IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0269709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Similarity of eyes in a cataractous population—How reliable is the biometry of the fellow eye for lens power calculation?

Author

Listed:
  • Achim Langenbucher
  • Nóra Szentmáry
  • Alan Cayless
  • Veronika Röggla
  • Christina Leydolt
  • Jascha Wendelstein
  • Peter Hoffmann

Abstract

Background: In some situations it is necessary to use biometry from the fellow eye for lens power calculation prior to cataract surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyse the lateral differences in biometric measurements and their impact on the lens power calculation. Methods: The analysis was based on a large dataset of 19,472 measurements of 9736 patients prior to cataract surgery with complete biometric data of both left and right eyes extracted from the IOLMaster 700. After randomly indexing the left or right eye as primary (P) and secondary (S), the differences between S and P eye were recorded and analysed (Keratometry (RSEQ), total keratometry (TRSEQ) and back surface power (BRSEQ)), axial length AL, corneal thickness CCT, anterior chamber depth ACD, lens thickness LT). Lens power was calculated with the Castrop formula for all P and S eyes, and the refraction was predicted using both the P and S eye biometry for the lens power calculation. Results: Lateral differences (S-P, 90% confidence interval) ranged between -0.64 to 0.63 dpt / -0.67 to 0.66 dpt / -0.12 to 0.12 dpt for RSEQ / TRSEQ / BRSEQ. The respective difference in AL / CCT / ACD / LT ranged between -0.46 to 0.43 mm / -0.01 to 0.01 mm / -0.20 to 0.20 mm / -0.13 to 0.14 mm. The resulting difference in lens power and predicted refraction ranged between -2.02 to 2.00 dpt and -1.36 to 1.30 dpt where the biometry of the S eye is used instead of the P eye. The AL and RSEQ were identified as the most critical parameters where the biometry of the fellow eye is used. Conclusion: Despite a strong similarity of both eyes, intraocular lens power calculation with fellow eye biometry could yield different results for the lens power and finally for the predicted refraction. In 10% of cases, the lens power derived from the S eye deviates by 2 dpt or more, resulting in a refraction deviation of 1.36 dpt or more.

Suggested Citation

  • Achim Langenbucher & Nóra Szentmáry & Alan Cayless & Veronika Röggla & Christina Leydolt & Jascha Wendelstein & Peter Hoffmann, 2022. "Similarity of eyes in a cataractous population—How reliable is the biometry of the fellow eye for lens power calculation?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269709
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269709
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0269709&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0269709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Achim Langenbucher & Nóra Szentmáry & Alan Cayless & Jascha Wendelstein & Peter Hoffmann, 2023. "Prediction of corneal power vectors after cataract surgery with toric lens implantation–A vector analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Achim Langenbucher & Jascha Wendelstein & Alan Cayless & Peter Hoffmann & Nóra Szentmáry, 2024. "Vector analysis of corneal astigmatism in cataractous eyes based on IOLMaster 700 biometry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0269709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.