IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0288539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vaccine related crowdfunding on a ‘Freedom Fundraising’ platform

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Snyder
  • Marco Zenone

Abstract

Introduction: Donation-based crowdfunding was heavily used during the COVID-19 pandemic. While most of these campaigns were uncontroversial, others spread misinformation or undermined public health. In response, mainstream crowdfunding platforms like GoFundMe restricted what campaigns they would host. This led some campaigns to shift to lesser-known and less restrictive crowdfunding platforms. While research on health-related misinformation on mainstream crowdfunding platforms is increasing, less is known about crowdfunding on less restrictive platforms like GiveSendGo. The aim of this study is to review vaccine-related crowdfunding campaigns on the GiveSendGo platform to better understand: 1) how vaccines are portrayed on GiveSendGo; and 2) how successful these campaigns have been at attracting financial support. Methods: We searched the GiveSendGo crowdfunding platform for campaigns including “vaccine” or “vaccination”. This process yielded 907 unique results which were then scraped for their campaign text and fundraising data. The authors reviewed these campaigns for fundraisers whose aims related to vaccines for humans and assigned campaigns as being for 1) Accessing vaccines; 2) creating Spaces for the unvaccinated; 3) helping Unvaccinated Individuals); 4) Advocacy about vaccines; 5) supporting Anti-Mandate actions; and 6) responding to Vaccine Injuries. Findings: We identified 765 crowdfunding campaigns that raised $6,814,817 and requested $838,578,249. Anti-Mandate campaigns were most common, followed by Unvaccinated Individuals, Vaccine Injuries, Advocacy, Access, and Spaces. Only Access campaigns took a positive or neutral view toward vaccines. Themes of freedom and religion cut across campaign types with campaigns critical of vaccines invoking bodily autonomy and religious freedom as justifying their fundraisers. Discussion: Very few of these fundraisers met their goals. With the exception of Access campaigns, they frequently contained highly polarizing language advocating against public health mandates, misinformation about vaccine safety, and language from bioethics and reproductive choice advocates. Restrictions on vaccine-related campaigns on the GoFundMe platform likely drove campaign creation on GiveSendGo.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Snyder & Marco Zenone, 2023. "Vaccine related crowdfunding on a ‘Freedom Fundraising’ platform," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288539
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288539
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288539&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0288539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Igra, Mark & Kenworthy, Nora & Luchsinger, Cadence & Jung, Jin-Kyu, 2021. "Crowdfunding as a response to COVID-19: Increasing inequities at a time of crisis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borello, Giuliana & Muri, Roberta, 2024. "The effect of covid policy restrictions on donations during the sustainable and entrepreneurial context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Katherine Coronel-Pangol & Jessica Paule-Vianez & Carmen Orden-Cruz, 2024. "Conventional or alternative financing to promote entrepreneurship? An analysis of female and male entrepreneurship in developed and developing countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 163-187, March.
    3. Teng Ye & Jingnan Zheng & Junhui Jin & Jingyi Qiu & Wei Ai & Qiaozhu Mei, 2024. "Using Artificial Intelligence to Unlock Crowdfunding Success for Small Businesses," Papers 2407.09480, arXiv.org.
    4. Ahmad Harith Ashrofie Hanafi & Mohd Shahid Azim Mohd Saufi & Muhammad Zarunnaim Haji Wahab & Suheil Che Sobry & Mohd Hilal Muhammad, 2024. "Crowdfunding as a Social Phenomenon: A Bibliometric Exploration of Research Trends and Societal Implications," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(9), pages 909-927, September.
    5. Moysidou, Krystallia & Cohen Chen, Smadar, 2023. "Inducing collective action intentions for healthcare reform through medical crowdfunding framing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    6. Lenny Phulong Mamaro & Athenia Bongani Sibindi, 2022. "Financial Sustainability of African Small-to-Medium Enterprises during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Determinants of Crowdfunding Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Janina Sundermeier & Tyge-F. Kummer, 2022. "Does personality still matter in e-commerce? How perceived hubris influences the assessment of founders’ trustworthiness using the example of reward-based crowdfunding," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1127-1144, September.
    8. Lenny Phulong Mamaro & Athenia Bongani Sibindi, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Financing in Africa during the COVID-19 Pandemic," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Davis, Aaron Renee & Elbers, Shauna K. & Kenworthy, Nora, 2023. "Racial and gender disparities among highly successful medical crowdfunding campaigns," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    10. Evangelos Katsamakas & J. Manuel Sanchez-Cartas, 2024. "A computational model of the effects of borrower default on the stability of P2P lending platforms," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(3), pages 597-618, September.
    11. Nikolaos Daskalakis, 2023. "COVID-19 Effects on Reward-based Crowdfunding Campaigns," Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 1-6.
    12. Elrashidy, Zeinab & Haniffa, Roszaini & Sherif, Mohamed & Baroudi, Sarra, 2024. "Determinants of reward crowdfunding success: Evidence from Covid-19 pandemic," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.