IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0009829.html

The Unbearable Lightness of Health Science Reporting: A Week Examining Italian Print Media

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Iaboli
  • Luana Caselli
  • Angelina Filice
  • Gianpaolo Russi
  • Eleonora Belletti

Abstract

Background: Although being an important source of science news information to the public, print news media have often been criticized in their credibility. Health-related content of press media articles has been examined by many studies underlining that information about benefits, risks and costs are often incomplete or inadequate and financial conflicts of interest are rarely reported. However, these studies have focused their analysis on very selected science articles. The present research aimed at adopting a wider explorative approach, by analysing all types of health science information appearing on the Italian national press in one-week period. Moreover, we attempted to score the balance of the articles. Methodology/Principal Findings: We collected 146 health science communication articles defined as articles aiming at improving the reader's knowledge on health from a scientific perspective. Articles were evaluated by 3 independent physicians with respect to different divulgation parameters: benefits, costs, risks, sources of information, disclosure of financial conflicts of interest and balance. Balance was evaluated with regard to exaggerated or non correct claims. The selected articles appeared on 41 Italian national daily newspapers and 41 weekly magazines, representing 89% of national circulation copies: 97 articles (66%) covered common medical treatments or basic scientific research and 49 (34%) were about new medical treatments, procedures, tests or products. We found that only 6/49 (12%) articles on new treatments, procedures, tests or products mentioned costs or risks to patients. Moreover, benefits were always maximized and in 16/49 cases (33%) they were presented in relative rather than absolute terms. The majority of stories (133/146, 91%) did not report any financial conflict of interest. Among these, 15 were shown to underreport them (15/146, 9.5%), as we demonstrated that conflicts of interest did actually exist. Unbalanced articles were 27/146 (18%). Specifically, the probability of unbalanced reporting was significantly increased in stories about a new treatment, procedure, test or product (22/49, 45%), compared to stories covering common treatments or basic scientific research (5/97, 5%) (risk ratio, 8.72). Conclusions/Significance: Consistent with prior research on health science communication in other countries, we report undisclosed costs and risks, emphasized benefits, unrevealed financial conflicts of interest and exaggerated claims in Italian print media. In addition, we show that the risk for a story about a new medical approach to be unbalanced is almost 9 times higher with respect to stories about any other kind of health science-related topics. These findings raise again the fundamental issue whether popular media is detrimental rather than useful to public health.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Iaboli & Luana Caselli & Angelina Filice & Gianpaolo Russi & Eleonora Belletti, 2010. "The Unbearable Lightness of Health Science Reporting: A Week Examining Italian Print Media," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-6, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0009829
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0009829
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0009829&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0009829?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Schwitzer & Ganapati Mudur & David Henry & Amanda Wilson & Merrill Goozner & Maria Simbra & Melissa Sweet & Katherine A Baverstock, 2005. "What Are the Roles and Responsibilities of the Media in Disseminating Health Information?," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(7), pages 1-1, July.
    2. Kevin P Weinfurt & Damon M Seils & Janice P Tzeng & Li Lin & Kevin A Schulman & Robert M Califf, 2008. "Consistency of Financial Interest Disclosures in the Biomedical Literature: The Case of Coronary Stents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-7, May.
    3. Gary Schwitzer, 2008. "How Do US Journalists Cover Treatments, Tests, Products, and Procedures? An Evaluation of 500 Stories," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-5, May.
    4. G Michael Allan & Joel Lexchin & Natasha Wiebe, 2007. "Physician Awareness of Drug Cost: A Systematic Review," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(9), pages 1-11, September.
    5. Judith Covey, 2007. "A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Presenting Treatment Benefits in Different Formats," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 27(5), pages 638-654, September.
    6. Daniel M Cook & Elizabeth A Boyd & Claudia Grossmann & Lisa A Bero, 2007. "Reporting Science and Conflicts of Interest in the Lay Press," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(12), pages 1-5, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph W Taylor & Marie Long & Elizabeth Ashley & Alex Denning & Beatrice Gout & Kayleigh Hansen & Thomas Huws & Leifa Jennings & Sinead Quinn & Patrick Sarkies & Alex Wojtowicz & Philip M Newton, 2015. "When Medical News Comes from Press Releases—A Case Study of Pancreatic Cancer and Processed Meat," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Maike Winters & Anna Larsson & Jan Kowalski & Carl Johan Sundberg, 2019. "The association between quality measures of medical university press releases and their corresponding news stories—Important information missing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Tinglong Dai & Xiaofang Wang & Chao-Wei Hwang, 2022. "Clinical Ambiguity and Conflicts of Interest in Interventional Cardiology Decision Making," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 864-882, March.
    4. Alemayehu Demissie & Levenstein Marcia, 2011. "Toward a Pragmatic Policy on Authorship," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Michael T M Wang & Mark J Bolland & Greg Gamble & Andrew Grey, 2015. "Media Coverage, Journal Press Releases and Editorials Associated with Randomized and Observational Studies in High-Impact Medical Journals: A Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-6, December.
    6. Michelle Nelson & Jiwoo Park, 2015. "Publicity as Covert Marketing? The Role of Persuasion Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions on Beliefs and Credibility in a Video News Release Story," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 327-341, August.
    7. Mousnad, Mohamed Awad & Shafie, Asrul Akmal & Ibrahim, Mohamed Izham, 2014. "Systematic review of factors affecting pharmaceutical expenditures," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 137-146.
    8. Brian J Piper & Hassenet M Telku & Drew A Lambert, 2015. "A Quantitative Analysis of Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest in Pharmacology Textbooks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-9, July.
    9. Fraeyman, Jessica & Symons, Linda & De Loof, Hans & De Meyer, Guido R.Y. & Remmen, Roy & Beutels, Philippe & Van Hal, Guido, 2015. "Medicine price awareness in chronic patients in Belgium," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 217-223.
    10. repec:plo:pone00:0028437 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Susan L Norris & Haley K Holmer & Lauren A Ogden & Brittany U Burda & Rongwei Fu, 2013. "Conflicts of Interest among Authors of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-1, October.
    12. repec:plo:pone00:0006103 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Lutz Peschke & Seyedehshahrzad Seyfafjehi & Irmak Dündar & Yasemin Gümüş Ağca, 2024. "Analyzing Media Content in Turkiye and the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic Considering the Dimensions of Quadruple Helix Collaboration Processes," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Fadi El-Jardali & Lama Bou Karroum & Lamya Bawab & Ola Kdouh & Farah El-Sayed & Hala Rachidi & Malak Makki, 2015. "Health Reporting in Print Media in Lebanon: Evidence, Quality and Role in Informing Policymaking," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    15. G Michael Allan & Christina Korownyk & Kate LaSalle & Ben Vandermeer & Victoria Ma & Douglas Klein & Donna Manca, 2010. "Do Randomized Controlled Trials Discuss Healthcare Costs?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-5, August.
    16. Gauri Billa & Karan Thakkar & Sarita Jaiswar & Dinesh Dhodi, 2014. "A Cross-Sectional Study to Evaluate the Awareness and Attitudes of Physicians Towards Reducing the Cost of Prescription Drugs, Mumbai," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 125-137, April.
    17. Gabe, Jonathan & Chamberlain, Kerry & Norris, Pauline & Dew, Kevin & Madden, Helen & Hodgetts, Darrin, 2012. "The debate about the funding of Herceptin: A case study of ‘countervailing powers’," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(12), pages 2353-2361.
    18. Barkowski, Scott, 2021. "Physician Response to Prices of Other Physicians: Evidence from a Field Experiment," MPRA Paper 108966, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Garcia-Retamero, Rocio & Hoffrage, Ulrich, 2013. "Visual representation of statistical information improves diagnostic inferences in doctors and their patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 27-33.
    20. Stefanie Heinzle, 2012. "Disclosure of Energy Operating Cost Information: A Silver Bullet for Overcoming the Energy-Efficiency Gap?," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 43-64, March.
    21. Celia Andreu-Sánchez & Miguel Ángel Martín-Pascual, 2022. "Scientific illustrations of SARS-CoV-2 in the media: An imagedemic on screens," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-6, December.
    22. repec:plo:pone00:0203800 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Lexchin, Joel, 2009. "Pricing of multiple dosage prescription medications: An analysis of the Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 142-147, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0009829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.