IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0271122.html

The role of patients in the governance of a sustainable healthcare system: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Aggarwal
  • Sukhraj Gill
  • Adeel Siddiquei
  • Kristina Kokorelias
  • Giulio DiDiodato

Abstract

Patients, healthcare providers and insurers need a governance framework to establish the ‘rules of use’ to deliver more responsible use of services. The objective of this review was to provide an overview of frameworks and analyze the definitions of patient accountability to identify themes and potential gaps in the literature. Fifteen bibliographic databases were searched until July 2021. This included: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Web of Science, HealthSTAR, Scopus, ABI/INFORM Global, Cochrane Library, ERIC, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Sociological Abstracts, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts and International Political Science Abstracts. Searches were also completed in Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria included articles focused on accountability of patients, and exclusions included articles that were not available, not written in English, with missing information, and commentaries or editorials. In total, 85530 unique abstracts were identified, and 27 articles were included based on the inclusion criteria. The results showed that patient accountability is rarely used and poorly defined. Most studies focused on what patients should be held to account for and agreed that patients should be responsible for behaviours that may contribute to adverse health outcomes. Some studies promoted a punitive approach as a mechanism of enforcement. Most studies argued for positive incentives or written agreements and contracts. While many studies recognized the value of patient accountability frameworks, there was a concern that these frameworks could further exacerbate existing socioeconomic disparities and contribute to poor health-related behaviours and outcomes (e.g., stigmatizing marginalized groups). Shared models of accountability between patients and healthcare providers or patients and communities were preferred. Before committing to a patient accountability framework for improving patient health and sustaining a healthcare system, the concept must be acceptable and reasonable to patients, providers, and society as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Aggarwal & Sukhraj Gill & Adeel Siddiquei & Kristina Kokorelias & Giulio DiDiodato, 2022. "The role of patients in the governance of a sustainable healthcare system: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0271122
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0271122
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0271122&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0271122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bevan, Gwyn & Evans, Alice & Nuti, Sabina, 2019. "Reputations count: why benchmarking performance is improving health care across the world," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 141-161, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver, Adam, 2020. "Reviving and revising economic liberalism: an examination in relation to private decisions and public policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103060, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Haaland, Marte E.S. & Haukanes, Haldis & Zulu, Joseph Mumba & Moland, Karen Marie & Blystad, Astrid, 2020. "Silent politics and unknown numbers: Rural health bureaucrats and Zambian abortion policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    3. De Rosis, Sabina & Guidotti, Elisa & Zuccarino, Sara & Venturi, Giulia & Ferré, Francesca, 2020. "Waiting time information in the Italian NHS: A citizen perspective," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(8), pages 796-804.
    4. McGuire, Finn & Santos, Rita & Smith, Peter C. & Stacey, Nicholas & Edoka, Ijeoma & Kreif, Noemi, 2025. "Health facility quality peer effects: Are financial incentives necessary?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Horenberg, Frank & Lungu, Daniel Adrian & Nuti, Sabina, 2020. "Measuring research in the big data era: The evolution of performance measurement systems in the Italian teaching hospitals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(12), pages 1387-1394.
    6. Nuti, Sabina & Ferré, Francesca & Seghieri, Chiara & Foresi, Elisa & Stukel, Therese A., 2020. "Managing the performance of general practitioners and specialists referral networks: A system for evaluating the heart failure pathway," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 44-51.
    7. Alice Borghini & Ilaria Corazza & Sabina Nuti, 2021. "Learning from Excellence to Improve Healthcare Services: The Experience of the Maternal and Child Care Pathway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-10, February.
    8. Amerigo Ferrari & Chiara Seghieri & Andrea Giannini & Paolo Mannella & Tommaso Simoncini & Milena Vainieri, 2023. "Driving time drives the hospital choice: choice models for pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Italy," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(9), pages 1575-1586, December.
    9. Daniel Adrian Lungu & Elisa Foresi & Paolo Belardi & Sabina Nuti & Andrea Giannini & Tommaso Simoncini, 2021. "The Impact of New Surgical Techniques on Geographical Unwarranted Variation: The Case of Benign Hysterectomy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, June.
    10. Rosanna Le Voir, 2023. "Leaving no One Behind: Displaced Persons and Sustainable Development Goal Indicators on Sexual and Reproductive Health," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(5), pages 1-24, October.
    11. Anell, Anders, 2019. "Performance management and audit & feedback to support learning and innovation – Theoretical review and implications for Swedish primary care," Papers in Innovation Studies 2019/11, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0271122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.