IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352865.html

Cost-effectiveness of a mentalisation-based treatment for antisocial personality disorder in males convicted of an offence on community probation in England and Wales: Multicentre, assessor-blind randomised controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Barrett
  • Elizabeth Simes
  • Karen Yirmiya
  • James M S Wason
  • Alison Frater
  • Angus Cameron
  • Stephen Butler
  • Zoe Hoare
  • Mary McMurran
  • Paul Moran
  • Mike Crawford
  • Stephen Pilling
  • Elizabeth Allison
  • Jessica Yakeley
  • Anthony Bateman
  • Peter Fonagy

Abstract

This study addresses a critical gap in the evidence base for cost-effective psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) in forensic settings by presenting a full trial-based economic evaluation of mentalisation-based treatment plus probation as usual (MBT-ASPD + PAU), compared to PAU alone, for males with ASPD convicted of an offence in England and Wales. The economic evaluation adopted a societal perspective, incorporating costs to health care, the criminal justice system, and the wider societal impact of offending. Outcomes were assessed 24 months post-randomisation. The primary cost–utility analysis compared costs with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-5L, while a secondary cost-effectiveness analysis compared costs with aggression outcomes measured by the Overt Aggression Scale – Modified (OAS-M). Although missing data limited definitive conclusions regarding service use, available data suggest that participants in the PAU group spent more time in custody than those in the MBT-ASPD + PAU group. Utility scores and quality of life showed minimal variation over follow-up, with no significant differences between groups. Overall costs were lower in the MBT-ASPD + PAU group, though not statistically significant. Over the 24-month period, MBT-ASPD + PAU was associated with both reduced costs and lower aggression (as reflected in OAS-M scores), indicating that each unit reduction in aggression yielded a cost saving of approximately £93. For QALYs, MBT-ASPD + PAU appeared cost-effective compared to PAU across all values a decision-maker may be willing to pay for improvements in outcome. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the potential economic value of MBT-ASPD + PAU in a forensic ASPD population, particularly in relation to aggression reduction and the associated cost savings.Trial registrationThis trial is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN 32309003).

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Barrett & Elizabeth Simes & Karen Yirmiya & James M S Wason & Alison Frater & Angus Cameron & Stephen Butler & Zoe Hoare & Mary McMurran & Paul Moran & Mike Crawford & Stephen Pilling & Elizab, 2026. "Cost-effectiveness of a mentalisation-based treatment for antisocial personality disorder in males convicted of an offence on community probation in England and Wales: Multicentre, assessor-blind randomised controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352865
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352865
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352865&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352865?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.