IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0261914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling of the factor structure of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE)

Author

Listed:
  • Rapson Gomez
  • Taylor Brown
  • Shaun Watson
  • Vasileios Stavropoulos

Abstract

The Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE) is a multiple dimensional measure of cognitive empathy [comprising primary factors for perspective taking (PT), online simulation (OS)], and affective empathy [comprising primary factors for emotion contagion (EC), proximal responsivity (PRO), and peripheral responsivity (PER)]. This study used independent clusters confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) to examine the scale’s factor structure. A general community sample of 203 (men = 43, women = 160) between 17 and 63 years completed the QCAE. Although both the five-factor oblique and second order factor models showed good model fit, and clarity in the pattern of factor loadings, in the second-order factor model, none of the primary factors loaded significantly on their respective secondary factors, thereby favoring the five-factor oblique model. The factors in this model were supported in terms of external validity. Despite this, the factor for PRO in this model showed low reliability for meaning interpretation. A revised four-factor oblique model without the PRO factor showed good fit, clarity in the pattern of factor loadings, and reliability and validity for the factors in this model, thereby suggesting this to be the best model to represent ratings on the QCAE.

Suggested Citation

  • Rapson Gomez & Taylor Brown & Shaun Watson & Vasileios Stavropoulos, 2022. "Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling of the factor structure of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0261914
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0261914
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0261914&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0261914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreia Queirós & Eugénia Fernandes & Renate Reniers & Adriana Sampaio & Joana Coutinho & Ana Seara-Cardoso, 2018. "Psychometric properties of the questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy in a Portuguese sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    2. K. Jöreskog, 1969. "A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(2), pages 183-202, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amber Mosewich & Valerie Hadd & Peter Crocker & Bruno Zumbo, 2013. "Invariance Testing of the SF-36 Health Survey in Women Breast Cancer Survivors: Do Personal and Cancer-related Variables Influence the Meaning of Quality of Life Items?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 559-577, January.
    2. Mamiko Takeuchi & Hisakazu Matsushige, 2008. "Effects of Intra-corporate Policies on the Work of Female Employees," OSIPP Discussion Paper 08E009, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
    3. Friedrich Gebhardt, 1971. "Maximum likelihood solution to factor analysis when some factors are completely specified," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 36(2), pages 155-163, June.
    4. Ke-Hai Yuan & Wai Chan, 2005. "On Nonequivalence of Several Procedures of Structural Equation Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 791-798, December.
    5. Ke-Hai Yuan & Ying Cheng & Wei Zhang, 2010. "Determinants of Standard Errors of MLEs in Confirmatory Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 633-648, December.
    6. John E. Hunter & Gerald M. Gillmore, 1974. "A Memory Search Model of Reliability," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 2(3), pages 281-311, February.
    7. Ryu, Do-Hyeon & Kim, Kwang-Jae, 2024. "The influence of information privacy concerns and perceived electricity usage habits on the usage intention of advanced metering infrastructure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    8. Phil Ender, 2012. "EFA Within a CFA Context," SAN12 Stata Conference 3, Stata Users Group.
    9. Ronald S. Burt & Michael G. Fischer & Kenneth P. Christman, 1979. "Structures of Well-Being," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 8(1), pages 111-120, August.
    10. Haruhiko Ogasawara, 2000. "Some relationships between factors and components," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 167-185, June.
    11. Ana Sampaio, 2012. "Wine Tourism and Visitors' Perceptions: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach," Tourism Economics, , vol. 18(3), pages 533-553, June.
    12. P. Bentler, 1986. "Structural modeling and psychometrika: An historical perspective on growth and achievements," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 35-51, March.
    13. Ronald S. Burt & James A. Wiley & Michael J. Minor & James R. Murray, 1978. "Structure of Well-Being," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 6(3), pages 365-407, February.
    14. Wagenvoort, Rien J.L.M. & Ebner, André & Morgese Borys, Magdalena, 2011. "A factor analysis approach to measuring European loan and bond market integration," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1011-1025, April.
    15. Lulaj Enkeleda, 2025. "Discerning Financial and Investment Epiphanies: Challenges, Inhibitions, and Global Perspectives - What Secrets Does Research Reveal?," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 35(3), pages 1-38.
    16. Rapson Gomez & Vasileios Stavropoulos & Mark D Griffiths, 2020. "Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modelling of the factor structure of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales-21," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Massilva Dekkal & Manon Arcand & Sandrine Prom Tep & Lova Rajaobelina & Line Ricard, 2024. "Factors affecting user trust and intention in adopting chatbots: the moderating role of technology anxiety in insurtech," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 699-728, September.
    18. Cavicchia, Carlo & Sarnacchiaro, Pasquale & Vichi, Maurizio, 2021. "A composite indicator for the waste management in the EU via Hierarchical Disjoint Non-Negative Factor Analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    19. Bruce Korth & Ledyard Tucker, 1975. "The distribution of chance congruence coefficients from simulated data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 40(3), pages 361-372, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0261914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.