IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/arasju/v6y2025i3p16-28.html

Reform, Responsiveness, And Resilience: A Unified Framework For Agile Public Administration

Author

Listed:
  • Lance BARBIER

    (Public Administration, Independent Author, Cape Town, South Africa)

Abstract

This paper is based on the premise that fragmented reform efforts in developing countries fail to deliver sustained public value unless they are unified through an integrated governance model. It presents an in-depth thematic literature review of secondary sources published between 2000 and 2025, examining how Knowledge Management (KM), governance reform, and VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, Ambiguity) preparedness have evolved and influenced Public Administration practice. The object of research is the development of the 3R Framework, which synthesises three pillars, Reform, Responsiveness, and Resilience, to address the persistent gap between policy intent and operational reality. The investigated problem is the limited success of administrative reforms in resource-constrained environments, where outdated bureaucratic systems, siloed knowledge practices, and low VUCA-readiness undermine service delivery and citizen trust. The most important finding of this literature study is that integrating KM, RBME, and OKRs into multi-tier planning architectures can transform Public Administration from compliance-led to impact-driven governance. The framework positions directorates/business units as central delivery units and introduces Quarterly Performance Reviews (QPRs) as instruments for strategic alignment, learning, and resilience-building. This paper will be useful to Public Administration practitioners and policymakers seeking scalable, citizen-centric reform strategies. The implications are twofold: theoretically, the study contributes a unified model that bridges KM and VUCA preparedness within governance literature; practically, it offers a roadmap for governments, particularly in South Africa, to embed continuous learning, ethical leadership, and adaptive planning into their operations. Further empirical research is encouraged to validate the framework and explore its application across diverse governance contexts. The study asks why reforms fail in resource-constrained contexts and hypothesises that integrating KM, RBME, OKRs, and VUCA tools into a unified framework can enable adaptive, impact-driven governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Lance BARBIER, 2025. "Reform, Responsiveness, And Resilience: A Unified Framework For Agile Public Administration," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(3), pages 16-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:arasju:v:6:y:2025:i:3:p:16-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://aras.ase.ro/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2.-Barbier.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Wolf, 2005. "Public Administration's Multiple Institutionalized Frameworks," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 183-200, September.
    2. Ashiru Olayemi Aliyu & Kuppusamy Singaravelloo & Norma Mansor, 2021. "A Review of Administrative Reforms in Developing Countries: Why the Limited Success?," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 178190-1781, December.
    3. Lance Barbier & Robertson Tengeh, 2022. "Factors influencing the implementation of knowledge management in the South African government," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(7), pages 47-61, October.
    4. Andreas Hagedorn Krogh & Peter Triantafillou, 2024. "Developing New Public Governance as a public management reform model," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(10), pages 3040-3056, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schlogl, Lukas & Zeiner, Robert, 2025. "Die Governance des Großen Ganzen: Reformimpulse für eine gesamtstaatliche Entwicklungspolitik Österreichs," Briefing Papers 37, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
    2. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:7674-7681 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Christian Göpfert & Christine Wamsler & Werner Lang, 2019. "A framework for the joint institutionalization of climate change mitigation and adaptation in city administrations," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Priyanto Priyanto & Amirul Mustofa & Ilyas Masudin & Nevrettia Christantyawati & Wiwiek Harwiki, 2026. "Linking Green Job Satisfaction to Circular Economy Implementation: The Mediating Role of Psychological Climate and Employee Empowerment," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Bojan Moric Milovanovic & Matea Cvjetkovic & Jasmina Masovic, 2025. "Public Sector Entrepreneurship: Present State and Research Avenues for the Future," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, February.
    6. Ingo Bode, 2013. "Processing Institutional Change in Public Service Provision," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 323-339, September.
    7. Wawrzyniec Rudolf, 2024. "Local Authority and Cultural Institution Management: Insights from Agency and Stewardship Theories in Public Management," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special A), pages 378-389.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:arasju:v:6:y:2025:i:3:p:16-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Profiroiu Alina (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.