IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0065316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decay of Impact after Self-Management Education for People with Chronic Illnesses: Changes in Anxiety and Depression over One Year

Author

Listed:
  • M J Park
  • Joseph Green
  • Hirono Ishikawa
  • Yoshihiko Yamazaki
  • Akira Kitagawa
  • Miho Ono
  • Fumiko Yasukata
  • Takahiro Kiuchi

Abstract

Background: In people with chronic illnesses, self-management education can reduce anxiety and depression. Those benefits, however, decay over time. Efforts have been made to prevent or minimize that “decay of impact”, but they have not been based on information about the decay’s characteristics, and they have failed. Here we show how the decay’s basic characteristics (prevalence, timing, and magnitude) can be quantified. Regarding anxiety and depression, we also report the prevalence, timing, and magnitude of the decay. Methods: Adults with various chronic conditions participated in a self-management educational program (n = 369). Data were collected with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale four times over one year. Using within-person effect sizes, we defined decay of impact as a decline of ≥0.5 standard deviations after improvement by at least the same amount. We also interpret the results using previously-set criteria for non-cases, possible cases, and probable cases. Results: Prevalence: On anxiety, decay occurred in 19% of the participants (70/369), and on depression it occurred in 24% (90/369). Timing: In about one third of those with decay, it began 3 months after the baseline measurement (6 weeks after the educational program ended). Magnitude: The median magnitudes of decay on anxiety and on depression were both 4 points, which was about 1 standard deviation. Early in the follow-up year, many participants with decay moved into less severe clinical categories (e.g., becoming non-cases). Later, many of them moved into more severe categories (e.g., becoming probable cases). Conclusions: Decay of impact can be identified and quantified from within-person effect sizes. This decay occurs in about one fifth or more of this program’s participants. It can start soon after the program ends, and it is large enough to be clinically important. These findings can be used to plan interventions aimed at preventing or minimizing the decay of impact.

Suggested Citation

  • M J Park & Joseph Green & Hirono Ishikawa & Yoshihiko Yamazaki & Akira Kitagawa & Miho Ono & Fumiko Yasukata & Takahiro Kiuchi, 2013. "Decay of Impact after Self-Management Education for People with Chronic Illnesses: Changes in Anxiety and Depression over One Year," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0065316
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065316
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065316&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0065316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elzen, Henrike & Slaets, Joris P.J. & Snijders, Tom A.B. & Steverink, Nardi, 2007. "Evaluation of the chronic disease self-management program (CDSMP) among chronically ill older people in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(9), pages 1832-1841, May.
    2. Lorig, Kate & Holman, Halsted R., 1989. "Long-term outcomes of an arthritis self-management study: Effects of reinforcement efforts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 221-224, January.
    3. Smith, Lorraine & Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia Z. & Mitchell, Bernadette & Saini, Bandana & Krass, Ines & Armour, Carol, 2007. "Treating asthma with a self-management model of illness behaviour in an Australian community pharmacy setting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 1501-1511, April.
    4. Green, L.W., 1977. "Evaluation and measurement: some dilemmas for health education," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 67(2), pages 155-161.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven Paul Schinke & Lewayne D. Gilchrist & Deborah Lodish & Janet Kay Bobo, 1983. "Strategies for Prevention Research in Service Environments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 7(1), pages 126-136, February.
    2. Jarmila Šebestová & Kateřina Nowáková, 2013. "Dynamic strategy for sustainable business development: mania or hazard?," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(34), pages 442-454, June.
    3. Ilona van de Kolk & Sanne M. P. L. Gerards & Lisa S. E. Harms & Stef P. J. Kremers & Angela M. H. S. van Dinther-Erkens & Monique Snellings & Jessica S. Gubbels, 2020. "Study Protocol for the Evaluation of “SuperFIT”, a Multicomponent Nutrition and Physical Activity Intervention Approach for Preschools and Families," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. de Bruin, Simone R. & Versnel, Nathalie & Lemmens, Lidwien C. & Molema, Claudia C.M. & Schellevis, François G. & Nijpels, Giel & Baan, Caroline A., 2012. "Comprehensive care programs for patients with multiple chronic conditions: A systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 108-145.
    5. Rilana Prenger & Marcel E. Pieterse & Louise M. A. Braakman‐Jansen & Talitha L. Feenstra & Eline S. Smit & Ciska Hoving & Hein de Vries & Jan‐Kees van Ommeren & Silvia M. A. A. Evers & Job van der Pal, 2016. "Dealing With Missing Behavioral Endpoints in Health Promotion Research by Modeling Cognitive Parameters in Cost‐Effectiveness Analyses of Behavioral Interventions: A Validation Study," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(1), pages 24-39, January.
    6. Jay Cross & Cynthia Saunders & Debra Bartelli, 1998. "The Effectiveness of Educational and Needle Exchange Programs: A Meta-analysis of HIV Prevention Strategies for Injecting Drug Users," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 165-180, May.
    7. Jill Berg & Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob & Susan M. Sereika, 1997. "An Evaluation of a Self-Management Program for Adults with Asthma," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 6(3), pages 225-238, August.
    8. Rilana Prenger & Marcel Pieterse & Louise Braakman-Jansen & Job Palen & Lieke Christenhusz & Erwin Seydel, 2013. "Moving beyond a limited follow-up in cost-effectiveness analyses of behavioral interventions," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(2), pages 297-306, April.
    9. Jarmila Šebestová, 2011. "Entrepreneurship within health care - a dilemma of identity and profession," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 423-430.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0065316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.