IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0263070.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A robust biostatistical method leverages informative but uncertainly determined qPCR data for biomarker detection, early diagnosis, and treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Zhuang
  • Luísa Camacho
  • Camila S Silva
  • Michael Thomson
  • Kevin Snyder

Abstract

As a common medium-throughput technique, qPCR (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction) is widely used to measure levels of nucleic acids. In addition to accurate and complete data, experimenters have unavoidably observed some incomplete and uncertainly determined qPCR data because of intrinsically low overall amounts of biological materials, such as nucleic acids present in biofluids. When there are samples with uncertainly determined qPCR data, some investigators apply the statistical complete-case method by excluding the subset of samples with uncertainly determined data from analysis (CO), while others simply choose not to analyze (CNA) these datasets altogether. To include as many observations as possible in analysis for interesting differential changes between groups, some investigators set incomplete observations equal to the maximum quality qPCR cycle (MC), such as 32 and 40. Although straightforward, these methods may decrease the sample size, skew the data distribution, and compromise statistical power and research reproducibility across replicate qPCR studies. To overcome the shortcomings of the existing, commonly-used qPCR data analysis methods and to join the efforts in advancing statistical analysis in rigorous preclinical research, we propose a robust nonparametric statistical cycle-to-threshold method (CTOT) to analyze incomplete qPCR data for two-group comparisons. CTOT incorporates important characteristics of qPCR data and time-to-event statistical methodology, resulting in a novel analytical method for qPCR data that is built around good quality data from all subjects, certainly determined or not. Considering the benchmark full data (BFD), we compared the abilities of CTOT, CO, MC, and CNA statistical methods to detect interesting differential changes between groups with informative but uncertainly determined qPCR data. Our simulations and applications show that CTOT improves the power of detecting and confirming differential changes in many situations over the three commonly used methods without excess type I errors. The robust nonparametric statistical method of CTOT helps leverage qPCR technology and increase the power to detect differential changes that may assist decision making with respect to biomarker detection and early diagnosis, with the goal of improving the management of patient healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Zhuang & Luísa Camacho & Camila S Silva & Michael Thomson & Kevin Snyder, 2022. "A robust biostatistical method leverages informative but uncertainly determined qPCR data for biomarker detection, early diagnosis, and treatment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-29, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0263070
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0263070
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0263070&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0263070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tracey L Weissgerber & Vesna D Garovic & Jelena S Milin-Lazovic & Stacey J Winham & Zoran Obradovic & Jerome P Trzeciakowski & Natasa M Milic, 2016. "Reinventing Biostatistics Education for Basic Scientists," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tracey L Weissgerber, 2021. "Learning from the past to develop data analysis curricula for the future," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-3, July.
    2. Heidi Spratt & Erin E. Fox & Nawar Shara & Madhu Mazumdar, 2017. "Strategies for Success: Early-Stage Collaborating Biostatistics Faculty in an Academic Health Center," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 220-230, July.
    3. Margarita Rubio & María Sánchez-Ronco & Rosa Mohedano & Asunción Hernando, 2018. "The impact of participatory teaching methods on medical students’ perception of their abilities and knowledge of epidemiology and statistics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0263070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.