IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0282009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the suicidal mind: The ‘open source’ Suicidality Scale, for adolescents and adults

Author

Listed:
  • Keith M Harris
  • Lu Wang
  • Guanglun M Mu
  • Yanxia Lu
  • Cheryl So
  • Wei Zhang
  • Jing Ma
  • Kefei Liu
  • Wei Wang
  • Melvyn Wei-bin Zhang
  • Roger C Ho

Abstract

Clinicians are expected to provide accurate and useful mental health assessments, sometimes in emergency settings. The most urgent challenge may be in calculating suicide risk. Unfortunately, existing instruments often fail to meet requirements. To address this situation, we used a sustainable scale development approach to create a publicly available Suicidality Scale (SS). Following a critical review of current measures, community input, and panel discussions, an international item pool survey included 5,115 English-speaking participants aged 13–82 years. Revisions were tested with two follow-up cross-sectional surveys (Ns = 814 and 626). Pool items and SS versions were critically examined through item response theory, hierarchical cluster, factor and bifactor analyses, resulting in a unidimensional eight-item scale. Psychometric properties were high (loadings > .77; discrimination > 2.2; test-retest r = .87; internal consistency, ω = .96). Invariance checks were satisfied for age, gender, ethnicity, rural/urban residence, first language, self-reported psychiatric diagnosis and suicide attempt history. The SS showed stronger psychometric properties, and significant differences in bivariate associations with depressive symptoms, compared with included suicide measures. The ‘open source’ Suicidality Scale represents a significant step forward in accurate assessment for people aged 13+, and diverse populations. This study provides an example of sustainable scale development utilizing community input, emphasis on strong psychometric evidence from diverse samples, and a free-to-use license allowing instrument revisions. These methods can be used to develop a wide variety of psychosocial instruments that can benefit clinicians, researchers, and the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith M Harris & Lu Wang & Guanglun M Mu & Yanxia Lu & Cheryl So & Wei Zhang & Jing Ma & Kefei Liu & Wei Wang & Melvyn Wei-bin Zhang & Roger C Ho, 2023. "Measuring the suicidal mind: The ‘open source’ Suicidality Scale, for adolescents and adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-28, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282009
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282009&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0282009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klaas Sijtsma & Julius M. Pfadt, 2021. "Part II: On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha: Discussing Lower Bounds and Correlated Errors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 843-860, December.
    2. Stefan Stieger & Ulf‐Dietrich Reips & Martin Voracek, 2007. "Forced‐response in online surveys: Bias from reactance and an increase in sex‐specific dropout," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(11), pages 1653-1660, September.
    3. Denny Borsboom, 2006. "The attack of the psychometricians," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 425-440, September.
    4. Richard Zinbarg & William Revelle & Iftah Yovel & Wen Li, 2005. "Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ω H : their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 123-133, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven Andrew Culpepper & Herman Aguinis & Justin L. Kern & Roger Millsap, 2019. "High-Stakes Testing Case Study: A Latent Variable Approach for Assessing Measurement and Prediction Invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 285-309, March.
    2. Anne-Catherine Guio & David Gordon & Eric Marlier & Hector Najera & Marco Pomati, 2018. "Towards an EU measure of child deprivation," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(3), pages 835-860, June.
    3. Gaetano Martino & Giulia Giacchè & Enrica Rossetti, 2016. "Organizing the Co-Production of Health and Environmental Values in Food Production: The Constitutional Processes in the Relationships between Italian Solidarity Purchasing Groups and Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, March.
    4. repec:plo:pone00:0012412 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Omar N. Solinger & Woody van Olffen & Robert A. Roe & Joeri Hofmans, 2013. "On Becoming (Un)Committed: A Taxonomy and Test of Newcomer Onboarding Scenarios," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 1640-1661, December.
    6. Ali B. Mahmoud & Dieu Hack-Polay & Nicholas Grigoriou & Iris Mohr & Leonora Fuxman, 2021. "A generational investigation and sentiment and emotion analyses of female fashion brand users on Instagram in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(5), pages 526-544, September.
    7. Denny Borsboom, 2022. "Possible Futures for Network Psychometrics," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 253-265, March.
    8. Klaas Sijtsma & Jules L. Ellis & Denny Borsboom, 2024. "Recognize the Value of the Sum Score, Psychometrics’ Greatest Accomplishment," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 84-117, March.
    9. Hector Najera & Delfino Vargas & Fernando Cortés, 2025. "The scope of consensual deprivation indices for Mexico: reliability, criterion validity and invariance analyses," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 711-737, February.
    10. Anthony Clairmont & Andrew Maul, 2019. "A Review of “Sociocognitive Foundations of Educational Measurement” by Robert Mislevy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1097-1100, December.
    11. Abigail A Marsh & Monica Magalhaes & Matthew Peeler & Sophie M Rose & Thomas C Darton & Nir Eyal & Josh Morrison & Seema K Shah & Virginia Schmit, 2022. "Characterizing altruistic motivation in potential volunteers for SARS-CoV-2 challenge trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Gabriel Olaru & Jeremy Burrus & Carolyn MacCann & Franklin M Zaromb & Oliver Wilhelm & Richard D Roberts, 2019. "Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Lisa D. Wijsen & Denny Borsboom, 2021. "Perspectives on Psychometrics Interviews with 20 Past Psychometric Society Presidents," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 327-343, March.
    14. Brittney K. Anderson & John P. Meyer & Chelsea Vaters & Jose A. Espinoza, 2020. "Measuring Personal Growth and Development in Context: Evidence of Validity in Educational and Work Settings," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 2141-2167, August.
    15. Clemens M Lechner & Daniel Danner & Beatrice Rammstedt, 2019. "Grit (effortful persistence) can be measured with a short scale, shows little variation across socio-demographic subgroups, and is associated with career success and career engagement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-29, November.
    16. Piotr Koc, 2021. "Measuring Non-electoral Political Participation: Bi-factor Model as a Tool to Extract Dimensions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 271-287, July.
    17. Martin Biehler & Heinz Holling & Philipp Doebler, 2015. "Saddlepoint Approximations of the Distribution of the Person Parameter in the Two Parameter Logistic Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 665-688, September.
    18. Jules L. Ellis & Klaas Sijtsma, 2024. "Proof of Reliability Convergence to 1 at Rate of Spearman–Brown Formula for Random Test Forms and Irrespective of Item Pool Dimensionality," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(3), pages 774-795, September.
    19. Escribano, Rosario & Treviño, Ernesto & Nussbaum, Miguel & Torres Irribarra, David & Carrasco, Diego, 2020. "How much does the quality of teaching vary at under-performing schools? Evidence from classroom observations in Chile," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Bhaskar Mukherjee & Siniša Subotić & Ajay Kumar Chaubey, 2018. "And now for something completely different: the congruence of the Altmetric Attention Score’s structure between different article groups," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 253-275, January.
    21. Lisa D. Wijsen & Denny Borsboom & Tiago Cabaço & Willem J. Heiser, 2019. "An Academic Genealogy of Psychometric Society Presidents," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 562-588, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.