IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/qui/ecosoc/y2006i18p97-121.html

Mecanismos de reesfuerzo para la institucionalización de la demanda de energía renovable de baja potencia. Una introducción

Author

Listed:
  • Juan José Jardón Urrieta

    (Facultad de Economía “Vasco de Quiroga”,UMSNH)

  • Salvador Padilla Hernández

    (Facultad de Economía “Vasco de Quiroga”,UMSNH)

Abstract

El objetivo de ésta investigación es analizar los mecanismos de reesfuerzo adecuados para fomentar y consolidar el uso de la energía renovable, en particular la distribución de baja potencia (DBP), en aglomeraciones urbanas intermedias como parte de un programa de medio ambiente. El trabajo se centra, por una parte, en el papel que tendrá la distribución de energía de baja potencia en comparación con energías convencionales y la transmisión de alta tensión para hacer frente a la necesidad social de proteger y mejorar el medio ambiente. Por tal motivo, se propone un esquema de distribución que pudiera seguirse en los próximos años para impulsar el desarrollo de tecnologías de energía renovable en concentraciones urbanas medianas y pequeñas. Por otra parte, debido a que el trabajo se circunscribe necesariamente dentro de un contexto institucional evolucionista, se plantean los mecanismos de reesfuerzo para la institucionalidad del medio ambiente y la energía renovable. En este sentido, es necesario diseñar y crear instituciones para que las energías renovables puedan satisfacer las necesidades de energía que no tengan un impacto ambiental y estén más de acuerdo con una política de medio ambiente de largo plazo. Para la creación de instituciones es necesario mirar los hábitos y las rutinas implícitas en las relaciones que determinan las prioridades de la sociedad. En este sentido, no sólo se identifican los mecanismos de reesfuerzo para conformar el cierre de la DBP (lock in) sino la evaluación de un programa de la institucionalización del medio ambiente.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan José Jardón Urrieta & Salvador Padilla Hernández, 2006. "Mecanismos de reesfuerzo para la institucionalización de la demanda de energía renovable de baja potencia. Una introducción," Economia y Sociedad., Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo, Facultad de Economia, issue 18, pages 97-121, Julio-Dic.
  • Handle: RePEc:qui:ecosoc:y:2006:i:18:p:97-121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.economiaysociedad.umich.mx/ojs_ecosoc/index.php/ecosoc/article/view/173/169
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 1998. "The Approach of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 166-192, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baarda, James R., 2003. "Current Law & Economics Debates: Tools for Assessing Fundamental Cooperative Changes?," 2003 Annual Meeting, October 29 31802, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
    2. Gintis, Herbert, 2004. "Modeling cooperation among self-interested agents: a critique," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 695-714, December.
    3. Michel S. Zouboulakis & John Kamarianos, 2002. "Racionalidad y cooperación entre firmas. Examen del comportamiento habitual de las industrias griegas," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 4(7), pages 98-113, July-Dece.
    4. Zafirovski, Milan, 1999. "A socio-economic approach to market transactions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 309-334.
    5. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.
    6. M. N. Ahmed & R. W. Scapens, 2000. "Cost allocation in Britain: towards an institutional analysis," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 159-204.
    7. Rahel Schomaker, 2014. "Institutional quality and private sector participation: theory and empirical findings," European Journal of Government and Economics, Europa Grande, vol. 3(2), pages 104-118, December.
    8. repec:osf:agrixi:xutyz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2023. "Stakeholder theory: Toward a classical institutional economics perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88.
    10. Saeed Parto, 2003. "Economic Activity and Institutions," Others 0303001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Pablo del Río & Cristina Peñasco & Desiderio Romero‐Jordán, 2015. "Distinctive Features of Environmental Innovators: An Econometric Analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 361-385, September.
    12. Loaiza Quintero, Osmar Leandro, 2007. "Comentarios sobre el enfoque de la Economía Institucional [Comments on the approach of Institutional Economics]," MPRA Paper 14047, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Mengjie Tian & Mingyong Hong & Ji Wang, 2023. "Land resources, market-oriented reform and high-quality agricultural development," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4165-4197, December.
    14. Rout, S., 2008. "Institutional and policy reforms in water sector in India: review of issues, concepts and trends," Conference Papers h042926, International Water Management Institute.
    15. Galbács, Péter, 2018. "A közgazdaságtan felszabadítása. A neoklasszikus ortodoxia és az intézményi közgazdaságtan közötti ellentét néhány módszertani kérdése [Freedom for economics. Some methodological aspects of the neoclassical v. institutional controversy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 44-65.
    16. Verónica Robert & Gabriel Yoguel & Octavio Lerena, 2017. "The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 761-793, September.
    17. Ahmet Burak Çetin, 2019. "The Effect of Economic and Political Institutions on Economic Growth: The Case of Developed Countries and Emerging Market Economies," Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, BETA Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 1-31.
    18. Daniela Bolzani & Alessandra Scandura, 2024. "The role of collaboration networks for innovation in immigrant-owned new technology-based firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1203-1233, August.
    19. Emilia Obiñska-Wajda, 2016. "The new institutional economics - main theories," "e-Finanse", University of Information Technology and Management, Institute of Financial Research and Analysis, vol. 12(1), pages 78-85, June.
    20. Saleth, R. M. & Dinar, A., 2003. "Water institutions and sector performance: A subjective theory of institutional change," Conference Papers h033033, International Water Management Institute.
    21. Damien Broussolle, 2006. "The Peace Of Work Agreement: The Emergence And Enforcement Of A Swiss Labour Market Institution," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2006-04, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qui:ecosoc:y:2006:i:18:p:97-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Faculty of Economics, Deparment of Informatics Services (DSI-FEVaQ) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Faculty of Economics, Deparment of Informatics Services (DSI-FEVaQ) to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/femicmx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.