IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v17y2025i4p174-188.html

The Evolution of Disclosure Practices: A Bibliometric Mapping of Voluntary and Mandatory Disclosures Across International Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Zharifah Che Adenan
  • Roshima Haji Said
  • Syahiza Arsad

Abstract

This study presents a bibliometric analysis of voluntary and mandatory disclosure practices to examine their evolution, thematic trends, and intellectual structures within the international accounting literature. Using data extracted from the Scopus database covering publications between 2010 and 2025, a total of 1,196 records were analyzed through bibliometric techniques, including citation analysis, keyword co-occurrence mapping, and network visualization. Tools such as Harzing’s Publish or Perish and VOSviewer were employed for data cleaning, standardization, and visualization. The findings reveal three distinct phases in the development of disclosure research: an initial formative stage (2010–2015) focused on financial reporting and information asymmetry, an expansion stage (2016–2020) driven by regulatory reforms such as the EU Directive on non-financial disclosure, and a consolidation stage (2021–2025) marked by rapid growth in sustainability, ESG, and integrated reporting studies. The analysis identifies the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia as the most active contributors, while emerging economies such as Malaysia, Indonesia, and China are increasingly represented. Keyword mapping highlights key themes, including corporate governance, sustainability, firm performance, and legitimacy, while also pointing to emerging areas such as digitalization, artificial intelligence, and technological innovation in disclosure practices. The study concludes that disclosure research has matured into a dynamic, interdisciplinary field shaped by regulatory, market, and societal forces. Limitations include reliance on a single database and the exclusion of qualitative dimensions. Future research is recommended to explore underrepresented regions, assess disclosure quality, and investigate technology-driven reporting practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Zharifah Che Adenan & Roshima Haji Said & Syahiza Arsad, 2025. "The Evolution of Disclosure Practices: A Bibliometric Mapping of Voluntary and Mandatory Disclosures Across International Contexts," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 17(4), pages 174-188.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:174-188
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v17i4(I).4769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/4769/3183
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/4769
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v17i4(I).4769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    2. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    3. Guthrie, James & Ricceri, Federica & Dumay, John, 2012. "Reflections and projections: A decade of Intellectual Capital Accounting Research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 68-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fairouz Mustafa & Suman Lodh & Monomita Nandy & Vikas Kumar, 2022. "Coupling of cryptocurrency trading with the sustainable environmental goals: Is it on the cards?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1152-1168, March.
    2. Gianluca ZANELLATO, 2022. "Ï»¿Sustainable Development Goals And Accounting Profession: A Quantitative Review Of The Existent Literature," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(24), pages 1-8.
    3. Azmat, Fara & Lim, Weng Marc & Moyeen, Abdul & Voola, Ranjit & Gupta, Girish, 2023. "Convergence of business, innovation, and sustainability at the tipping point of the sustainable development goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Umer Aziz & Tariq Ahmad Lone & Ishtiaq Hussain Qureshi, 2025. "Exploring the triad: intellectual capital, performance, and sustainability through bibliometric analysis," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(8), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Ioana Bianca (Campean) Patrinjan, 2022. "CSR and Environment: a Bibliometric Mapping," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 390-399, September.
    6. Pooja Mishra & Kishore Kumar, 2024. "Uncovering the sustainability reporting: bibliometric analysis and future research directions," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 520-542, December.
    7. Haozhe Song & Gunnar Rimmel, 2025. "Debtholders' reaction to sustainability reporting regulations: International evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 88-115, January.
    8. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    9. Oehler, Andreas & Neuss, Charlotte, 2025. "ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Akinpelu, O.A. & Olaleye, O. & Fagbola, O., . "The Soil Organic Matter Decomposers: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4).
    11. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    13. J. Gómez-Verjan & I. Gonzalez-Sanchez & E. Estrella-Parra & R. Reyes-Chilpa, 2015. "Trends in the chemical and pharmacological research on the tropical trees Calophyllum brasiliense and Calophyllum inophyllum, a global context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1019-1030, November.
    14. Luis Araya-Castillo & Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Hugo Moraga & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Loet Leydesdorff & Dieter Franz Kogler & Bowen Yan, 2017. "Mapping patent classifications: portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1573-1591, September.
    16. Tuba Bircan & Almila Alkim Akdag Salah, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Social Sciences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Kumari, Rajni & Kumar, Manish & Vivekanand, V. & Pareek, Nidhi, 2023. "Chitin biorefinery: A narrative and prophecy of crustacean shell waste sustainable transformation into bioactives and renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. Luis Puente-Díaz & Doina Solís & Siu-heng Wong-Toro, 2024. "Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis on High Hydrostatic Pressure as New Sustainable Technology for Food Processing: Key Concepts and Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Fatih Albayrak & Oğuz Poyrazoğlu, 2024. "A Systematic Literature Review on Lean, Industry 4.0, and Digital Factory," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13486-13508, September.
    20. Migliavacca, Milena & Goodell, John W. & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2023. "A bibliometric review of portfolio diversification literature," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:174-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.