IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of diagnosis-related groups on medical costs, service efficiency, and healthcare quality in Meishan, China: An interrupted time series analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jinyuan Li
  • Meihua Peng
  • Shihu Deng
  • Jingwen Wu
  • Wangsu Zhou

Abstract

Background: In January 2019, the Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) payment system was introduced in Meishan, China. Using the medical insurance records from 2017 to 2022, we evaluated the impact of the DRG system on medical costs, service efficiency and healthcare quality. Methods: The sample was divided into three periods: Before DRG reform (2017–2018), the first period of DRG reform (2019–2020), and the second period of DRG reform (2021–2022). We employed an Interrupted Time Series (ITS) model to analyze the monthly changes in total hospital costs, patient cost-sharing, patient sharing ratio, length of stay, and 30-day readmission rate during both periods of DRG reform. Results: In the first period of DRG reform, total hospital costs decreased by 1.23% per month (95% CI, 0.88%-1.59%), patient cost-sharing decreased by 1.46% per month (95% CI, 1.09%-1.83%), patient sharing ratio decreased by 0.23% per month (95% CI, 0.06%-0.40%), and length of stay decreased by 0.56% per month (95% CI, 0.27%-0.84%). The monthly change in 30-day readmission rate was not statistically significant (-0.11%, 95% CI, -0.73%-0.50%). In the second period of DRG reform, all monthly changes were not statistically significant. Conclusions: This study assessed the impact of the DRG payment system on medical costs and service efficiency. The results showed that DRG reduced total hospital costs, patient cost-sharing, patient sharing ratio, and length of stay, but did not significantly affect the rising 30-day readmission rates. Over time, the impact of DRG on cost control and service efficiency stabilized. However, unintended hospital behaviors may have emerged, warranting further investigation. The findings suggest that policymakers should strengthen clinical practice regulation, improve the DRG payment system, and continuously monitor healthcare quality trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinyuan Li & Meihua Peng & Shihu Deng & Jingwen Wu & Wangsu Zhou, 2025. "The impact of diagnosis-related groups on medical costs, service efficiency, and healthcare quality in Meishan, China: An interrupted time series analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325041
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325041
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325041&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duckett, Stephen J., 1995. "Hospital payment arrangements to encourage efficiency: the case of Victoria, Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 113-134, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van de Vijsel, Aart R. & Engelfriet, Peter M. & Westert, Gert P., 2011. "Rendering hospital budgets volume based and open ended to reduce waiting lists: Does it work?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 60-70, April.
    2. Gong, Zhiping & Duckett, Stephen J. & Legge, David G. & Pei, Likun, 2004. "Describing Chinese hospital activity with diagnosis related groups (DRGs): A case study in Chengdu," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 93-100, July.
    3. Cots, Francesc & Elvira, David & Castells, Xavier & Dalmau, Eulalia, 2000. "Medicare's DRG-weights in a European environment: the Spanish experience," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 31-47, February.
    4. Steinbusch, Paul J.M. & Oostenbrink, Jan B. & Zuurbier, Joost J. & Schaepkens, Frans J.M., 2007. "The risk of upcoding in casemix systems: A comparative study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(2-3), pages 289-299, May.
    5. Jackson, Terri, 2001. "Using computerised patient-level costing data for setting DRG weights: the Victorian (Australia) cost weight studies," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 149-163, May.
    6. Richard Madden & Nicola Fortune & Julie Gordon, 2022. "Health Statistics in Australia: What We Know and Do Not Know," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-12, April.
    7. Baxter, Pamela E. & Hewko, Sarah J. & Pfaff, Kathryn A. & Cleghorn, Laura & Cunningham, Barbara J. & Elston, Dawn & Cummings, Greta G., 2015. "Leaders’ experiences and perceptions implementing activity-based funding and pay-for-performance hospital funding models: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(8), pages 1096-1110.
    8. Meng, Qingyue & Rehnberg, Clas & Zhuang, Ning & Bian, Ying & Tomson, Goran & Tang, Shenglan, 2004. "The impact of urban health insurance reform on hospital charges: a case study from two cities in China," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 197-209, May.
    9. Sverre Grepperud & Pål Andreas Pedersen, 2020. "Accreditation in regulated markets," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(7), pages 1287-1304, October.
    10. Annear, Peter Leslie & Kwon, Soonman & Lorenzoni, Luca & Duckett, Stephen & Huntington, Dale & Langenbrunner, John C. & Murakami, Yuki & Shon, Changwoo & Xu, Ke, 2018. "Pathways to DRG-based hospital payment systems in Japan, Korea, and Thailand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(7), pages 707-713.
    11. Kathryn Antioch & Michael Walsh, 2004. "The risk-adjusted vision beyond casemix (DRG) funding in Australia," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 5(2), pages 95-109, May.
    12. Diane Dawson & Andrew Street, 1998. "Reference costs and the pursuit of efficiency in the 'new' NHS," Working Papers 161chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    13. Burau, Viola & Dahl, Hanne Marlene & Jensen, Lotte Groth & Lou, Stina, 2018. "Beyond Activity Based Funding. An experiment in Denmark," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(7), pages 714-721.
    14. Sutherland, Jason M. & Hellsten, Erik & Yu, Kevin, 2012. "Bundles: An opportunity to align incentives for continuing care in Canada?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 209-217.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.