IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0288316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of corneal power vectors after cataract surgery with toric lens implantation–A vector analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Achim Langenbucher
  • Nóra Szentmáry
  • Alan Cayless
  • Jascha Wendelstein
  • Peter Hoffmann

Abstract

Background: Intraocular lenses are typically calculated based on a pseudophakic eye model, and for toric lenses (tIOL) a good estimate of corneal astigmatism after cataract surgery is required in addition to the equivalent corneal power. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between the preoperative IOLMaster (IOLM) and the preoperative and postoperative Casia2 (CASIA) tomographic measurements of corneal power in a cataractous population with tIOL implantation, and to predict total power (TP) from the IOLM and CASIA keratometric measurements. Methods: The analysis was based on a dataset of 88 eyes of 88 patients from 1 clinical centre before and after tIOL implantation. All IOLM and CASIA keratometric and total corneal power measurements were converted to power vector components, and the differences between preoperative IOLM or CASIA and postoperative CASIA measurements were assessed. Feedforward neural network and multivariate linear regression prediction algorithms were implemented to predict the postoperative total corneal power (as a reference for tIOL calculation) from the preoperative IOLM and CASIA keratometric measurements. Results: On average, the preoperative IOLM keratometric / total corneal power under- / overestimates the postoperative CASIA keratometric / real corneal power by 0.12 dpt / 0.21 dpt. The prediction of postoperative CASIA real power from preoperative IOLM or CASIA keratometry shows that postoperative total corneal power is systematically (0.18 dpt / 0.27 dpt) shifted towards astigmatism against the rule, which is not reflected by keratometry. The correlation of postoperative CASIA real power to the corresponding preoperative CASIA values is better than those as compared to the preoperative IOLM keratometry. However, there is a large variation from preoperative IOLM or CASIA keratometry to the postoperative CASIA real power of up to 1.1 dpt (95% confidence interval). Conclusion: One of the challenges of tIOL calculation is the prediction of postoperative total corneal power from preoperative keratometry. Keratometric power restricted to a front surface measurement does not fully reflect the situation of corneal back surface astigmatism, which typically adds some extra against the rule astigmatism.

Suggested Citation

  • Achim Langenbucher & Nóra Szentmáry & Alan Cayless & Jascha Wendelstein & Peter Hoffmann, 2023. "Prediction of corneal power vectors after cataract surgery with toric lens implantation–A vector analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288316
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288316
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288316&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0288316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Achim Langenbucher & Nóra Szentmáry & Alan Cayless & Veronika Röggla & Christina Leydolt & Jascha Wendelstein & Peter Hoffmann, 2022. "Similarity of eyes in a cataractous population—How reliable is the biometry of the fellow eye for lens power calculation?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Achim Langenbucher & Jascha Wendelstein & Alan Cayless & Peter Hoffmann & Nóra Szentmáry, 2024. "Vector analysis of corneal astigmatism in cataractous eyes based on IOLMaster 700 biometry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Achim Langenbucher & Jascha Wendelstein & Alan Cayless & Peter Hoffmann & Nóra Szentmáry, 2024. "Vector analysis of corneal astigmatism in cataractous eyes based on IOLMaster 700 biometry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.