IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0282009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the suicidal mind: The ‘open source’ Suicidality Scale, for adolescents and adults

Author

Listed:
  • Keith M Harris
  • Lu Wang
  • Guanglun M Mu
  • Yanxia Lu
  • Cheryl So
  • Wei Zhang
  • Jing Ma
  • Kefei Liu
  • Wei Wang
  • Melvyn Wei-bin Zhang
  • Roger C Ho

Abstract

Clinicians are expected to provide accurate and useful mental health assessments, sometimes in emergency settings. The most urgent challenge may be in calculating suicide risk. Unfortunately, existing instruments often fail to meet requirements. To address this situation, we used a sustainable scale development approach to create a publicly available Suicidality Scale (SS). Following a critical review of current measures, community input, and panel discussions, an international item pool survey included 5,115 English-speaking participants aged 13–82 years. Revisions were tested with two follow-up cross-sectional surveys (Ns = 814 and 626). Pool items and SS versions were critically examined through item response theory, hierarchical cluster, factor and bifactor analyses, resulting in a unidimensional eight-item scale. Psychometric properties were high (loadings > .77; discrimination > 2.2; test-retest r = .87; internal consistency, ω = .96). Invariance checks were satisfied for age, gender, ethnicity, rural/urban residence, first language, self-reported psychiatric diagnosis and suicide attempt history. The SS showed stronger psychometric properties, and significant differences in bivariate associations with depressive symptoms, compared with included suicide measures. The ‘open source’ Suicidality Scale represents a significant step forward in accurate assessment for people aged 13+, and diverse populations. This study provides an example of sustainable scale development utilizing community input, emphasis on strong psychometric evidence from diverse samples, and a free-to-use license allowing instrument revisions. These methods can be used to develop a wide variety of psychosocial instruments that can benefit clinicians, researchers, and the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith M Harris & Lu Wang & Guanglun M Mu & Yanxia Lu & Cheryl So & Wei Zhang & Jing Ma & Kefei Liu & Wei Wang & Melvyn Wei-bin Zhang & Roger C Ho, 2023. "Measuring the suicidal mind: The ‘open source’ Suicidality Scale, for adolescents and adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-28, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282009
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282009&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0282009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klaas Sijtsma & Julius M. Pfadt, 2021. "Part II: On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha: Discussing Lower Bounds and Correlated Errors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 843-860, December.
    2. Denny Borsboom, 2006. "The attack of the psychometricians," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 425-440, September.
    3. Stefan Stieger & Ulf‐Dietrich Reips & Martin Voracek, 2007. "Forced‐response in online surveys: Bias from reactance and an increase in sex‐specific dropout," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(11), pages 1653-1660, September.
    4. Richard Zinbarg & William Revelle & Iftah Yovel & Wen Li, 2005. "Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ω H : their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 123-133, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0012412 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Denny Borsboom, 2022. "Possible Futures for Network Psychometrics," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 253-265, March.
    3. Klaas Sijtsma & Jules L. Ellis & Denny Borsboom, 2024. "Recognize the Value of the Sum Score, Psychometrics’ Greatest Accomplishment," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 84-117, March.
    4. Gabriel Olaru & Jeremy Burrus & Carolyn MacCann & Franklin M Zaromb & Oliver Wilhelm & Richard D Roberts, 2019. "Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Martin Biehler & Heinz Holling & Philipp Doebler, 2015. "Saddlepoint Approximations of the Distribution of the Person Parameter in the Two Parameter Logistic Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 665-688, September.
    6. Daniel Schulze & Kathrin Heinitz & Timo Lorenz, 2018. "Comparative organizational research starts with sound measurement: Validity and invariance of Turker’s corporate social responsibility scale in five cross-cultural samples," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Karin Alexandra van Nes & L Andries van der Ark & Cor van Loveren & Irene Helena Adriana Aartman, 2023. "Construction of a questionnaire based on the Health Action Process Approach for psycho-social cognitive determinants of parents in brushing children’s teeth in the Netherlands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Carlo Cavicchia & Maurizio Vichi, 2021. "Statistical Model-Based Composite Indicators for Tracking Coherent Policy Conclusions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 449-479, August.
    9. Klaas Sijtsma, 2006. "Psychometrics in Psychological Research: Role Model or Partner in Science?," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 451-455, September.
    10. Jacobs, Sander & Wolfstein, Kirsten & Vandenbruwaene, Wouter & Vrebos, Dirk & Beauchard, Olivier & Maris, Tom & Meire, Patrick, 2015. "Detecting ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: A practice-oriented application in four industrialized estuaries," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 378-389.
    11. Peter M. Bentler, 2021. "Alpha, FACTT, and Beyond," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 861-868, December.
    12. Klaas Sijtsma & Julius M. Pfadt, 2021. "Rejoinder: The Future of Reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 887-892, December.
    13. Barbosa, Anrafel de Souza & Crispim, Maria Cristina & da Silva, Luiz Bueno & da Silva, Jonhatan Magno Norte & Barbosa, Aglaucibelly Maciel & Correia, Lucas Miguel Alencar de Morais & Morioka, Sandra N, 2025. "Empirical analysis of workers' perceptions of ESG impacts on corporate sustainability performance: A methodological innovation combining the PLS-SEM, PROMETHEE-ROC and FIMIX-PLS methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    14. Chatpong Tangmanee & Phattharaphong Niruttinanon, 2019. "Web Survey’s Completion Rates: Effects of Forced Responses, Question Display Styles, and Subjects’ Attitude," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(1), pages 20-29, January.
    15. Michał Jakubczyk & Dominik Golicki, 2020. "Elicitation and modelling of imprecise utility of health states," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 51-71, February.
    16. Fabian Gander & Jennifer Hofmann & Willibald Ruch, 2021. "From Unemployment to Employment and Back: Professional Trajectories and Well-Being," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(2), pages 739-751, April.
    17. José Luis Carrasco-Sáez & Marcelo Careaga Butter & María Graciela Badilla-Quintana & Juan Molina-Farfán, 2021. "Analysis of Psychometric Properties and Validation of the Personal Learning Environments Questionnaire (B-PLE) in Higher Education Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Klaas Sijtsma, 2016. "Playing with Data—Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(1), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Julius Wambua & Elegwa Mukulu & Esther Waiganjo, 2017. "Cost as a Factor of Outsourcing Third-Party Logistics Providers and the Performance of Food and Beverages Manufacturing Companies in Kenya," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 343-356, February.
    20. Rigtering, Coen & Niemand, Thomas & Phan, Vinh & Gawke, Jason, 2024. "Intrapreneurs, high performers, or hybrid stars? How individual entrepreneurial orientation affects employee performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    21. César Viloria-Núñez & Marcela Tovar & Anthony Constant Millán, 2023. "Digital archetypes: a tool for understanding personality characteristics in the digital culture," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.