IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/smmscn/s2017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic-Mathematical Model In The Expert System Of Quality Assessment Of Public Procurement Based On Fuzzy Logic
[Экономико-Математическая Модель В Экспертной Системе Оценки Качества Государственных Закупок На Основе Нечёткой Логики]

Author

Listed:
  • Belokrylova Olga (Белокрылова О.С.)

    (Southern Federal University)

  • Streltsova Elena (Стрельцова Е.Д.)

    (South-Russian state Polytechnic University (NPI) named after M. I. Platov)

Abstract

At present, there is a need to develop models and systems based on them for the effective use of budgetary funds. In solving this problem, the key role played by the organization and evaluation of the quality of public procurement. The article provides an overview of existing approaches, models and various organizational proposals to solve this problem. This article is devoted to the creation of an expert system for assessing the quality of public procurement. The structure of the expert system including the block of knowledge base and its intellectual editor allowing to update and add new knowledge is offered. The task of creating economic and mathematical tools for assessing the quality of goods and services purchased by budget organizations. The characteristics evaluated by experts in solving the problem and the limits of their changes are selected. A logical-linguistic model has been created, which allows processing the qualitative characteristics of public procurement. The mathematical apparatus of fuzzy logic was used in the construction of the model. Formally described in the form of fuzzy sets qualitatively expressed input and output characteristics used in assessing the quality of public procurement. Membership functions expressing the semantics of fuzzy sets are given. The proposed fuzzy expert system uses the knowledge of experts in the form of production rules, allowing to obtain fuzzy conclusions based on fuzzy assumptions. The expert system is designed on the basis of application of Mamdani fuzzy inference algorithm in Fuzzy Logic Toolbox package of MATLAB computing environment. On the basis of the constructed logical-linguistic model, experiments were carried out to demonstrate the dependence of changes in the integral indicator of the quality of public procurement on the variations of their input characteristics. The proposed expert system with a built-in logical and linguistic model allows to make scientifically and quantitatively sound decisions in assessing the quality of goods and services purchased by budget organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Belokrylova Olga (Белокрылова О.С.) & Streltsova Elena (Стрельцова Е.Д.), 2020. "Economic-Mathematical Model In The Expert System Of Quality Assessment Of Public Procurement Based On Fuzzy Logic [Экономико-Математическая Модель В Экспертной Системе Оценки Качества Государственн," State and Municipal Management Scholar Notes, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 55-63.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:smmscn:s2017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/smmscn/s2017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frédéric Boehm & Juanita Olaya, 2006. "Corruption In Public Contracting Auctions: The Role Of Transparency In Bidding Processes," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(4), pages 431-452, December.
    2. Kim Loader, 2007. "The Challenge of Competitive Procurement: Value for Money Versus Small Business Support," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 307-314, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim Loader, 2018. "Small- and medium-sized enterprises and public procurement: A review of the UK coalition government's policies and their impact," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 47-66, February.
    2. Matteo Migheli, 2017. "The winner’s curse in auctions with losses," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 16(1), pages 113-126, November.
    3. Peter Nemec, 2024. "Contesting the public works domain: examining the factors affecting presence and success of SMES in public procurement," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(5), pages 2135-2173, November.
    4. Kidalov Max V. & Snider Keith F., 2011. "US and European Public Procurement Policies for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SME): A Comparative Perspective," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 1-43, December.
    5. Hans Pitlik & Björn Frank & Mathias Firchow, 2010. "The demand for transparency: An empirical note," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 177-195, June.
    6. repec:ath:journl:tome:30:v:2:y:2013:i:30:p:244-251 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Estache, Antonio & Iimi, Atsushi, 2008. "Procurement efficiency for infrastructure development and financial needs reassessed," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4662, The World Bank.
    8. Kim Loader, 2013. "Is Public Procurement a Successful Small Business Support Policy? A Review of the Evidence," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(1), pages 39-55, February.
    9. Emmanuelle Auriol & Antonio Estache & Liam Wren-Lewis, 2018. "Can Supranational Infrastructure Regulation Compensate for National Institutional Weaknesses?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 69(6), pages 913-936.
    10. Marques, Rui Cunha & Berg, Sanford V, 2010. "Revisiting the strengths and limitations of regulatory contracts in infrastructure industries," MPRA Paper 32890, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Tammi, Timo & Saastamoinen, Jani & Reijonen, Helen, 2020. "Public procurement as a vehicle of innovation – What does the inverted-U relationship between competition and innovativeness tell us?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    12. Andrea S. Patrucco & Davide Luzzini & Stefano Ronchi & Michael Essig & Markus Amann & Andreas H. Glas, 2017. "Designing a public procurement strategy: lessons from local governments," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 269-276, June.
    13. David Pickernell & Christine Atkinson & Christopher Miller, 2015. "Guest Editorial," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(1), pages 4-8, February.
    14. Bhabesh Hazarika & Pratap Ranjan Jena, 2017. "Public Procurement in India: Assessment of Institutional Mechanism, Challenges, and Reforms," Working Papers id:12004, eSocialSciences.
    15. Muhammad Ahmed Butt & Paul Katuse & Juliana Namada, 2019. "Government’s role as moderator in relationship of porter’s diamond factor conditions and firm’s performance," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(6), pages 40-48, October.
    16. Sümeyra Atmaca, 2020. "Application Period in Reverse Auctions," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 20/993, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    17. Anna Balsevich & Svetlana Pivovarova & Elena Podkolzina, 2011. "Information Transparency in Public Procurement: How it Works in Russian Regions," HSE Working papers WP BRP 01/EC/2011, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    18. Maria Ostrovnaya & Elena Podkolzina, 2013. "What impact does antitrust intervention have on competition? The case of public drug procurement in Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 32/EC/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    19. Werner Hölzl & Michael Böheim & Michael Klien & Eva Pichler, 2017. "Das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen im Spannungsfeld zwischen Billigst- und Bestbieterprinzip," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 59256, March.
    20. Paulo R. C. Reis & Sandro Cabral, 2015. "Public procurement strategy: the impacts of a preference programme for small and micro businesses," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 103-110, March.
    21. Dong-Her Shih & Ting-Wei Wu & Ming-Hung Shih & Wei-Cheng Tsai & David C. Yen, 2021. "A Novel Auction Blockchain System with Price Recommendation and Trusted Execution Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:smmscn:s2017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.