IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Politique de l'emploi et réduction de la durée du travail

Listed author(s):
  • Jean-Paul Fitoussi
  • Daniel Szpiro

[eng] That the reduction in the length of the working-week seems to be the preferred mean of combatting unemployment is symptomatic of an evolution which has lead European governments to an acceptance of a permanently lower level of economic activity, and to formulate policies most aptly described at an international level as « competition by deflation ». The logic of work sharing is the adaptation of the supply of labour to the existing amount of employement. It is therefore a redistribution of a given amount of unemployment. If it is to be a genuine social advance, the reduction in the working week should be accompanied by a change in the distribution of income between all social groups. But when seen as an employment policy, it clearly implies only a redistribution of the existing wage bill between the employed and unemployed. In this article, we investigate the conditions necessary for the success of such a policy and its probable effects on employment. The results of the simulations of econometric models which have been performed for a number of European countries — similar for the most part — are then analysed. But despite these efforts of quantification, a great uncertainty remains as to the effects of such a policy on both production processes and the behaviour of agents. Moreover a further theoretical and empirical analysis of these effects leads us to doubt that the reduction in the length of the working week provides any answer to the problem of unemployment. [fre] Que la réduction de la durée du travail apparaisse comme un moyen privilégié de lutte contre le chômage est symptomatique d'une évolution qui a conduit les gouvernements européens à s'accommoder de la récession actuelle, à inscrire leur politique dans ce qui est devenu au niveau international une « concurrence par la dépression ». La logique du partage du travail est en effet celle de l'adaptation de l'offre de travail à l'emploi, celle d'une autre répartition d'un volume donné de chômage. Si elle est conquête sociale, la réduction de la durée du travail devrait s'accompagner d'une modification de la répartition des revenus entre toutes les catégories sociales. Considérée comme une politique de l'emploi, elle implique une redistribution de la seule masse salariale entre personnes employées et chômeurs. Dans cet article, on s'interroge sur les conditions de réussite d'une telle politique, sur les effets probables qu'une réduction de la durée du travail aura sur l'emploi. Les résultats des simulations, convergents pour la plupart, qui ont été effectuées au moyen de modèles économétriques dans plusieurs pays européens, sont alors analysés. Mais au-delà des efforts de quantification, l'incertitude demeure quant aux effets d'une telle mesure sur les processus de production et les comportements des agents. Une analyse à la fois théorique et empirique de ces effets est présentée et elle conduit à douter de ce que la réduction de la durée du travail constitue réellement une réponse au problème de l'emploi.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Observations et diagnostics économiques : revue de l'OFCE.

Volume (Year): 4 (1983)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 99-116

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1983_num_4_1_947
Note: DOI:10.3406/ofce.1983.947
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1983_num_4_1_947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.