IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0270869.html

Psychometric properties of the item-reduced version of the comprehensive general parenting questionnaire for caregivers of preschoolers in a Finnish context

Author

Listed:
  • Carola Ray
  • Ester van der Borgh-Sleddens
  • Rejane Augusta de Oliveira Figueiredo
  • Jessica Gubbels
  • Mona Bjelland
  • Eva Roos

Abstract

Introduction: Many instruments for assessing general parenting have been reported as burdensome and are thus seldom used in studies exploring children’s energy balance-related behaviors or weight. This study evaluates the factorial structure of the item-reduced version of the Comprehensive General Parenting Questionnaire (CGPQ), which assesses five constructs of general parenting. Methods: The study uses data from two cross-sectional studies: Study 1 in 2014 (n = 173) and Study 2 in 2015–16 (n = 805). Parents of children aged three to six answered the CGPQ; in Study 1 the 69-item version, and in Study 2 the 29-item version. The reduction was based on the results of the confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) in Study 1. In both datasets, internal consistency, as Cronbach’s alphas and intraclass correlations between the items of each construct, was tested. A combined assessment of the CFA and items response theory evaluated the construct validity and the item importance for the 29-item version, and a further the reduced 22-item version. Results: In Study 1, the highest Cronbach’s alphas were shown for the five constructs in the 69-item version. A higher intraclass correlation was found between the constructs in the 69- and 29-item versions, than between the 69- and the 22-item version. However, a high concordance was found between the constructs in the 29- and 22-item versions in both Study 1 and in Study 2 (0.76–1.00). Testing the goodness-of-fit of the CFA models revealed that the 22-item model fulfilled all the criteria, showing that it had a better factorial structure than the 29-item model. Standard estimations ranged from 0.20 to 0.76 in the 22-item version. Conclusion: The reduced 22- and 29-item versions of the 69-item CGPQ showed good model fit, the 22-item version the better of the two. These short versions can be used to assess general parenting without overburdening the respondents.

Suggested Citation

  • Carola Ray & Ester van der Borgh-Sleddens & Rejane Augusta de Oliveira Figueiredo & Jessica Gubbels & Mona Bjelland & Eva Roos, 2022. "Psychometric properties of the item-reduced version of the comprehensive general parenting questionnaire for caregivers of preschoolers in a Finnish context," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0270869
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0270869
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0270869&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0270869?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    2. Chalmers, R. Philip, 2012. "mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoben, Matthias & Kilmen, Sevilay & Keefe, Janice & O'Rourke, Hannah M. & Banerjee, Sube & Estabrooks, Carole A., 2025. "Measurement invariance and differential item functioning of a care staff proxy measure of nursing home resident dementia-specific quality of life (DEMQOL-CH): do care aides' first language, and care aides' and residents’ ethno-cultural background mat," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    2. Renan P. Monteiro & Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho & Paul H. P. Hanel & Emerson Diógenes Medeiros & Phillip Dyamond Gomes Silva, 2022. "The Efficient Assessment of Self-Esteem: Proposing the Brief Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 931-947, April.
    3. Daniel L. Oberski, 2016. "A Review of Latent Variable Modeling With R," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(2), pages 226-233, April.
    4. Jenna Hicks & Jessica Dewey & Yaniv Brandvain & Anita Schuchardt, 2020. "Development of the Biological Variation In Experimental Design And Analysis (BioVEDA) assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Piotr Koc, 2021. "Measuring Non-electoral Political Participation: Bi-factor Model as a Tool to Extract Dimensions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 271-287, July.
    6. Alex Bató & Valentin Brodszky & Ariel Zoltán Mitev & Balázs Jenei & Fanni Rencz, 2024. "Psychometric properties and general population reference values for PROMIS Global Health in Hungary," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(4), pages 549-562, June.
    7. Sanny D Afable & Grace T Cruz & Yasuhiko Saito, 2023. "Sex differences in the psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiological Studies–Depression (CES-D) Scale in older Filipinos," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Teague R. Henry & Lindley R. Slipetz & Ami Falk & Jiaxing Qiu & Meng Chen, 2024. "Ordinal Outcome State-Space Models for Intensive Longitudinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1203-1229, December.
    9. Shenghai Dai & Dubravka Svetina & Xiaolin Wang, 2017. "Reporting Subscores Using R: A Software Review," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 42(5), pages 617-638, October.
    10. Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa & Laura Limiñana-Bravo, 2019. "An Instrument to Measure Mental Health Professionals’ Beliefs and Attitudes towards Service Users’ Rights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Michal Ďuriník & Jakub Procházka & Hynek Cígler, 2018. "The Short Maximization Inventory," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(1), pages 123-136, January.
    12. Ting Wang & Carolin Strobl & Achim Zeileis & Edgar C. Merkle, 2018. "Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 132-155, March.
    13. Laura Maldonado-Murciano & Halley M. Pontes & Mark D. Griffiths & Maite Barrios & Juana Gómez-Benito & Georgina Guilera, 2020. "The Spanish Version of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form (IGDS9-SF): Further Examination Using Item Response Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Benjamin D. Schalet & Sangdon Lim & David Cella & Seung W. Choi, 2021. "Linking Scores with Patient-Reported Health Outcome Instruments:A VALIDATION STUDY AND COMPARISON OF THREE LINKING METHODS," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 717-746, September.
    15. Thiago Medeiros Cavalcanti & Gabriel Lins Holanda Coelho & Alessandro Teixeira Rezende & Katia Correa Vione & Valdiney Veloso Gouveia, 2019. "Decisional and Emotional Forgiveness Scales: Psychometric Validity and Correlates with Personality and Vengeance," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(5), pages 1247-1264, November.
    16. Minjeong Jeon & Paul Boeck & Jevan Luo & Xiangrui Li & Zhong-Lin Lu, 2021. "Modeling Within-Item Dependencies in Parallel Data on Test Responses and Brain Activation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 239-271, March.
    17. Wickelmaier, Florian & Strobl, Carolin & Zeileis, Achim, 2012. "Psychoco: Psychometric Computing in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i01).
    18. Myszkowski, Nils & Storme, Martin, 2018. "A snapshot of g? Binary and polytomous item-response theory investigations of the last series of the Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM-LS)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 109-116.
    19. Marius Leckelt & Eunike Wetzel & Tanja M. Gerlach & Robert A. Ackerman & Joshua D. Miller & William J. Chopik & Lars Penke & Katharina Geukes & Albrecht C. P. Küfner & Roos Hutteman & David Richter & , 2016. "Validation of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire Short Scale (NARQ-S) in Convenience and Representative Samples," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 884, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    20. Gregory Gorman & Alison Bacon & Jon May & Stephen Minton, 2025. "Hikikomori Risk in the UK," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 71(8), pages 1621-1632, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0270869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.