IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_1993_num_110_4_5636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'évolution du caractère égalitaire du prélèvement fiscalo-social sous la cinquième République : un complément

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Loquet
  • Jerry Rafaliarison
  • Alain Trannoy

Abstract

[eng] The Development of the Egalitarian Character of Tax and Social Security Contributions under the Fifth Republic: A Supplement, . by Rachel Loquet, Jerry Rafaliarison and Alain Trannoy.. . The purpose of this article is to expand the study on the comparison between the egalitarian nature of the income tax scale and social security contributions from 1959 to 1989, as undertaken by Trannoy et al (1991 Economie et Prévisions, Taxation Studies). In common with the previous study, this research restricts its focus to the study of the typical case of the single employee. This time, however, employers' social contributions are taken into account and social contributions paid under the "solidarité" scheme placing the long-term unemployed in short-term jobs are distinguished from other social contributions. The other enhancement consists of obtaining results using four samples of fiscally single individuals for 1984 and 1988. The recurrent observation fits in with the Lorenz-curve domination of the 1970s scales, sometimes by those of the 1980s and sometimes by those of the 1960s, depending on the case considered. [fre] L'évolution du caractère égalitaire du prélèvement fiscalo-sodal sous la cinquième République : un complément, . par Rachel Loquet, Jerry Rafaliarison, Alain Trannoy.. . L'objectif de cet article est de prolonger l'étude de la comparaison du caractère égalitaire du barème de l'impôt sur le revenu et des cotisations sociales sur la période 1959-1989, entreprise dans Trannoy et alii (1991, Economie et Prévision, Études de Fiscalité). L'étude a en commun avec la précédente de restreindre son attention à l'étude du cas-type du célibataire salarié. Mais cette fois, nous prenons en compte les cotisations sociales employeurs et distinguons les cotisations sociales "solidarité" des autres. L'autre enrichissement consiste dans l'obtention des résultats à partir de 4 échantillons de célibataires au sens fiscal pour les années 1984 et 1988. L'observation récurrente tient dans la domination au sens du critère de Lorenz des barèmes des années 1970, tantôt par ceux des années 1980, tantôt par ceux des années 1960 selon le cadre considéré. [spa] Evolución del carácter igualitario de las exacciones fîscalosociales durante la Quinta República : un complemento, . por Rachel Loquet, Jerry Rafaliarison y Alain Trannoy.. . El objetivo de este artículo consiste en prolongar el estudio de la comparución del carácter igualitario del baremo del impuesto sobre la renta y de las cotizaciones sociales durante el período 1959-1989, emprendida por Trannoy y col.(1991 Economie et Prévisions Etudes de Fiscalité). El estudio tiene en común con el precedente limitar su atención al estudio del caso típico del soltero asalariado. Pero, en este caso, los autores tienen en cuenta las cotizaciones sociales patronales y se establece la diferencia entre las cotizaciones sociales "solidaridad" y las demás cotizaciones. Otro enriquecimiento consiste en la obtención de los resultados por medio de cuatro muestras de solteros en su acepción fiscal, para los años 84 y 88. La observación recurrente se relaciona directamente con la dominación según el sentido dado por Lorenz de los baremos de los años 70, unas veces por aquellos de los años 80, y otras veces por aquellos de los años 60, según el contexto considerado. [ger] Die Entvvicklung der egalitären Ausgestaltung der Steuei abzüge und Sozialabgaben unter der Fünf ten Republik in Frankreich: eine ergänzende Untersuchung, . von Rachel Loquet, Jerry Rafaliarison, Alain Trannoy.. . Mit diesem Artikel soil die komparative Untersuchung der egalitären Ausrichtung der Einkommensteuer- und der Sozialbeitragssätze im Zeitraum von 1959-1989 fortgesetzt werden, die Trannoy und alii in "Economie et Prévisions, 1991, Etudes de Fiscalité" vornahmen. Wie in der vorausgegangenen Studie liegt der Schwerpunkt auf der Untersuchung des typischen Falles des unverheirateten Arbeitnehmers. In diesem Artikel berücksichtigen wir jedoch die Sozialbeiträge der Arbeitgeber und unterscheiden zwischen den "Solidaritäts-Sozialbeiträgen" und den anderen Sozialabgaben. Eine weitere Bereicherung stellen die Ergebnisse dar, die man mit 4 Stichproben von im steuerrechtlichen Sinne unverheirateten Personen fur die Jahre 1984 und l988 erhält. Die rekurrierende Beobachtung beruht auf der Dominanz im Sinne des Lorenz-Kriteriums der Sätze der 70er Jahre durch, je nach berücksichtigtem Rahmen, entweder die der 80er Jahre oder die der 60er Jahre.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Loquet & Jerry Rafaliarison & Alain Trannoy, 1993. "L'évolution du caractère égalitaire du prélèvement fiscalo-social sous la cinquième République : un complément," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 110(4), pages 81-104.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1993_num_110_4_5636
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.1993.5636
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1993.5636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.1993.5636
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_1993_num_110_4_5636
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.1993.5636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davies, James & Hoy, Michael, 1995. "Making Inequality Comparisons When Lorenz Curves Intersect," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(4), pages 980-986, September.
    2. Anthony F. Shorrocks & James E. Foster, 1987. "Transfer Sensitive Inequality Measures," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 54(3), pages 485-497.
    3. Kathy Hayes & Peter Lambert & Daniel Slottje, "undated". "Evaluating Impact Effects of Tax Reforms," Discussion Papers 93/10, Department of Economics, University of York.
    4. Lambert, Peter J, 1993. "Evaluating Impact Effects of Tax Reforms," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(3), pages 205-242, September.
    5. Sen, Amartya K, 1976. "Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(2), pages 219-231, March.
    6. Le Breton, M. & Moyes, P. & Trannoy, A., 1993. "Equalizing Taxation Schemes," Papers 9306, Paris X - Nanterre, U.F.R. de Sc. Ec. Gest. Maths Infor..
    7. Atkinson, Anthony B., 1970. "On the measurement of inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 244-263, September.
    8. Jakobsson, Ulf, 1976. "On the measurement of the degree of progression," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1-2), pages 161-168.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rolf Aaberge, 2009. "Ranking intersecting Lorenz curves," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(2), pages 235-259, August.
    2. Davies, James B. & Hoy, Michael, 2002. "Flat rate taxes and inequality measurement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 33-46, April.
    3. Louis Kaplow, 2005. "Why measure inequality?," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 3(1), pages 65-79, April.
    4. Rolf Aaberge & Magne Mogstad, 2011. "Robust inequality comparisons," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(3), pages 353-371, September.
    5. E. Savaglio, 2002. "Inequality Criteria, Transfers and their Representations," THEMA Working Papers 2002-04, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    6. Higgins, Sean & Lustig, Nora, 2016. "Can a poverty-reducing and progressive tax and transfer system hurt the poor?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 63-75.
    7. Stephen P. Jenkins & John Micklewright, 2007. "New Directions in the Analysis of Inequality and Poverty," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 700, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Casilda Lasso de la Vega & Ana Urrutia, 2008. "The ‘Extended’ Atkinson family: The class of multiplicatively decomposable inequality measures, and some new graphical procedures for analysts," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 6(2), pages 211-225, June.
    9. W. Henry Chiu, 2021. "Intersecting Lorenz curves and aversion to inverse downside inequality," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(3), pages 487-508, April.
    10. Francesco Andreoli & Claudio Zoli, 2020. "From unidimensional to multidimensional inequality: a review," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 78(1), pages 5-42, April.
    11. John Quiggin & Renuka Mahadevan, 2015. "The poverty burden: a measure of the difficulty of ending extreme poverty," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 167-177, April.
    12. Gayant, Jean-Pascal & Le Pape, Nicolas, 2017. "Increasing Nth degree inequality," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 185-189.
    13. Peter Lambert, 2008. "Tony Atkinson's 1973 manuscript “More on the measurement of inequality”," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 6(3), pages 275-276, September.
    14. Claudio Zoli, 2002. "Inverse stochastic dominance, inequality measurement and Gini indices," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 77(1), pages 119-161, December.
    15. Rolf Aaberge, 2003. "Mean-Spread-Preserving Transformations," Discussion Papers 360, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    16. Sreenivasan Subramanian, 2004. "Indicators of Inequality and Poverty," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2004-25, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Dipesh Gangopadhyay & Robert B. Nielsen & Velma Zahirovic-Herbert, 2021. "Methodology and Axiomatic Characterization of a Multidimensional and Fuzzy Measure of Deprivation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 1-37, January.
    18. Gian Maria Tomat, 2014. "Revisiting poverty and welfare dominance," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 125-149.
    19. Charles Beach, 2022. "Better Off or More Apart? Empirically Testing Welfare and Inequality Dominance Criteria," Working Paper 1484, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    20. Patrick Moyes & Alain Trannoy, 1999. "Le quotient familial : une structure fiscale cohérente avec le critère de Lorenz relatif," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 138(2), pages 111-124.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1993_num_110_4_5636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.