IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0288236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction and application of an applicability evaluation system for garlic planters based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Haichao Song
  • Xiang Dai

Abstract

The widespread use of garlic planters has been hampered by the lack of comprehensive applicability evaluation criteria, as their functional and structural designs are sometimes subpar and their purchase and use are not always financially advantageous. In order to close this gap in the applicability evaluation system for garlic planters, a three-level index system based on Technical indicators, Economic indicators, and Working condition indicators was proposed in the current study. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was then applied to achieve the evaluation with the help of an analytical hierarchy process and validity test. By providing basic descriptions, physical test results and specific calculation results to the consulted ten experts and collecting the scores for the 3rd level indicators, the first-generation garlic planter was analyzed for the practical application of the Pizhou-white garlic planting area based on the established applicability evaluation system. The evaluated score of 74.47 was towards the bottom of the "good" range. The findings also suggest that enhancing operational safety, implementing plant spacing and planting depth adjustments, enhancing ease of operation, and to some extent lowering capital cost will improve functional performance and economic performance. The upgraded machine was subsequently created using the optimization guidelines. Its applicability score was 77.52, representing a 4.1% gain over the original computer. It has reached the midpoint of the "good" range and has achieved the optimization goal. The proposed applicability evaluation system can generally draw unbiased conclusions and provide scientific evaluation methods for the promotion of garlic planters in specific areas, benefiting not only the design and improvement of garlic planters but also the purchasing and application of them. However, further indicator refinement and a more thorough evaluation method appear necessary before the evaluation system is made more widely available.

Suggested Citation

  • Haichao Song & Xiang Dai, 2023. "Construction and application of an applicability evaluation system for garlic planters based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288236
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288236
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288236&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0288236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huiping Guo & Yazhou Cao & Wenyuan Song & Jiao Zhang & Changlin Wang & Chensi Wang & Fuzeng Yang & Lin Zhu, 2021. "Design and Simulation of a Garlic Seed Metering Mechanism," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Jun Li & Hong Zhang & Yinshan Han & Baodong Wang, 2016. "Study on Failure of Third-Party Damage for Urban Gas Pipeline Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dongu Im & Ho-Seop Lee & Jae-Hyun Kim & Dong-Joo Moon & Tae-Ick Moon & Seung-Hwa Yu & Young-Jun Park, 2023. "Bucket Size Optimization for Metering Device in Garlic Planter Using Discrete Element Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Ruiz-Tagle, Andres & Lewis, Austin D. & Schell, Colin A. & Lever, Ernest & Groth, Katrina M., 2022. "BaNTERA: A Bayesian Network for Third-Party Excavation Risk Assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Yan Liu & Guopeng Mi & Shilin Zhang & Peng Li & Yuxiang Huang, 2022. "Determination of Discrete Element Modelling Parameters of Adzuki Bean Seeds," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Huang, Wencheng & Zhang, Rui & Xu, Minhao & Yu, Yaocheng & Xu, Yifei & De Dieu, Gatesi Jean, 2020. "Risk state changes analysis of railway dangerous goods transportation system: Based on the cusp catastrophe model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Wang Yang & Jinfei Zhao & Xinying Liu & Linqiao Xi & Jiean Liao, 2022. "Simulation and Test of “Separated Burying Device” of Green Manure Returning Machine Based on the EDEM Software," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Bo Lu & Xiangdong Ni & Shufeng Li & Kezhi Li & Qingzheng Qi, 2022. "Simulation and Experimental Study of a Split High-Speed Precision Seeding System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Huang, Wencheng & Zhang, Yue & Yu, Yaocheng & Xu, Yifei & Xu, Minhao & Zhang, Rui & De Dieu, Gatesi Jean & Yin, Dezhi & Liu, Zhanru, 2021. "Historical data-driven risk assessment of railway dangerous goods transportation system: Comparisons between Entropy Weight Method and Scatter Degree Method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    8. Wencheng Huang & Yueyang Li & Xingyi Kou & Wenzhe Wang & Yifei Xu, 2021. "Using a FMEA–TIFIAD Approach to Identify the Risk of Railway Dangerous Goods Transportation System," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 63-95, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0288236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.