IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0345071.html

Forecasting auditor’s going concern opinion using with hybrid robust machine learning model

Author

Listed:
  • Uğur Ejder
  • Alpaslan Yaşar

Abstract

The importance of forecasting company bankruptcies makes the auditor’s reporting of the going concern opinion (GCO) a focal point for interested parties. Therefore, researchers have recently turned to predicting GCO using various machine learning (ML) methods. The aim of this research is to propose a novel hybrid model that integrates ML models to enhance the prediction accuracy of the system. We use a combination of traditional (classical) and hybrid ML approaches to identify the superior model among 30 models based on empirical data of Turkish companies listed on Borsa Istanbul (BIST) for the period 2017–2021. Given that the distribution of classes in the analysed dataset is balanced, it can be confidently stated that the research is reliable. The ML models are selected in accordance with the non-linear system since the equation system under consideration is the non-linear system. To minimise deviations and errors caused by distribution and fragmentation, the k-fold method is used to separate the training and test data sets. The experimental results show that the Random Forest based AdaBoost hybrid model outperforms traditional and other hybrid ML models in terms of accuracy by 89%.

Suggested Citation

  • Uğur Ejder & Alpaslan Yaşar, 2026. "Forecasting auditor’s going concern opinion using with hybrid robust machine learning model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345071
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345071
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0345071&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0345071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hian Koh & Sen Tan, 1999. "A neural network approach to the prediction of going concern status," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 211-216.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pablo de Llano Monelos & Manuel Rodríguez López & Carlos Piñeiro Sánchez, 2013. "Bankruptcy Prediction Models in Galician companies. Application of Parametric Methodologies and Artificial Intelligence," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 117-136.
    2. Mark T. Leung & An-Sing Chen, 2005. "Performance evaluation of neural network architectures: the case of predicting foreign exchange correlations," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(6), pages 403-420.
    3. Ruey-Ching Hwang & K. F. Cheng & Jack C. Lee, 2007. "A semiparametric method for predicting bankruptcy," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(5), pages 317-342.
    4. Chen Jo-Hui & Diaz John Francis T., 2021. "Application of grey relational analysis and artificial neural networks on currency exchange-traded notes (ETNs)," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 25(2), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Stuart, Iris & Shin, Yong-Chul & Cram, Donald P. & Karan, Vijay, 2013. "Review of choice-based, matched, and other stratified sample studies in auditing research," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 88-113.
    6. Moll, Jodie & Yigitbasioglu, Ogan, 2019. "The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    7. Marius Hasslinger & Michael Olbrich & David Rapp, 2017. "Concerned about Going Concern: When do Entities in Liquidation have to be Considered a Non-Going Concern According to IFRS?," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 31-61.
    8. Robert G. Biscontri, 2012. "A Radial Basis Function Approach To Earnings Forecast," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(1), pages 1-18, January.
    9. fernández, María t. Tascón & gutiérrez, Francisco J. Castaño, 2012. "Variables y Modelos Para La Identificación y Predicción Del Fracaso Empresarial: Revisión de La Investigación Empírica Reciente," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 7-58.
    10. Laskai András, 2019. "AI foundations of the international business planning and the AI consciousness model," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 3(1), pages 17-28.
    11. Amani, Farzaneh A. & Fadlalla, Adam M., 2017. "Data mining applications in accounting: A review of the literature and organizing framework," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 32-58.
    12. Yusuf Ali Al-Hroot, 2016. "A Comparison of Jordanian Bankruptcy Models: Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network and Discriminant Analysis," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(12), pages 121-130, December.
    13. Thomas E. McKee, 2003. "Rough sets bankruptcy prediction models versus auditor signalling rates," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(8), pages 569-586.
    14. Lin, Chin-Shien & Khan, Haider A. & Chang, Ruei-Yuan & Wang, Ying-Chieh, 2008. "A new approach to modeling early warning systems for currency crises: Can a machine-learning fuzzy expert system predict the currency crises effectively?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 1098-1121, November.
    15. Llano Monelos Pablo De & Piñeiro Sánchez Carlos & Rodríguez López Manuel, 2014. "DEA as a business failure prediction tool. Application to the case of galician SMEs," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 59(2), pages 65-96, abril-jun.
    16. Nicoleta Bărbuță-Mișu & Mara Madaleno, 2020. "Assessment of Bankruptcy Risk of Large Companies: European Countries Evolution Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, March.
    17. Sabek Amine, 2023. "Unveiling the diverse efficacy of artificial neural networks and logistic regression: A comparative analysis in predicting financial distress," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 16-32, July.
    18. Lee, E.Jin & Tahmoush, Dave, 2025. "Auditors’ decision-making aid for going concern audit opinions through machine learning analysis," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    19. Nirosh Karuppu, 2009. "Evidence on Auditors Use of Business Continuity Models as an Analytical Procedure," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 1(1), pages 63-74.
    20. Yusuf Ali Al-Hroot, 2015. "The Influence Of Sample Size And Selection Of Financial Ratios In Bankruptcy Model Accuracy," Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, University of Tuzla, Faculty of Economics, vol. 13(1), pages 7-19, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0345071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.