IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0259762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical validation of the psychological concept of a perceived feeling of ‘energy’: Advancement into the study of positive psychology

Author

Listed:
  • Huy P Phan
  • Bing H Ngu
  • Si-Chi Chen
  • Ruey-Yih Lin
  • Hui-Wen Wang
  • Jen-Hwa Shih
  • Sheng-Ying Shi

Abstract

The paradigm of positive psychology, significant in nature, helps to explain the proactivity and motivation of human agency, such as a secondary school student’s state of autonomy, confidence, and personal resolve to strive for optimal learning and/or non-learning experiences. Our recent research development, in tandem with other scholars’ inquiries, has focused on one aspect of positive psychology–namely, a person’s achievement of ‘optimal best’, which reflects the maximization of his/her state of functioning (e.g., cognitive functioning). Capitalizing on our previous research, we develop a psychological concept that we term as a ‘perceived feeling of energy’. A perceived feeling of energy (e.g., a perceived feeling of liveliness) is proposed to act as a ‘motivational engine’, or as a central driver, which then could predict and enhance a person’s achievement of optimal best. Six hundred and twenty-seven university students (N = 438 women, 189 men) responded to a suite of self-report questionnaires. Structural equation modelling (SEM) techniques were used to test a conceptual model, where we focused on the antecedent (i.e., the direct impact of self-efficacy on a perceived feeling of energy) and consequence of a perceived feeling energy (i.e., the impact of a perceived feeling of energy on personal resolve, and the sustaining of optimal best). Analysis of results showed support for our original hypothesized model–for example: self-efficacy as an antecedent of energy and the central role of the energy as a predictor and potential mediator of future outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Huy P Phan & Bing H Ngu & Si-Chi Chen & Ruey-Yih Lin & Hui-Wen Wang & Jen-Hwa Shih & Sheng-Ying Shi, 2021. "Empirical validation of the psychological concept of a perceived feeling of ‘energy’: Advancement into the study of positive psychology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-29, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0259762
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0259762
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0259762&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0259762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0259762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.