IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353232.html

The best time to become a parent: The relationship between tenure and fertility among academics

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Gorodetskaya
  • Agnese Vitali
  • Valentina Tocchioni
  • Alessandra Minello

Abstract

The interplay between career progression and fertility remains a central theme in the scholarly debate on academia. Past research has largely examined the influence of parenthood on academic careers, revealing a motherhood penalty for women and mixed results for men. The converse—whether and how career advancements shape fertility decisions—remains underexplored. This contribution pioneers the study of the relationship between academic career progression, specifically tenure attainment, and fertility for academic women and men. Drawing on unique primary data from a large sample of Italian academics, this study employs discrete-time event-history models to analyze transitions to first and second childbirths, and logistic regression models to assess short-term fertility intentions by career stage and gender. Results reveal that job stability facilitates the transition to parenthood: tenure significantly increases the hazard of becoming a parent for men and, when obtained before age 35, for women. Tenure also significantly boosts short-term fertility intentions among childless women. Instead, tenure is unrelated to the transition to a second birth for either women or men. The positive association between tenure and fertility raises important concerns. Gender differences in the upper age limits to fecundity translate into shorter reproductive lifespans for women than for men. In academia, these differences are exacerbated by women’s later age of promotion compared to men. This results in a considerably shorter post-tenure fertility window for women, leading to higher rates of childlessness and lower fertility compared to men. Policies aimed at reducing gender disparities in academia should address these differences in fertility by supporting academic women in transitioning to parenthood.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Gorodetskaya & Agnese Vitali & Valentina Tocchioni & Alessandra Minello, 2026. "The best time to become a parent: The relationship between tenure and fertility among academics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353232
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353232
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353232&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott Daewon Kim & Petra Moser, 2021. "Women in Science. Lessons from the Baby Boom," NBER Working Papers 29436, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Hartman, Erin & Huang, Melody, 2024. "Sensitivity Analysis for Survey Weights," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schuessler, Julian, 2024. "Causal analysis with observational data," OSF Preprints wam94, Center for Open Science.
    2. Melody Huang & Cory McCartan, 2025. "Relative Bias Under Imperfect Identification in Observational Causal Inference," Papers 2507.23743, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2026.
    3. Baltrunaite, Audinga & Casarico, Alessandra & Rizzica, Lucia, 2025. "Women in economics: The role of gendered references at entry in the profession," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Francesca Truffa & Ashley Wong, 2024. "Undergraduate Gender Diversity and the Direction of Scientific Research," CESifo Working Paper Series 11294, CESifo.
    5. Okuyama, Yoko & Murooka, Takeshi & Yamaguchi, Shintaro, 2025. "Unpacking the Child Penalty Using Personnel Data: How Promotion Practices Widen the Gender Pay Gap," IZA Discussion Papers 17673, IZA Network @ LISER.
    6. Sabrina Di Addario & Michela Giorcelli & Agata Maida, 2024. "Women Inventors: The Legacy of Medieval Guilds," Development Working Papers 500, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano.
    7. repec:osf:osfxxx:wam94_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Bor, Jacob & Venkataramani, Atheendar & Williams, David & Tsai, Alexander, 2024. "Reply to McCrain, Adams, Nix, and Del Pozo (2024), "Reconsidering a prominent finding on the spillover effects of police killings of unarmed Black Americans"," SocArXiv 6hx5p, Center for Open Science.
    9. Datta, Deepa D. & Tzur-Ilan, Nitzan, 2025. "Gender Gaps in the Federal Reserve System," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. Heng Chen & John Tsang, 2025. "Correcting Selection Bias in a Non-Probability Two-Phase Payment Survey," Staff Working Papers 25-17, Bank of Canada.
    11. Ejermo, Olof & Sofer, Yotam, 2024. "When colleges graduate: Micro-level effects on publications and scientific organization," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
    12. Elodie Carpentier & Jennifer Brant & Utsav Bahl & Aikaterini Kanellia, 2024. "Closing Innovation and Intellectual Property Diversity Gaps: a Global Literature Review," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 86, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    13. Healy, Olivia & Heissel, Jennifer A., 2024. "Baby Bumps in the Road: The Impact of Parenthood on Job Performance, Human Capital, and Career Advancement," IZA Discussion Papers 16743, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Ivan Paunovic & Cathleen Müller & Klaus Deimel, 2023. "Citizen Participation for Sustainability and Resilience: A Generational Cohort Perspective on Community Brand Identity Perceptions and Development Priorities in a Rural Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.