IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0287495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing operational readiness: Regulatory landscape and compliance in zimbabwe for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Chiku
  • Talkmore Maruta
  • Fredrick Mbiba
  • Justen Manasa

Abstract

The regulation of medical devices and In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) medical devices have lagged significantly, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Disparities in regulating medical and IVD medical devices in Africa are below the global average. This may translate to poor access to quality-assured medical and IVD devices, resulting in undesirable health outcomes. Operational readiness to regulate medical and IVD devices at the Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe (MCAZ) was assessed. The aim was to determine the strengths and gaps and propose an action plan that can be monitored and evaluated to assess progress over time. We used the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Benchmarking Tool for medical devices and IVDs methodology to evaluate regulatory oversight of these products. Purposive sampling was used for data collection using researcher-administered global benchmarking tool factsheets and document reviews to evaluate the implementation of the regulatory functions. The regulatory functions assessed were the National Regulatory System, Registration and Market Authorization, Vigilance, Market Surveillance and Control, Licensing Establishment, Regulatory Inspection, Laboratory Testing, and Clinical Trials Oversight. The MCAZ attained maturity level 1, with a regulatory system score of 79%, registration and market authorization 44%, vigilance 27%, market surveillance and control 40%, licensing establishment 62%, regulatory inspection 68%, laboratory testing 88%, and clinical trials 18%. Condoms and gloves were the only regulated medical devices in Zimbabwe. IVDs were not regulated by the MCAZ. This review showed that the regulatory system is not robust, fit for purpose, responsive, transparent, or proportionate to the risk classification of medical devices and IVDs. It is crucial to amend the Medicines and Allied Substance Control Act to incorporate the definition and classification of medical devices and IVDs, regulatory authority establishment, licensing and registration, quality management system, conformity assessment, post-market surveillance, labeling and instructions for use, capacity building and training, and international harmonization.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Chiku & Talkmore Maruta & Fredrick Mbiba & Justen Manasa, 2024. "Assessing operational readiness: Regulatory landscape and compliance in zimbabwe for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0287495
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287495
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287495&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0287495?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrews, Matt & Pritchett, Lant & Woolcock, Michael, 2013. "Escaping Capability Traps Through Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 234-244.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Brick Murtazashvili, 2024. "The experimented society: interventions, social science, and the failure of post-conflict reconstruction in Afghanistan," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2024-43, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Joanna Buckley & Neil McCulloch & Nick Travis, 2017. "Donor-supported approaches to improving extractives governance: Lessons from Nigeria and Ghana," WIDER Working Paper Series 033, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Catherine Long, 2017. "Delegated Service Authority: Institutional Evolution of PEPFAR Health-Based Program Implementing Units in Tanzania," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(3), pages 303-312, September.
    4. Jean-Benoit Falisse & Hugues Nkengurutse & Léonard Ntakarutimana, 2023. "Strengthening the community governance of healthcare services in ‘fragile’ settings: Evidence from Burundi and South Kivu, DR Congo," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Matt Andrews, 2018. "Overcoming the limits of institutional reform in Uganda," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 159-182, March.
    6. Jeremy Streatfeild, 2017. "Does This Road Go on Forever? Modelling Sustainability of Infrastructure in Developing Countries," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 9(2), pages 69-81, December.
    7. Lant Pritchett & Salimah Samji & Jeffrey S. Hammer, 2012. "It's All about MeE: Using Structured Experiential Learning ('e') to Crawl the Design Space," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-104, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Matt Andrews, 2014. "Can One Retell a Mozambican Reform Story Through Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2014-094, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Matt Andrews, 2013. "Who Really Leads Development?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-092, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Matt Andrews, 2014. "An Ends-Means Approach to Looking at Governance," CID Working Papers 281, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    11. Andrews, Matt, 2014. "An Ends-Means Approach to Looking at Governance," Working Paper Series rwp14-022, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    12. Pritish Behuria & Tom Goodfellow, 2016. "The political settlement and ‘deals environment’ in Rwanda: Unpacking two decades of economic growth," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-057-16, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    13. Doug Porter & Michael Watts, 2017. "Righting the Resource Curse: Institutional Politics and State Capabilities in Edo State, Nigeria," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 249-263, February.
    14. Hassan, Mai & Kodouda, Ahmed, 2023. "Dismantling old or forging new clientelistic ties? Sudan’s civil service reform after uprising," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    15. Andrews, Matt, 2015. "Has Sweden Injected Realism into Public Financial Management Reforms in Partner Countries?," Working Paper Series 15-063, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    16. Evangelia Balla & Ana Mafalda Madureira & Jaap Zevenbergen, 2025. "Land Reforms Revisited: An Emerging Perspective on the Hellenic Land Administration Reform as a Wicked Policy Problem," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Nadel, Sara & Pritchett, Lant, 2016. "Searching for the Devil in the Details: Learning about Development Program Design," Working Paper Series rwp16-041, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    18. Matt Andrews & Tim McNaught & Salimah Samji, 2018. "Opening Adaptation Windows onto Public Financial Management Reform Gaps in Mozambique," CID Working Papers 341, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    19. McMichael, Celia & Robinson, Priscilla, 2016. "Drivers of sustained hygiene behaviour change: A case study from mid-western Nepal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 28-36.
    20. Andrews, Matt, 2013. "How Do Governments Become Great? Ten Cases, Two Competing Explanations, One Large Research Agenda," WIDER Working Paper Series 091, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0287495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.