IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the evolution and evaluation of Chinese sports industry policies based on intelligent analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaoyang Pan
  • Liang Ma

Abstract

In recent decades, with the support and traction of a number of key policy steps, the scale of China’s sports industry has achieved a new leap. The optimization of industrial structure has made new progress. From "nascent" to "strong", China’s sports industry grows in importance of the national economy. In the meantime, sport is a significant way to promote health. With the rapid growth of people’s requirements for sport and health, it is urgent to re-evaluate the past development path and formulate new directions so as to continuously improve and optimize the system. This study systematically sorts out China’s sports industry documents at different stages, and describes the focus of each stage and the overall evolution track. On this basis, text mining and quantitative evaluation being used to extract high-frequency words of sports industry documents, and a sports industry document evaluation system including 9 first-level indicators and 47 second-level indicators is established. In this study, text similarity analysis is used to realize intelligent PMC index analysis, which effectively improves the analysis efficiency and makes up for the deficiency of simple qualitative analysis. According to the study, China’s sports industry policies are scientific and effective. Combining with the development direction of industrial transformation, it provides ideas for the future adjustment and optimization of sports industry evolution path.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaoyang Pan & Liang Ma, 2025. "Research on the evolution and evaluation of Chinese sports industry policies based on intelligent analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316206
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316206
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316206&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bennett, Claude F., 1976. "Analyzing Impacts of Extension Programs," USDA Miscellaneous 355523, United States Department of Agriculture.
    2. Chai, Song & Zhang, Zhicong & Ge, Jianping, 2020. "Evolution of environmental policy for China's rare earths: Comparing central and local government policies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Borrás, Susana & Laatsit, Mart, 2019. "Towards system oriented innovation policy evaluation? Evidence from EU28 member states," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 312-321.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Gao, 2022. "The Belt and Road Initiative and cascading innovation in China’s domestic railway ecosystem," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(2), pages 236-258, June.
    2. Ricard Esparza-Masana, 2022. "Towards Smart Specialisation 2.0. Main Challenges When Updating Strategies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 635-655, March.
    3. Feng-Shang Wu & Hong-Ji Huang, 2024. "Why Do Some Countries Innovate Better than Others? A New Perspective of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy Regimes and National Absorptive Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Ron Crawford, 2021. "Focused innovation policy: Lessons from international experience," Working Papers 2021/03, New Zealand Productivity Commission.
    5. Coburn, Josie & Bone, Frederique & Hopkins, Michael M. & Stirling, Andy & Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge & Arapostathis, Stathis & Llewelyn, Martin J., 2021. "Appraising research policy instrument mixes: a multicriteria mapping study in six European countries of diagnostic innovation to manage antimicrobial resistance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    6. Sun, Yutao & Jiang, Lin & Cao, Cong & Tseng, Fang-Mei, 2024. "From contributors to boundary spanners: Evolving roles of government agencies in China’s innovation policy network (1980–2019)," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    7. Colleen Kaiser & Michal Miedzinski & Will McDowall & Geoffrey R. McCarney, 2024. "Reflective Appraisal of Transformative Innovation Policy: Development of the Sustainability Transition and Innovation Review (STIR) Approach and Application to Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Song Wang & Jiexin Wang & Chenqi Wei & Xueli Wang & Fei Fan, 2021. "Collaborative innovation efficiency: From within cities to between cities—Empirical analysis based on innovative cities in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1330-1360, September.
    9. Chai, Song & Liu, Qiyun & Yang, Jin, 2023. "Renewable power generation policies in China: Policy instrument choices and influencing factors from the central and local government perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Aalto, Eero & Gustafsson, Robin, 2020. "Innovation Promotion Rationales and Impacts – A Review," ETLA Reports 99, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    11. Josie Coburn & Frederique Bone & Andy C. Stirling & Michael M. Hopkins & Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz & Stathis Arapostathis & Martin J. Llewelyn, 2021. "Appraising research policy instrument mixes: a multicriteria mapping study in six European countries of diagnostic innovation to manage antimicrobial resistance," SPRU Working Paper Series 2021-03, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    12. Reidl, Sybille & Beranek, Sarah & Holzinger, Florian & Streicher, Jürgen, 2020. "Gender equality regimes and evaluation regimes in Europe and their implications for policy design and evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    13. Hao, Xiaoli & Wen, Shufang & Li, Ke & Wu, Junwei & Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu, 2023. "Environmental governance, executive incentive, and enterprise performance: Evidence from Chinese mineral enterprises," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    14. Foreman-Peck, James & Zhou, Peng, 2022. "R&D subsidies and productivity in eastern European countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    15. Howoldt, David, 2024. "Characterising innovation policy mixes in innovation systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    16. L Carlos Freire-Gibb & Geoff Gregson, 2019. "Innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Implications for policy and practice in Latin America," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(8), pages 787-806, December.
    17. Fan, Wei & Yan, Ling & Chen, Boyang & Ding, Wangwang & Wang, Ping, 2022. "Environmental governance effects of local environmental protection expenditure in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Maping Zhang & Zongjun Wang & Xue Wang, 2023. "Configuration of Conditions Leading to High National Innovation Competitiveness: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    19. Kern, Florian & Rogge, Karoline S. & Howlett, Michael, 2019. "Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    20. Foreman-Peck, James & Zhou, Peng, 2021. "Innovation policy and performance of Eastern European Countries," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2021/15, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.