IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0274875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency evaluation of green innovation of China’s heavy pollution industries based on SBM-Lasso-Tobit model

Author

Listed:
  • Chun Fu
  • Yanfang Li
  • Jing Zhang
  • Weiqi Min

Abstract

Green innovation has become the goal for promoting the transformation and upgrading heavy pollution industries in the context of high-quality development, and the key factor for the success of green innovation is increasing the green innovation efficiency of heavy pollution industries. To understand the current situation of China’s industrial innovation and get out of the dilemma, we use non-expected Slacks-based model (SBM) to measure green innovation efficiency in Chinese industry, Lasso regression to screen the influencing factors of heavy pollution industries, tobit regression to study the influence degree and direction of different influencing factors on green innovation efficiency of heavy pollution industry. The results show that: (1) The green innovation efficiency of the 16 heavily polluting industries studied in this paper is generally low; (2) Coordination, green and openness all have a positive impact on the green innovation efficiency of the industry. (3) A certain degree of government scientific research support is conducive to improving the efficiency of industrial green innovation and exceeding the limit will have a restraining effect on enterprise innovation. According to the results, we put forward the corresponding policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun Fu & Yanfang Li & Jing Zhang & Weiqi Min, 2022. "Efficiency evaluation of green innovation of China’s heavy pollution industries based on SBM-Lasso-Tobit model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0274875
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0274875
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0274875&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0274875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jun-liang Du & Yong Liu & Wei-xue Diao, 2019. "Assessing Regional Differences in Green Innovation Efficiency of Industrial Enterprises in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baihui Jin & Wei Li, 2025. "Spatial Effects and Driving Factors of Consumption Upgrades on Municipal Solid Waste Eco-Efficiency, Considering Emission Outputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Xiu Liu & Zhuo He & Zixin Deng & Sandeep Poddar, 2024. "Analysis of Spatiotemporal Disparities and Spatial Spillover Effect of a Low-Carbon Economy in Chinese Provinces Under Green Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Yaliu Yang & Yuan Wang & Cui Wang & Yingyan Zhang & Cuixia Zhang, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Evolution of the Science and Technology Innovative Efficiency of Regional Industrial Enterprises: A Data-Driven Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Alexandre Rodrigues da Silva & Claudia Brito Silva Cirani & Fernando Antonio Ribeiro Serra & Angélica Pigola & Priscila Rezende da Costa & Isabel Cristina Scafuto & Roberto Lima Ruas & Marcos Rogério , 2023. "Determining Factors on Green Innovation Adoption: An Empirical Study in Brazilian Agribusiness Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Quan Guo & Min Zhou & Nana Liu & Yaoyu Wang, 2019. "Spatial Effects of Environmental Regulation and Green Credits on Green Technology Innovation under Low-Carbon Economy Background Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Liwen Sun & Ying Han, 2022. "Spatial Correlation Network Structure and Influencing Factors of Two-Stage Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    7. He, Haonan & Li, Shiqiang & Wang, Shanyong & Zhang, Chaojia & Ma, Fei, 2023. "Value of dual-credit policy: Evidence from green technology innovation efficiency," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 182-198.
    8. Zeng, Jing & Ling, Wen & Hua, Min & Chan, Kam C., 2024. "Impact of an increase in tax deductibility of R&D expenditure on firms' ESG: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    9. Xiaonan Fan & Sainan Ren & Yang Liu, 2023. "The Driving Factors of Green Technology Innovation Efficiency—A Study Based on the Dynamic QCA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Bing Cao & Zishu Han & Ling Liang & Yuanyuan Liu & Jialiang Wang & Jiaping Xie, 2022. "Independent Innovation or Secondary Innovation: The Moderating of Network Embedded Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Ying Fu & Zhaohan Wang & Yun Wang, 2024. "Green Financial Policy for Fostering Green Technological Innovation: The Role of Financing Constraints, Science Expenditure, and Heightened Industrial Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-26, October.
    12. Shuwen Zhang & Chenhui Ding & Chao Liu, 2024. "The Impact of Carbon Trading Policy on the Green Innovation Efficiency of Enterprises: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Jinghuai She & Qi Zhang, 2024. "Green innovation and enterprise digital transformation: Escape from the “dilemma” of development and governance choices," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-25, May.
    14. Tuochen Li & Xinyu Zhou, 2022. "Research on the Mechanism of Government–Industry–University–Institute Collaborative Innovation in Green Technology Based on Game–Based Cellular Automata," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Robert Walasek & Nina Stepnicka & Adam Lulek, 2021. "Technological Innovation and Risk in the Management of Integrated Supply Chains – A Survey Results," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4 - Part ), pages 479-492.
    16. Zhou, Yuwen & Tian, Lixin & Yang, Xiaoguang, 2023. "Schumpeterian endogenous growth model under green innovation and its enculturation effect," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    17. Hongge Zhu & Zhenhuan Chen & Shaopeng Zhang & Wencheng Zhao, 2022. "The Role of Government Innovation Support in the Process of Urban Green Sustainable Development: A Spatial Difference-in-Difference Analysis Based on China’s Innovative City Pilot Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Hao Zhang & Xin Sun & Kailong Dong & Lianghui Sui & Min Wang & Qiong Hong, 2022. "Green Innovation in Regional Logistics: Level Evaluation and Spatial Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Xiaohong Chen & Ruochen Xu, 2024. "Assessment of Green Innovation Efficiency in Chinese Industrial Enterprises Based on an Improved Relational Two-Stage DEA Approach: Regional Disparities and Convergence Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-29, August.
    20. Jie Wang & Pingping Xiong & Shanshan Wang & Ziheng Yuan & Jiawei Shangguan, 2025. "Evaluating and Predicting Green Technology Innovation Efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: Based on the Joint SBM Model and GM(1,N|λ,γ) Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-28, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0274875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.