IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Repeatability of biometric measures from the LenStar LS900 in a cataractous population

Author

Listed:
  • Achim Langenbucher
  • Nóra Szentmáry
  • Jascha Wendelstein
  • Alan Cayless
  • Peter Hoffmann
  • David Cooke

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the repeatability of biometric measures and assess interactions between their uncertainties for use in an error propagation model, using patient data. Methods: Cross-sectional non-randomised study evaluating a dataset containing 969 LenStar 900 biometric measurements taken before cataract surgery. Only complete scans with at least 3 successful measurements for each eye performed on the same day were considered. For each sequence, the aggregated mean (AMEAN) and population standard deviations (ASD) were derived. The within-subject standard deviation Sw was extracted for: corneal thickness, CCT, anterior chamber depth ACD, lens thickness LT, axial length AL, corneal diameter WTW, and the keratometric power vector components equivalent power KEQ, and the projections of corneal astigmatism KC0 and KC45. Correlations between the uncertainties were assessed using Spearman rank correlations. Results: For the 266 eyes matching the inclusion criteria, Sw was 3.6/ 24.7/35.5/ 17.7/ 107.5 µm for CCT/ ACD/ LT/ AL WTW and 0.18/ 0.12/ 0.10 dioptres for KEQ/ KC0/ KC45. The keratometric axis ASD is inversely proportional to the keratometric astigmatism AMEAN. LT and ACD uncertainties are strongly negatively correlated, with KEQ and KC0 uncertainties moderately correlated. Conclusions: The uncertainty and correlation data presented here could be used to define a Monte-Carlo based error propagation model mapping the biometric measures and uncertainties to variations in predicted refraction after cataract surgery. We recommend using power vector components for error propagation models since the large decay over keratometric astigmatism makes keratometric axis uncertainty unreliable.

Suggested Citation

  • Achim Langenbucher & Nóra Szentmáry & Jascha Wendelstein & Alan Cayless & Peter Hoffmann & David Cooke, 2025. "Repeatability of biometric measures from the LenStar LS900 in a cataractous population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321786
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321786
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321786&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321786?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.