IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0214466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The human geography of Twitter: Quantifying regional identity and inter-region communication in England and Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Rudy Arthur
  • Hywel T P Williams

Abstract

Given the centrality of regions in social movements, politics and public administration, here we aim to quantitatively study regional identity, cross-region communication and sentiment. This paper presents a new methodology to study social interaction within and between social-geographic regions, and then applies the methodology to a case study of England and Wales. We use a social network, built from geo-located Twitter data, to identify contiguous geographical regions with a shared social identity and then investigate patterns of communication within and between them. In contrast to other approaches (e.g. using phone call data records or online friendship networks), use of Twitter data provides message contents as well as social connections. This allows us to investigate not only the volume of communication between locations, but also the sentiment and vocabulary used in the messages. For example, our case study shows: a significant dialect difference between England and Wales; that regions tend to be more positive about themselves than about others, with the South being more ‘self-regarding’ than the North; and that people talk politics much more between regions than within. This study demonstrates how social media can be used to quantify regional identity and inter-region communications and sentiment, exposing these previously hard-to-observe geographic concepts to analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Rudy Arthur & Hywel T P Williams, 2019. "The human geography of Twitter: Quantifying regional identity and inter-region communication in England and Wales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0214466
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214466
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214466&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0214466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlo Ratti & Stanislav Sobolevsky & Francesco Calabrese & Clio Andris & Jonathan Reades & Mauro Martino & Rob Claxton & Steven H Strogatz, 2010. "Redrawing the Map of Great Britain from a Network of Human Interactions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-6, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreu Casero-Ripollés & Josep-Lluís Micó-Sanz & Míriam Díez-Bosch, 2020. "Digital Public Sphere and Geography: The Influence of Physical Location on Twitter’s Political Conversation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 96-106.
    2. Andreu Casero-Ripollés & Josep-Lluís Micó-Sanz & Míriam Díez-Bosch, 2020. "Digital Public Sphere and Geography: The Influence of Physical Location on Twitter’s Political Conversation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 96-106.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michele Coscia & Ricardo Hausmann, 2015. "Evidence That Calls-Based and Mobility Networks Are Isomorphic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Yao Shen & Michael Batty, 2019. "Delineating the perceived functional regions of London from commuting flows," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 547-550, May.
    3. Siiri Silm & Veronika Mooses & Anniki Puura & Anu Masso & Ago Tominga & Erki Saluveer, 2021. "The Relationship between Ethno-Linguistic Composition of Social Networks and Activity Space: A Study Using Mobile Phone Data," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 192-207.
    4. Garrett Dash Nelson, 2021. "Communities, Complexity, and the ‘Conchoration’: Network Analysis and the Ontology of Geographic Units," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(4), pages 351-369, September.
    5. Quanyi Zheng & Xiaolong Zhao & Mengxiao Jin, 2019. "Research on Urban Public Green Space Planning Based on Taxi Data: A Case Study on Three Districts of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Ding, Liang & Huang, Ziqian & Xiao, Chaowei, 2023. "Are human activities consistent with planning? A big data evaluation of master plan implementation in Changchun," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Madeleine I. G. Daepp, 2022. "Small-area moving ratios and the spatial connectivity of neighborhoods: Insights from consumer credit data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(3), pages 1129-1146, March.
    8. Michele Coscia & Frank Neffke & Eduardo Lora, 2015. "Report on the Poblacion Flotante of Bogota," CID Working Papers 67, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    9. Garrett Dash Nelson & Alasdair Rae, 2016. "An Economic Geography of the United States: From Commutes to Megaregions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Gang Pan & Wangsheng Zhang & Zhaohui Wu & Shijian Li, 2014. "Online Community Detection for Large Complex Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-12, July.
    11. Karima Kourtit, 2021. "City intelligence for enhancing urban performance value: a conceptual study on data decomposition in smart cities," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 191-222, February.
    12. Jingjing Yan & Zhengdong Huang & Tianhong Zhao & Ying Zhang & Fei Chang, 2023. "Transit Travel Community Detection and Evolutionary Analysis: A Case Study of Shenzhen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Sanja Šćepanović & Igor Mishkovski & Pan Hui & Jukka K Nurminen & Antti Ylä-Jääski, 2015. "Mobile Phone Call Data as a Regional Socio-Economic Proxy Indicator," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Beckers, Joris & Vanhoof, Maarten & Verhetsel, Ann, 2019. "Returning the particular: Understanding hierarchies in the Belgian logistics system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 315-324.
    15. Lingjing Wang & Cheng Qian & Philipp Kats & Constantine Kontokosta & Stanislav Sobolevsky, 2017. "Structure of 311 service requests as a signature of urban location," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Didem Gündoğdu & Pietro Panzarasa & Nuria Oliver & Bruno Lepri, 2019. "The bridging and bonding structures of place-centric networks: Evidence from a developing country," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Shuaiming Chen & Ximing Ji & Haipeng Shao, 2024. "Revealing the Community Structure of Urban Bus Networks: a Multi-view Graph Learning Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 589-619, September.
    18. Xiping Yang & Zhiyuan Zhao & Shiwei Lu, 2016. "Exploring Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Urban Human Mobility Hotspots," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Emanuele Strano & Matheus Viana & Luciano da Fontoura Costa & Alessio Cardillo & Sergio Porta & Vito Latora, 2013. "Urban Street Networks, a Comparative Analysis of Ten European Cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(6), pages 1071-1086, December.
    20. Bilong Shen & Weimin Zheng & Kathleen M. Carley, 2018. "Urban Activity Mining Framework for Ride Sharing Systems Based on Vehicular Social Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 705-734, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0214466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.