IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/red/issued/20-123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Fall of the Labor Income Share: the Role of Technological Change and Hiring Frictions

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Carbonero

    (University of Torino)

  • Christian Offermans

    (Deutsche Bundesbank)

  • Enzo Weber

    (IAB Institute for Employment Research)

Abstract

Documenting an average drop of the labor share of eight percentage points for eight European countries and the US between 1980 and 2007, we analyze the role of technological progress and labor market frictions. According to our results, while capital-labor substitution in general was not crucial, Information Communication Technology (ICT) explains more than half of the decline in the labor share, given an estimated elasticity of substitution with the labor input of 1.18. Considering hiring costs slightly dampens the estimated substitution effect at aggregate level. Additionally, by modelling the substitution between ICT and labor with a set of key labor market variables, we find it to be linked to both the share of routine occupations (positively) and the share of high-skill workers (negatively) with a similar strength. (Copyright: Elsevier)

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Carbonero & Christian Offermans & Enzo Weber, 2023. "The Fall of the Labor Income Share: the Role of Technological Change and Hiring Frictions," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 49, pages 251-268, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:red:issued:20-123
    DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2022.09.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2022.09.001
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to ScienceDirect subscribers and institutional members. See https://www.sciencedirect.com/ for details. Elasticity of substitution; Search and Matching; job polarisation; Skillbiased technological change
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.red.2022.09.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:issued:20-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.