrastructure Projects, CIROAD," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-32, February.
    19. Edgar Battand Towa Kouokam & Vanessa Zeller & Wouter Achten, 2021. "Assessing the circularity of regions: Stakes of trade of waste for treatment," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/332186, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Kristoffersen, Eivind & Mikalef, Patrick & Blomsma, Fenna & Li, Jingyue, 2021. "Towards a business analytics capability for the circular economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:arasju:v:7:y:2026:i:1:p:19-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Profiroiu Alina (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.