IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlefa/v2017y2017i2id182p73-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Auditor Have a Direct Influence on the Financial Statement Quality?

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Dolgikh

Abstract

In the modern process of globalization, IFRS standards are widely used in the financial world, Russian Federation is one of these examples. The application of IFRS in Russian Federation first began in the early 90-ies of the twentieth century. During IFRS adoption many companies were involved in this process. Nowadays, a big part of all Russian companies obligatory use IFRS standards to prepare their statements. The purpose of this article is to analyse current practices of financial reporting procedures, its compliance with the rules of the IAS 1 as well as identifying the dependencies between the auditor selection and the quality of reporting. For this paper, a special Questionnaire was developed and for each selected organization a special profile, which included analysis of all financial statements for the period of the 2015 year was created. The study shows that the financial reports quality of the largest Russian companies on a high level. However, many companies face the problem of RAS and IFRS differences during reports transformation that directly influences its quality. During the study process it becomes clear, that auditor has a direct impact on the financial statements quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Dolgikh, 2017. "Does the Auditor Have a Direct Influence on the Financial Statement Quality?," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(2), pages 73-90.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlefa:v:2017:y:2017:i:2:id:182:p:73-90
    DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://efaj.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.efaj.182.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://efaj.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.efaj.182.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.efaj.182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatiana Dolgikh, 2017. "The IFRS Adoption by BRICS Countries: A Comparative Analysis," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: David Procházka (ed.), New Trends in Finance and Accounting, chapter 0, pages 373-383, Springer.
    2. Iwasaki, Ichiro & 岩﨑, 一郎, 2013. "What Determines Audit Independence and Expertise in Russia? Firm-Level Evidence," RRC Working Paper Series 27_v2, Russian Research Center, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    3. Alon, Anna & Dwyer, Peggy D., 2014. "Early Adoption of IFRS as a Strategic Response to Transnational and Local Influences," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 348-370.
    4. Kim, Oksana, 2013. "Russian Accounting System: Value Relevance of Reported Information and the IFRS Adoption Perspective," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 525-547.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Oksana, 2016. "The IFRS Adoption Reform through the Lens of Neoinstitutionalism: The Case of the Russian Federation," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 345-362.
    2. Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2017. "IFRS and Saudi accounting standards: a critical investigation," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(3), pages 191-206, August.
    3. Ichiro Iwasaki, 2018. "Corporate Governance System and Regional Heterogeneity: Evidence from East and West Russia," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 391-420, September.
    4. Maigoshi, Zaharaddeen Salisu & Latif, Rohaida Abdul & Kamardin, Hasnah, 2018. "Change in value-relevance of disclosed RPT across accounting regimes: Evidence from Malaysia," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 422-433.
    5. Iwasaki, Ichiro & 岩﨑, 一郎, 2016. "The Evolution of Corporate Governance in the Global Financial Crisis : The Case of Russian Industrial Firms," CEI Working Paper Series 2016-7, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    6. David Alexander & Anna Alon, 2017. "Layering of IFRS and Dual Institutionality of Accounting Standards in Belarus," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 261-278, September.
    7. Mantzari, Elisavet & Georgiou, Omiros, 2019. "Ideological hegemony and consent to IFRS: Insights from practitioners in Greece," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 70-93.
    8. Iwasaki, Ichiro & Kim, Byung-Yeon, 2018. "Firm Failure in Russia during Economic Crises and Growth : A Large Survival Analysis," RRC Working Paper Series 76, Russian Research Center, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    9. Khan, Habib Zaman & Bose, Sudipta & Johns, Raechel, 2020. "Regulatory influences on CSR practices within banks in an emerging economy: Do banks merely comply?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Jude Edeigba & Christopher Gan & Felix Amenkhienan, 2020. "The influence of cultural diversity on the convergence of IFRS: evidence from Nigeria IFRS implementation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 105-121, July.
    11. Tatiana Dolgikh, 2022. "IFRS Adoption and the Financial Statements Comparability: The Case of Russia and Canada," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 7-24.
    12. Alon, Anna & Dwyer, Peggy D., 2016. "SEC's acceptance of IFRS-based financial reporting: An examination based in institutional theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-16.
    13. Miriam Koning & Gerard Mertens & Peter Roosenboom, 2018. "Drivers of institutional change around the world: The case of IFRS," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(3), pages 249-271, April.
    14. Haapamäki, Elina & Sihvonen, Jukka, 2019. "Research on International Standards on Auditing: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 37-56.
    15. Pham Tien Dat & Kim Quoc Trung Nguyen, 2023. "Foreign ownership and national governance quality affect liquidity risk – case in Vietnam," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 2244752-224, December.
    16. Ambrose Egwuonwu & Suman Lodh & Monomita Nandy, 2023. "Stock co‐movement and governance bundles: Does the quality of national governance moderate this relationship?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2530-2548, July.
    17. Nadia Sbei Trabelsi & Mohamed Trabelsi, 2014. "The Value Relevance of IFRS in the UAE Banking Industry: Empirical Evidence from Dubai Financial Market, 2008-2013," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(4), pages 60-71, October.
    18. Golubeva, Olga, 2023. "Accounting for transition: A literature review," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Reports; Quality; IFRS; Russian Companies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlefa:v:2017:y:2017:i:2:id:182:p:73-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.