IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0315039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotion inference in conversations based on commonsense enhancement and graph structures

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanmin Zhang
  • Kexin Xu
  • Chunzhi Xie
  • Zhisheng Gao

Abstract

In the task of emotion inference, a common issue is the lack of common sense knowledge, particularly in the context of dialogue, where traditional research has failed to effectively extract structural features, resulting in lower accuracy in emotion inference. To address this, this paper proposes a dialogue emotion inference model based on Common Sense Enhancement and Graph Model (CEICG). This model integrates external common sense with graph model techniques by dynamically constructing nodes and defining diverse edge relations to simulate the evolution of dialogue, thereby effectively capturing the structural and semantic features of the conversation. The model employs two methods to incorporate external common sense into the graph model, overcoming the limitations of previous models in understanding complex dialogue structures and the absence of external knowledge. This strategy of integrating external common sense significantly enhances the model’s emotion inference capabilities, improving the understanding of emotions in dialogue. Experimental results demonstrate that the CEICG model outperforms six existing baseline models in emotion inference tasks across three datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanmin Zhang & Kexin Xu & Chunzhi Xie & Zhisheng Gao, 2024. "Emotion inference in conversations based on commonsense enhancement and graph structures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0315039
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0315039
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0315039&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0315039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emilio Ferrara & Zeyao Yang, 2015. "Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Rui & Xu, Ke & Zhao, Jichang, 2018. "An agent-based model for emotion contagion and competition in online social media," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 495(C), pages 245-259.
    2. Karunakaran, Arvind & Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2022. "Crowd-based accountability: examining how social media commentary reconfigures organizational accountability," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114401, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Plé, Loïc & Demangeot, Catherine, 2020. "Social contagion of online and offline deviant behaviors and its value outcomes: The case of tourism ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 886-896.
    4. Adena, Maja & Huck, Steffen, 2024. "Support for a right-wing populist party and subjective well-being: Experimental and survey evidence from Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19(6), pages 1-16.
    5. Hainan Huang & Weifan Chen & Tian Xie & Yaoyao Wei & Ziqing Feng & Weijiong Wu, 2021. "The Impact of Individual Behaviors and Governmental Guidance Measures on Pandemic-Triggered Public Sentiment Based on System Dynamics and Cross-Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Yifan Yu & Shan Huang & Yuchen Liu & Yong Tan, 2020. "Emotions in Online Content Diffusion," Papers 2011.09003, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    7. Gonzalo Luna-Cortés & Luis Miguel López-Bonilla & Jesús Manuel López-Bonilla, 2019. "The influence of social value and self-congruity on interpersonal connections in virtual social networks by Gen-Y tourists," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Lechner, Andreas T. & Paul, Michael, 2019. "Is this smile for real? The role of affect and thinking style in customer perceptions of frontline employee emotion authenticity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 195-208.
    9. Wu, Yanran & Wu, Shan & Xu, Fujia & Jiang, Jie, 2024. "Wisdom of crowds or awkward squad? Social interaction and the information efficiency of the Chinese capital market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Yara Kyrychenko & Tymofii Brik & Sander Linden & Jon Roozenbeek, 2024. "Social identity correlates of social media engagement before and after the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Qiong Wang & Xiao Luo & Ruilin Tu & Tao Xiao & Wei Hu, 2022. "COVID-19 Information Overload and Cyber Aggression during the Pandemic Lockdown: The Mediating Role of Depression/Anxiety and the Moderating Role of Confucian Responsibility Thinking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.
    12. R. Filieri & S. Shuqair & G. Viglia & A. Mattila & D. C. Pinto, 2023. "Leveraging online selling through social media influencers," Post-Print hal-04318902, HAL.
    13. Warkulat, Sonja & Pelster, Matthias, 2024. "Social media attention and retail investor behavior: Evidence from r/wallstreetbets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    14. Elizabeth Han & Dezhi Yin & Han Zhang, 2023. "Bots with Feelings: Should AI Agents Express Positive Emotion in Customer Service?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1296-1311, September.
    15. Thabang E. Mofokeng & Steven Mbeya & Daniel K. Maduku, 2024. "Bitcoin adoption in online payments: examining consumer intentions and word-of-mouth recommendations," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-30, December.
    16. Bartosz Wilczek, 2018. "Media use and life satisfaction: the moderating role of social events," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 65(2), pages 157-184, June.
    17. Airani, Rajeev & Karande, Kiran, 2022. "How social media effects shape sentiments along the twitter journey?A Bayesian network approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 988-997.
    18. Sabique Islam & Sirish Namilae & Richard Prazenica & Dahai Liu, 2020. "Fuel shortages during hurricanes: Epidemiological modeling and optimal control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Wojciech Charemza & Svetlana Makarova & Krzysztof Rybiński, 2023. "Anti-pandemic restrictions, uncertainty and sentiment in seven countries," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 1-27, February.
    20. Shuqair, Saleh & Filieri, Raffaele & Viglia, Giampaolo & Mattila, Anna S. & Costa Pinto, Diego, 2024. "Leveraging online selling through social media influencers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0315039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.