IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0119673.html

Using Data-Driven Model-Brain Mappings to Constrain Formal Models of Cognition

Author

Listed:
  • Jelmer P Borst
  • Menno Nijboer
  • Niels A Taatgen
  • Hedderik van Rijn
  • John R Anderson

Abstract

In this paper we propose a method to create data-driven mappings from components of cognitive models to brain regions. Cognitive models are notoriously hard to evaluate, especially based on behavioral measures alone. Neuroimaging data can provide additional constraints, but this requires a mapping from model components to brain regions. Although such mappings can be based on the experience of the modeler or on a reading of the literature, a formal method is preferred to prevent researcher-based biases. In this paper we used model-based fMRI analysis to create a data-driven model-brain mapping for five modules of the ACT-R cognitive architecture. We then validated this mapping by applying it to two new datasets with associated models. The new mapping was at least as powerful as an existing mapping that was based on the literature, and indicated where the models were supported by the data and where they have to be improved. We conclude that data-driven model-brain mappings can provide strong constraints on cognitive models, and that model-based fMRI is a suitable way to create such mappings.

Suggested Citation

  • Jelmer P Borst & Menno Nijboer & Niels A Taatgen & Hedderik van Rijn & John R Anderson, 2015. "Using Data-Driven Model-Brain Mappings to Constrain Formal Models of Cognition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0119673
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119673
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119673&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0119673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menno Nijboer & Niels A Taatgen & Annelies Brands & Jelmer P Borst & Hedderik van Rijn, 2013. "Decision Making in Concurrent Multitasking: Do People Adapt to Task Interference?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Nathaniel D. Daw & John P. O'Doherty & Peter Dayan & Ben Seymour & Raymond J. Dolan, 2006. "Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7095), pages 876-879, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongping Bao & Ludwig Danwitz & Fabian Dvorak & Sebastian Fehrler & Lars Hornuf & Hsuan Yu Lin & Bettina von Helversen, 2022. "Similarity and Consistency in Algorithm-Guided Exploration," CESifo Working Paper Series 10188, CESifo.
    2. Peter S. Riefer & Bradley C. Love, 2015. "Unfazed by Both the Bull and Bear: Strategic Exploration in Dynamic Environments," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, August.
    3. Makoto Naruse & Eiji Yamamoto & Takashi Nakao & Takuma Akimoto & Hayato Saigo & Kazuya Okamura & Izumi Ojima & Georg Northoff & Hirokazu Hori, 2018. "Why is the environment important for decision making? Local reservoir model for choice-based learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Ziang Liu & Zhuangyi Jiang & Li Shi & Fang Fang & Shiming Tang & Yang Zhou, 2025. "Neural correlates of trial outcome monitoring during long-term learning in primate posterior parietal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Christian P Janssen & Emma Everaert & Heleen M A Hendriksen & Ghislaine L Mensing & Laura J Tigchelaar & Hendrik Nunner, 2019. "The influence of rewards on (sub-)optimal interleaving," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Frédéric Ooms & Jitka Annen & Rajanikant Panda & Paul Meunier & Luaba Tshibanda & Steven Laureys & Jeffrey M. Pollack & Bernard Surlemont, 2024. "Advancing (Neuro)Entrepreneurship Cognition Research Through Resting-State fMRI: A Methodological Brief," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(2), pages 719-741, March.
    7. Jeremy Gordon & Flavio Chierichetti & Alessandro Panconesi & Giovanni Pezzulo, 2023. "Information foraging with an oracle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Christina Fang & Daniel Levinthal, 2009. "Near-Term Liability of Exploitation: Exploration and Exploitation in Multistage Problems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 538-551, June.
    9. Shawn A. Rhoads & Lin Gan & Kathryn Berluti & Katherine O’Connell & Jo Cutler & Patricia L. Lockwood & Abigail A. Marsh, 2025. "Neurocomputational basis of learning when choices simultaneously affect both oneself and others," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Elise Payzan-LeNestour & Peter Bossaerts, 2011. "Risk, Unexpected Uncertainty, and Estimation Uncertainty: Bayesian Learning in Unstable Settings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Nancy Garon & Ellen Doucet & Bronwyn Inness, 2024. "Decomposing decision-making in preschoolers: Making decisions under ambiguity versus risk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-31, September.
    12. Ian Krajbich & Todd Hare & Björn Bartling & Yosuke Morishima & Ernst Fehr, 2015. "A Common Mechanism Underlying Food Choice and Social Decisions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Bossaerts, P., 2026. "Decision-Making when Computational Complexity Drives Uncertainty," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2611, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    14. Maël Lebreton & Karin Bacily & Stefano Palminteri & Jan B Engelmann, 2019. "Contextual influence on confidence judgments in human reinforcement learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, April.
    15. Li Xin Lim & Rei Akaishi & Sébastien Hélie, 2025. "Memory Constraints in Uncertainty Misestimation: A Computational Model of Working Memory and Environmental Change Detection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-33, July.
    16. Beren Millidge & Mufeng Tang & Mahyar Osanlouy & Nicol S Harper & Rafal Bogacz, 2024. "Predictive coding networks for temporal prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-31, April.
    17. Christian P Janssen & Duncan P Brumby, 2015. "Strategic Adaptation to Task Characteristics, Incentives, and Individual Differences in Dual-Tasking," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-32, July.
    18. Ahmed H. Alsharif & Nor Zafir Md Salleh & Rohaizat Baharun & Alharthi Rami Hashem E & Aida Azlina Mansor & Javed Ali & Alhamzah F. Abbas, 2021. "Neuroimaging Techniques in Advertising Research: Main Applications, Development, and Brain Regions and Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    19. Aaron J Gruber & Rifat J Hussain & Patricio O'Donnell, 2009. "The Nucleus Accumbens: A Switchboard for Goal-Directed Behaviors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-10, April.
    20. Phanish Puranam & Murali Swamy, 2016. "How Initial Representations Shape Coupled Learning Processes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 323-335, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0119673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.