IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0300576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vector analysis of corneal astigmatism in cataractous eyes based on IOLMaster 700 biometry

Author

Listed:
  • Achim Langenbucher
  • Jascha Wendelstein
  • Alan Cayless
  • Peter Hoffmann
  • Nóra Szentmáry

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the corneal back surface by comparing the keratometric astigmatism (K, derived from the corneal front surface) of a modern optical biometer against astigmatism of Total Keratometry (TK, derived from both corneal surfaces) in a large population with cataractous eyes. The results were then used to define linear prediction models to map K to TK. Methods: From a large dataset containing bilateral biometric measurements (IOLMaster 700) in 9736 patients prior to cataract surgery, the total corneal astigmatism was decomposed into vectors for K, corneal back surface (BS), and TK. A multivariate prediction model (MV), simplified model with separation of vector components (SM) and a constant model (CM) were defined to map K to TK vector components. Results: The K centroid (X/Y) showed some astigmatism with-the-rule (0.1981/-0.0211 dioptre (dpt)) whereas the TK centroid was located around zero (-0.0071/-0.0381 dpt against-the-rule) and the BS centroid showed systematic astigmatism against-the-rule (-0.2367/-0.0145 dpt). The respective TK–K centroid was located at -0.2052/-0.0302 dpt. The MV model showed the same performance (i.e. mean absolute residuum) as the SM did (0.1098 and 0.1099 dpt respectively) while the CM performed only slightly worse (0.1121 dpt mean absolute residuum). Conclusion: In cases where tomographic data are unavailable statistical models could be used to consider the overall contribution of the back surface to the total corneal astigmatism. Since the performance of the CM is sufficiently close to that of MV and SM we recommend using the CM which can be directly considered e.g. as surgically induced astigmatism.

Suggested Citation

  • Achim Langenbucher & Jascha Wendelstein & Alan Cayless & Peter Hoffmann & Nóra Szentmáry, 2024. "Vector analysis of corneal astigmatism in cataractous eyes based on IOLMaster 700 biometry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0300576
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300576
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300576&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0300576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Achim Langenbucher & Nóra Szentmáry & Alan Cayless & Jascha Wendelstein & Peter Hoffmann, 2023. "Prediction of corneal power vectors after cataract surgery with toric lens implantation–A vector analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Henze, Norbert & Wagner, Thorsten, 1997. "A New Approach to the BHEP Tests for Multivariate Normality," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Achim Langenbucher & Nóra Szentmáry & Alan Cayless & Veronika Röggla & Christina Leydolt & Jascha Wendelstein & Peter Hoffmann, 2022. "Similarity of eyes in a cataractous population—How reliable is the biometry of the fellow eye for lens power calculation?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Baringhaus, Ludwig & Gaigall, Daniel, 2017. "Hotelling’s T2 tests in paired and independent survey samples: An efficiency comparison," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 177-198.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norbert Henze & María Dolores Jiménez-Gamero, 2019. "A new class of tests for multinormality with i.i.d. and garch data based on the empirical moment generating function," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(2), pages 499-521, June.
    2. M. D. Jiménez-Gamero, 2024. "Testing normality of a large number of populations," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 435-465, February.
    3. Achim Langenbucher & Nóra Szentmáry & Jascha Wendelstein & Alan Cayless & Peter Hoffmann & David Cooke, 2025. "Repeatability of biometric measures from the LenStar LS900 in a cataractous population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Philip Dörr & Bruno Ebner & Norbert Henze, 2021. "A new test of multivariate normality by a double estimation in a characterizing PDE," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 401-427, April.
    5. Nora Gürtler & Norbert Henze, 2000. "Goodness-of-Fit Tests for the Cauchy Distribution Based on the Empirical Characteristic Function," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 52(2), pages 267-286, June.
    6. Jiang, Qing & Hušková, Marie & Meintanis, Simos G. & Zhu, Lixing, 2019. "Asymptotics, finite-sample comparisons and applications for two-sample tests with functional data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 202-220.
    7. Ludwig Baringhaus & Daniel Gaigall, 2018. "Efficiency comparison of the Wilcoxon tests in paired and independent survey samples," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(8), pages 891-930, November.
    8. Norbert Henze & Celeste Mayer, 2020. "More good news on the HKM test for multivariate reflected symmetry about an unknown centre," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(3), pages 741-770, June.
    9. Wiktor Ejsmont & Bojana Milošević & Marko Obradović, 2023. "A test for normality and independence based on characteristic function," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 1861-1889, December.
    10. Tanya Araujo & João Dias & Samuel Eleutério & Francisco Louçã, 2012. "How Fama Went Wrong: Measures of Multivariate Kurtosis for the Identification of the Dynamics of a N-Dimensional Market," Working Papers Department of Economics 2012/21, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    11. A. Cabaña & E. M. Cabaña, 2003. "Tests of Normality Based on Transformed Empirical Processes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 309-335, September.
    12. Wanfang Chen & Marc G. Genton, 2023. "Are You All Normal? It Depends!," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(1), pages 114-139, April.
    13. Sudesh Pundir & R. Amala, 2015. "Detecting diagnostic accuracy of two biomarkers through a bivariate log-normal ROC curve," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(12), pages 2671-2685, December.
    14. Henze, N. & Klar, B. & Meintanis, S. G., 2003. "Invariant tests for symmetry about an unspecified point based on the empirical characteristic function," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 275-297, November.
    15. Tanya Ara'ujo & Jo~ao Dias & Samuel Eleut'erio & Francisco Louc{c}~a, 2012. "How Fama Went Wrong: Measures of Multivariate Kurtosis for the Identification of the Dynamics of a N-Dimensional Market," Papers 1207.1202, arXiv.org.
    16. Meintanis, Simos G. & Ngatchou-Wandji, Joseph & Taufer, Emanuele, 2015. "Goodness-of-fit tests for multivariate stable distributions based on the empirical characteristic function," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 171-192.
    17. Leucht, Anne & Neumann, Michael H., 2009. "Consistency of general bootstrap methods for degenerate U-type and V-type statistics," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(8), pages 1622-1633, September.
    18. Gutjahr, Steffen & Henze, Norbert & Folkers, Martin, 1999. "Shortcomings of Generalized Affine Invariant Skewness Measures," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Bruno Ebner & Norbert Henze, 2020. "Tests for multivariate normality—a critical review with emphasis on weighted $$L^2$$ L 2 -statistics," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(4), pages 845-892, December.
    20. Christian Goldmann & Bernhard Klar & Simos Meintanis, 2015. "Data transformations and goodness-of-fit tests for type-II right censored samples," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 59-83, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0300576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.