IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0211038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PopRank: Ranking pages’ impact and users’ engagement on Facebook

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Zaccaria
  • Michela Del Vicario
  • Walter Quattrociocchi
  • Antonio Scala
  • Luciano Pietronero

Abstract

The advent of social networks revolutionized the way people access to information sources. Understanding the complex relationship between these sources and users is crucial. We introduce an algorithm, that we call PopRank, to assess both the Impact of Facebook pages as well as users’ Engagement on the basis of their mutual interactions. The ideas behind the PopRank are that i) high impact pages attract many users with a low engagement, which means that they receive comments from users that rarely comment, and ii) high engagement users interact with high impact pages, that is they mostly comment pages with a high popularity. The resulting ranking of pages can predict the number of comments a page will receive and the number of its future posts. Pages’ impact turns out to be slightly dependent on the quality of pages’ informative content (e.g., science vs conspiracy) but independent of users’ polarization.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Zaccaria & Michela Del Vicario & Walter Quattrociocchi & Antonio Scala & Luciano Pietronero, 2019. "PopRank: Ranking pages’ impact and users’ engagement on Facebook," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0211038
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0211038
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0211038&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0211038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orazio Angelini & Matthieu Cristelli & Andrea Zaccaria & Luciano Pietronero, 2017. "The complex dynamics of products and its asymptotic properties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Orazio Angelini & Matthieu Cristelli & Andrea Zaccaria & Luciano Pietronero, 2016. "The complex dynamics of products and its asymptotic properties," Papers 1610.00274, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    3. Emanuele Pugliese & Guido L Chiarotti & Andrea Zaccaria & Luciano Pietronero, 2017. "Complex Economies Have a Lateral Escape from the Poverty Trap," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Cesar A. Hidalgo & Ricardo Hausmann, 2009. "The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity," Papers 0909.3890, arXiv.org.
    5. C. A. Hidalgo & B. Klinger & A. -L. Barabasi & R. Hausmann, 2007. "The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations," Papers 0708.2090, arXiv.org.
    6. Juan Carlos Chávez & Marco T. Mosqueda & Manuel Gómez-Zaldívar, 2017. "Economic Complexity and Regional Growth Performance: Evidence from the Mexican Economy," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 47(2), pages 201-219, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orazio Angelini & Tiziana Di Matteo, 2018. "Complexity of products: the effect of data regularisation," Papers 1808.08249, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2018.
    2. Freire, Clovis, 2019. "Economic diversification: A model of structural economic dynamics and endogenous technological change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 13-28.
    3. Mika J. Straka & Guido Caldarelli & Tiziano Squartini & Fabio Saracco, 2017. "From Ecology to Finance (and Back?): Recent Advancements in the Analysis of Bipartite Networks," Papers 1710.10143, arXiv.org.
    4. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Hidalgo, César A., 2023. "The policy implications of economic complexity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
    6. Pinheiro, Cristina, 2025. "Relatedness and economic complexity as tools for industrial policy: Insights and limitations," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Hao Liao & Alexandre Vidmer, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis of the Predictive Abilities of Economic Complexity Metrics Using International Trade Network," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-12, February.
    8. Emanuele Pugliese & Lorenzo Napolitano & Andrea Zaccaria & Luciano Pietronero, 2019. "Coherent diversification in corporate technological portfolios," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Koch, Philipp & Schwarzbauer, Wolfgang, 2021. "Yet another space: Why the Industry Space adds value to the understanding of structural change and economic development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 198-213.
    10. Napolitano, Lorenzo & Sbardella, Angelica & Consoli, Davide & Barbieri, Nicolò & Perruchas, François, 2022. "Green innovation and income inequality: A complex system analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 224-240.
    11. Ben-Hur Francisco Cardoso & Eva Yamila da Silva Catela & Guilherme Viegas & Fl'avio L. Pinheiro & Dominik Hartmann, 2023. "Export complexity, industrial complexity and regional economic growth in Brazil," Papers 2312.07469, arXiv.org.
    12. Frank Neffke & Angelica Sbardella & Ulrich Schetter & Andrea Tacchella, 2024. "Economic Complexity Analysis," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2430, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2024.
    13. Fernando Gómez Zaldívar & Edmundo Molina & Miguel Flores & Manuel de Jesús Gómez Zaldívar, 2019. "Complejidad económica de las zonas económicas especiales en México: Oportunidades de diversificación y sofisticación industrial. (Economic Complexity of the Special Economic Zones in Mexico: Opportuni," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(1), pages 1-40, May.
    14. Lapatinas, Athanasios & Litina, Anastasia & Zanaj, Skerdilajda, 2020. "Environmental Culture and Economic Complexity," MPRA Paper 105067, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Bernardo Caldarola & Dario Mazzilli & Lorenzo Napolitano & Aurelio Patelli & Angelica Sbardella, 2023. "Economic complexity and the sustainability transition: A review of data, methods, and literature," Papers 2308.07172, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    16. Isaac Ketu & Arsene Mouongue Kelly & Jules-Eric Tchapchet Tchouto, 2024. "Does economic complexity reduce the size of the shadow economy in African countries?," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, January.
    17. PUGLIESE Emanuele & TACCHELLA Andrea, 2020. "Economic complexity for competitiveness and innovation: A novel bottom-up strategy linking global and regional capacities," JRC Research Reports JRC122086, Joint Research Centre.
    18. Perruchas, François & Consoli, Davide & Barbieri, Nicolò, 2020. "Specialisation, diversification and the ladder of green technology development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    19. Castañeda, Gonzalo & Pietronero, Luciano & Romero-Padilla, Juan & Zaccaria, Andrea, 2022. "The complex dynamic of growth: Fitness and the different patterns of economic activity in the medium and long terms," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 231-246.
    20. Vanessa Echeverri & Juan C. Duque & Daniel E. Restrepo, 2021. "Identifying poverty traps based on the network structure of economic output," Papers 2108.05488, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0211038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.