IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i18p10190-d634055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workforce Development and Multiagency Collaborations: A Presentation of Two Case Studies in Child Welfare

Author

Listed:
  • Chad McDonald

    (Social Research Institute, College of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

  • Kristine A. Campbell

    (Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

  • Cole Benson

    (Social Research Institute, College of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

  • Matthew J. Davis

    (Population Health Sciences, Health Systems Innovation and Research Division, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

  • Caren J. Frost

    (College of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

Abstract

Background: Two disciplines that work in the child welfare arena, social welfare and healthcare, are crucial for addressing families’ and children’s needs in social, emotional, and physical healthcare situations. How child welfare workers are trained and how healthcare teams collaborate with other stakeholders in the child welfare system is crucial in meeting and sustaining the needs of families and children. Methods: We demonstrate two case examples, one focusing on enhanced learning tools through virtual reality (VR) and the other on strengthening collaborations between healthcare teams and the child welfare system. Results: For the VR training tool, 79% of participants indicated they would recommend the VR learning tool as effective in developing skills in the child welfare workforce. In response to the learning collaborative project, child welfare participants reported positive impressions regarding collaborative practices while identifying system-level barriers to implementation. Conclusion: Findings from these two case studies provide insights from which to consider system development for designing and implementing sustainable improvements in child welfare approaches to families and children referred for suspected maltreatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Chad McDonald & Kristine A. Campbell & Cole Benson & Matthew J. Davis & Caren J. Frost, 2021. "Workforce Development and Multiagency Collaborations: A Presentation of Two Case Studies in Child Welfare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10190-:d:634055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10190/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10190/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbee, Anita P. & Christensen, Dana & Antle, Becky & Wandersman, Abraham & Cahn, Katharine, 2011. "Successful adoption and implementation of a comprehensive casework practice model in a public child welfare agency: Application of the Getting to Outcomes (GTO) model," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 622-633, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawrence, Catherine & Claiborne, Nancy & Zeitlin, Wendy & Auerbach, Charles, 2016. "Finish what you start: A study of Design Team change initiatives' impact on agency climate," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 40-46.
    2. Salveron, Mary & Bromfield, Leah & Kirika, Clara & Simmons, Jane & Murphy, Terry & Turnell, Andrew, 2015. "‘Changing the way we do child protection’: The implementation of Signs of Safety® within the Western Australia Department for Child Protection and Family Support," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 126-139.
    3. Isokuortti, Nanne & Aaltio, Elina, 2020. "Fidelity and influencing factors in the Systemic Practice Model of children's social care in Finland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Packard, Thomas, 2017. "Tactics for successful organizational change in a youth and family services agency," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 129-138.
    5. McCrae, Julie S. & Scannapieco, Maria & Leake, Robin & Potter, Cathryn C. & Menefee, David, 2014. "Who's on board? Child welfare worker reports of buy-in and readiness for organizational change," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 28-35.
    6. Blome, Wendy Whiting & Steib, Sue D., 2014. "The organizational structure of child welfare: Staff are working hard, but it is hardly working," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 181-188.
    7. McDonald, Chad & West, Kristen & Benson, Cole & Brittain, Charmaine, 2022. "A national review of child welfare competency models," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    8. Pipkin, Simon & Sterrett, Emma M. & Antle, Becky & Christensen, Dana N., 2013. "Washington State's adoption of a child welfare practice model: An illustration of the Getting To Outcomes implementation framework," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1923-1932.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10190-:d:634055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.