IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0340550.html

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Emily A Kiernan
  • Jakina Debnam Guzman

Abstract

How do the social features of payment forms shape willingness to pay (WTP)? We conduct a purchasing experiment during Covid-19 in which 261 U.S. undergraduates are randomly assigned a payment form in which to complete a real transaction – either via debit card, credit card, or via one of the payment visibility settings within Venmo. We then elicit both stated preferences and WTP for ten household items. We find that the previously documented digital payment premium only persists when transactions are either private or are visible to the public at-large. When transactions are visible only to participants’ friends, however, we find a large decrease in their WTP consistent with impression management when peers are frugal. We find that viewing others’ transactions increases the magnitude of this effect. Payment visibility matters for WTP, but causes no differences in stated preference. These findings highlight the importance of considering social features of payment forms in addition to more well-documented features such as convenience, transparency and pain of payment.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily A Kiernan & Jakina Debnam Guzman, 2026. "Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340550
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340550
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340550&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0340550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.