IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pwat00/0000129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A tale of two communities: Comparing user perceptions of condominial and conventional sewer systems in Salvador, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Fabiana Almerinda G Palma
  • Jonatas Fernandes Araújo Sodré
  • Nivison Nery Jr
  • Luciana Joaquim Oliveira
  • Joe Brown
  • Anu Bourgeois
  • Claire A Spears
  • Cassandra White
  • Federico Costa
  • Christine E Stauber

Abstract

Problems of access and quality of sanitary sewage disproportionately impact the health of populations in urban peripheries of low-and middle-income countries. The condominial sewer system is a practical, low-cost, effective, and simplified engineering approach compared to conventional sewer systems. In support of meeting the sanitation needs in highly populated urban settings, there is a need to understand the residents’ perceptions regarding the advantages and disadvantages of this sanitation model compared to conventional sewer systems. We conducted a cross-sectional study from September to December 2021 in two urban communities of Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, where condominial and conventional sewer systems had been implemented in the last five years. Of the 203 residents we interviewed, 50.7% lived in a site served by a condominial sewer system. Residents in the condominial sewer site reported not connecting to public sewage network (23.7% vs. 11.2%; p = 0.022) more often than in the conventional site. They reported more collective action to solve urban sanitation problems (69.9% vs. 54.0%; p = 0.020), such as manhole cleaning and unclogging efforts to fix plumbing. Despite these challenges, these residents expressed that the current service quality is better than it was in the previous two years. Our results suggest that even within urban periphery communities of a large Brazilian city, disparities exist in access to and quality of sanitation services that may be linked to sewage system implementation. Implementing simplified sewer systems is important to meet the growing sanitation demands of urban areas. However, these systems should also play a role in reducing sanitation disparities and the adoption of participatory approaches to meet the needs of populations in the most disadvantaged conditions. Despite challenging conditions, there is the potential for community engagement and active participation in sanitation-related matters, which could enhance the implementation and long-term sustainability of these systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabiana Almerinda G Palma & Jonatas Fernandes Araújo Sodré & Nivison Nery Jr & Luciana Joaquim Oliveira & Joe Brown & Anu Bourgeois & Claire A Spears & Cassandra White & Federico Costa & Christine E S, 2023. "A tale of two communities: Comparing user perceptions of condominial and conventional sewer systems in Salvador, Brazil," PLOS Water, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pwat00:0000129
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/water/article?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000129
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/water/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000129&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McGranahan, Gordon, 2015. "Realizing the Right to Sanitation in Deprived Urban Communities: Meeting the Challenges of Collective Action, Coproduction, Affordability, and Housing Tenure," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 242-253.
    2. McGranahan, Gordon & Mitlin, Diana, 2016. "Learning from Sustained Success: How Community-Driven Initiatives to Improve Urban Sanitation Can Meet the Challenges," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 307-317.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahsa Mesgar & Diego Ramirez-Lovering & Mohamed El-Sioufi, 2021. "Tension, Conflict, and Negotiability of Land for Infrastructure Retrofit Practices in Informal Settlements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Sheillah Simiyu & Mark Swilling & Richard Rheingans & Sandy Cairncross, 2017. "Estimating the Cost and Payment for Sanitation in the Informal Settlements of Kisumu, Kenya: A Cross Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Sinharoy, Sheela S. & Pittluck, Rachel & Clasen, Thomas, 2019. "Review of drivers and barriers of water and sanitation policies for urban informal settlements in low-income and middle-income countries," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Revilla, Ma. Laarni D. & Qu, Fangqi & Seetharam, K E & Rao, Bhanoji, 2021. "“Sanitation” in the Top Development Journals: A Review," ADBI Working Papers 1253, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    5. Chidambaram, Soundarya, 2020. "How do institutions and infrastructure affect mobilization around public toilets vs. piped water? Examining intra-slum patterns of collective action in Delhi, India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Valette, Héloïse & Colon, Marine, 2024. "Institutional change for the development of urban sanitation in the Global South: A social science review," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Marine Colon & Thierry Rieu & Pierre Bauby & Laurent Bibard & Christian Binz & Olivier Crespi- Reghizzi & Shubhagato Dasgupta & Sam Drabble & Amal Ennabih & Lætitia Guérin-Schneider & Miriam Hacker & , 2022. "Overcoming Institutional and Organisational Barriers to Sanitation: What's New? [Surmonter les barrières institutionnelles et organisationnelles à l'assainissement: quoi de neuf ?]," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-04986717, HAL.
    8. Marine Colon & Thierry Rieu & Pierre Bauby & Laurent Bibard & Christian Binz & Olivier Crespi- Reghizzi & Shubhagato Dasgupta & Sam Drabble & Amal Ennabih & Lætitia Guérin-Schneider & Miriam Hacker & , 2022. "Overcoming Institutional and Organisational Barriers to Sanitation: What's New? [Surmonter les barrières institutionnelles et organisationnelles à l'assainissement: quoi de neuf ?]," Post-Print hal-04986717, HAL.
    9. Basu, Tirthankar & Das, Arijit, 2020. "Identification of backward district in India by applying the principal component analysis and fuzzy approach: A census based study," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Saraswat, Deepak, 2024. "Gender composition of children and sanitation behavior in India," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    11. Adrian Mallory & Anna Mdee & Dorice Agol & Leonie Hyde‐Smith & Domenic Kiogora & Joy Riungu & Alison Parker, 2022. "The potential for scaling up container‐based sanitation in informal settlements in Kenya," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), pages 1347-1361, October.
    12. Samantha C. Winter & Lena Moraa Obara & Francis Barchi, 2019. "Environmental Correlates of Health-Related Quality of Life among Women Living in Informal Settlements in Kenya," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Emmy De Buck & Hans Van Remoortel & Karin Hannes & Thashlin Govender & Selvan Naidoo & Bert Avau & Axel Vande Veegaete & Alfred Musekiwa & Vittoria Lutje & Margaret Cargo & Hans‐Joachim Mosler & Phili, 2017. "Approaches to promote handwashing and sanitation behaviour change in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a mixed method systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-447.
    14. Brown, Alison, 2015. "Claiming the Streets: Property Rights and Legal Empowerment in the Urban Informal Economy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 238-248.
    15. John Nana Francois & Johnson Kakeu & Cristelle Kouame, 2021. "Do Better Institutions Broaden Access To Sanitation In Sub‐Sahara Africa?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(2), pages 435-452, April.
    16. Nelson, Paul J. & Dorsey, Ellen, 2018. "Who practices rights-based development? A progress report on work at the nexus of human rights and development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 97-107.
    17. Mahbub-Ul Alam & Fazle Sharior & Sharika Ferdous & Atik Ahsan & Tanvir Ahmed & Ayesha Afrin & Supta Sarker & Farhana Akand & Rownak Jahan Archie & Kamrul Hasan & Rosie Renouf & Sam Drabble & Guy Norma, 2020. "Strategies to Connect Low-Income Communities with the Proposed Sewerage Network of the Dhaka Sanitation Improvement Project, Bangladesh: A Qualitative Assessment of the Perspectives of Stakeholders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Lucci, Paula & Bhatkal, Tanvi & Khan, Amina, 2018. "Are we underestimating urban poverty?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 297-310.
    19. Zakaria A. Mani & Krzysztof Goniewicz, 2023. "Adapting Disaster Preparedness Strategies to Changing Climate Patterns in Saudi Arabia: A Rapid Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    20. McGranahan, Gordon & Mitlin, Diana, 2016. "Learning from Sustained Success: How Community-Driven Initiatives to Improve Urban Sanitation Can Meet the Challenges," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 307-317.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pwat00:0000129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: water (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/water .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.