IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0304244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The All4Children project to assess the initial implementation of the Integrated Model of Family Foster Care in Portugal: A description of the study protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Joana Baptista
  • Helena Grangeia
  • Mariana Negrão
  • Cláudia Camilo
  • Sandra Ornelas
  • Sandra Nogueira
  • Isabel Pastor
  • Ana Gaspar
  • Isabel Soares
  • Stephanie Alves

Abstract

Background: The All4Children project addresses the urgent need to transition from institutionalization to family-based care for out-of-home children in Portugal. Despite evidence highlighting the detrimental effects of institutionalization, only a small percentage of children (less than 4%) are currently placed in family foster care in the country. In response to European directives for deinstitutionalization, Portuguese legislation now prioritizes non-kinship family foster care as the preferred alternative for young children in need of care. To facilitate this transition, the Integrated Model of Family Foster Care (MIAF) was developed, offering a comprehensive framework covering the entire spectrum of family foster care. Objective: This research aims to investigate the initial implementation stage of the MIAF to promote high-quality family foster care in Portugal. Method: The study will conduct a mixed-method and longitudinal research project in family foster care agencies across different regions of Portugal, focusing on evaluating the implementation and outcomes of the MIAF model using a multi-informant and multi-method approach. The participants will include caseworkers, children aged 0–9 years entering foster care, and their respective foster families enrolled in the MIAF program. Process evaluation will assess fidelity, feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of MIAF modules, while outcome evaluation will examine child safety, stability, well-being, as well as foster family well-being and quality of relational care. Outcomes: The insights gained from this research initiative will serve as a foundation for the ongoing enhancement of MIAF. Consequently, this project has the capacity to advance evidence-based child welfare practices by refining processes and strategies to better serve vulnerable children and youth. Conclusion: Facilitated by a multidisciplinary team, this project will contribute to advancing research in the field, enhancing practice, and informing policy during a pivotal stage of deinstitutionalization in Portugal.

Suggested Citation

  • Joana Baptista & Helena Grangeia & Mariana Negrão & Cláudia Camilo & Sandra Ornelas & Sandra Nogueira & Isabel Pastor & Ana Gaspar & Isabel Soares & Stephanie Alves, 2024. "The All4Children project to assess the initial implementation of the Integrated Model of Family Foster Care in Portugal: A description of the study protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304244
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304244
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304244&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0304244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vanschoonlandt, Femke & Vanderfaeillie, Johan & Van Holen, Frank & De Maeyer, Skrällan & Robberechts, Marijke, 2013. "Parenting stress and parenting behavior among foster mothers of foster children with externalizing problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 1742-1750.
    2. Barbee, Anita P. & Christensen, Dana & Antle, Becky & Wandersman, Abraham & Cahn, Katharine, 2011. "Successful adoption and implementation of a comprehensive casework practice model in a public child welfare agency: Application of the Getting to Outcomes (GTO) model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 622-633, May.
    3. Ball, Barbara & Sevillano, Lalaine & Faulkner, Monica & Belseth, Tymothy, 2021. "Agency, genuine support, and emotional connection: Experiences that promote relational permanency in foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. Albers, Bianca & Mildon, Robyn & Lyon, Aaron R. & Shlonsky, Aron, 2017. "Implementation frameworks in child, youth and family services – Results from a scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 101-116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawrence, Catherine & Claiborne, Nancy & Zeitlin, Wendy & Auerbach, Charles, 2016. "Finish what you start: A study of Design Team change initiatives' impact on agency climate," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 40-46.
    2. McCrae, Julie S. & Scannapieco, Maria & Leake, Robin & Potter, Cathryn C. & Menefee, David, 2014. "Who's on board? Child welfare worker reports of buy-in and readiness for organizational change," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 28-35.
    3. Pérez-García, María & Sempere-Pérez, Javier & Rodado-Martínez, Juan Vicente & Pina López, David & Llor-Esteban, Bartolomé & Jiménez-Barbero, José Antonio, 2020. "Effectiveness of multifamily therapy for adolescent disruptive behavior in a public institution: A randomized clinical trial," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    4. Harding, Leith & Murray, Kate & Shakespeare-Finch, Jane & Frey, Ron, 2020. "The wellbeing of foster and kin carers: A comparative study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Salveron, Mary & Bromfield, Leah & Kirika, Clara & Simmons, Jane & Murphy, Terry & Turnell, Andrew, 2015. "‘Changing the way we do child protection’: The implementation of Signs of Safety® within the Western Australia Department for Child Protection and Family Support," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 126-139.
    6. repec:plo:pone00:0205662 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Chuang, Emmeline & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & McBeath, Bowen & Jolles, Monica Pérez, 2023. "Organizational supports for evidence use in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Boel-Studt, Shamra & Huefner, Jonathan C. & Huang, Hui, 2019. "The group care quality standards assessment: A framework for assessment, quality improvement, and effectiveness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Garcia, Antonio R. & DeNard, Christina & Morones, Seth M. & Eldeeb, Nehal, 2019. "Mitigating barriers to implementing evidence-based interventions in child welfare: Lessons learned from scholars and agency directors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 313-331.
    10. Harding, Leith & Murray, Kate & Shakespeare-Finch, Jane & Frey, Ron, 2018. "High stress experienced in the foster and kin carer role: Understanding the complexities of the carer and child in context," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 316-326.
    11. Haune, Monica & Christiansen, Øivin & Heiervang, Einar R. & Haavind, Hanne, 2024. "“Great day! But now what?” Adolescents’ and foster carers’ experiences of a comprehensive health assessment for children in out-of-home care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Perry, Kristin J. & Price, Joseph M., 2018. "Concurrent child history and contextual predictors of children's internalizing and externalizing behavior problems in foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 125-136.
    13. Chad McDonald & Kristine A. Campbell & Cole Benson & Matthew J. Davis & Caren J. Frost, 2021. "Workforce Development and Multiagency Collaborations: A Presentation of Two Case Studies in Child Welfare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Isokuortti, Nanne & Aaltio, Elina, 2020. "Fidelity and influencing factors in the Systemic Practice Model of children's social care in Finland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Vasileva, Mira & Petermann, Franz, 2017. "Mental health needs and therapeutic service utilization of young children in foster care in Germany," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 69-76.
    16. Delawarde-Saïas, Cécile & Gagné, Marie-Hélène & Brunson, Liesette & Drapeau, Sylvie, 2018. "Implementing a multilevel prevention strategy under an intersectoral partnership: The case of the Triple P Program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 170-179.
    17. McCabe, Lisa A. & Ruberti, Mary R. & Endres, Thomas, 2022. "Sustaining program implementation: A co-constructed technical assistance process to support continuous high-quality implementation of the Therapeutic Crisis Intervention program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Elisa Mancinelli & Gaia Dell’Arciprete & Silvia Salcuni, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Foster Parents’ Psychological Adjustment and Parenting Style—An Evaluation of Foster Parents and Foster Children Variables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Harden, Brenda Jones & Duncan, Aimée Drouin & Morrison, Colleen I. & Panlilio, Carlomagno & Clyman, Robert B., 2015. "Compliance and Internalization in Preschool Foster Children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 103-110.
    20. Cooley, Morgan E. & Thompson, Heather M. & Wojciak, Armeda Stevenson, 2017. "Risk, resilience, and complexity: Experiences of foster parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 35-41.
    21. Blome, Wendy Whiting & Steib, Sue D., 2014. "The organizational structure of child welfare: Staff are working hard, but it is hardly working," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 181-188.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.