IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0011139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving understanding of disease control implementation research through a mooc with participants from low- and middle-income countries: Evaluating participant reactions and learning

Author

Listed:
  • Adanna Nwameme
  • Phyllis Dako-Gyeke
  • Emmanuel Asampong
  • Pascale Allotey
  • Daniel D Reidpath
  • Edith Certain
  • Mahnaz Vahedi
  • Bella Ross
  • Dermot Maher
  • Pascal Launois

Abstract

The Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases developed a massive open online course (MOOC) on implementation research with a focus on infectious diseases of poverty (IDPs) to reinforce the explanation of implementation research concepts through real case studies. The target MOOC participant group included public health officers, researchers and students. By reshaping institutions and building resilience in communities and systems, implementation research will allow progress towards universal health coverage and sustainable development goals. This study evaluates learners’ knowledge in implementation research after completing the MOOC using anonymous exit survey responses. Of the almost 4000 enrolled in the two sessions of the MOOC in 2018, about 30% completed all five modules and the assessments, and were awarded certificates. The majority of the participants were early to mid-career professionals, under the age of 40, and from low- and middle-income countries. They were slightly more likely to be men (56%) with a Bachelor or a Master’s degree. Participants were public health researchers (45%), public health officers (11%) or students (11%). On completion of the course, an exit survey revealed that 80.9% of respondents indicated significant improvement to strong and very strong implementation research knowledge. This evaluation clearly shows the usefulness of the MOOC on implementation research for reaching out to field researchers and public health practitioners who are facing problems in the implementation of control programmes in low- and middle-income countries.Author summary: Implementation research (IR) focuses on how to improve access to, and distribution and use of disease control interventions, which are under-utilised in many low- and middle-income countries. Effective implementation of disease control interventions can have significant impacts by reducing illness and mortality. Despite this, IR is not widely recognised, researched or taught. Education and training in IR is not readily available or accessible and, for this reason, Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) developed a massive open online course (MOOC) on the topic of IR with a focus on infectious diseases of poverty (IDPs). A MOOC is a free online course that anyone can participate in and can provide training and education to large audiences of learners. A MOOC may consist of online media, short videos, lectures, case studies, quizzes and other assessments, online discussion forums, and readings. The TDR IR MOOC targeted field researchers and public health practitioners facing problems in the implementation of control programmes in low- and middle-income countries and was open to anyone who was interested. In this study, we explore the demographics of those who registered for, participated in, and completed the MOOC, and whether the MOOC increased their knowledge of the topic. Findings reveal that registrants were most commonly from the WHO African region, were English language speakers and public health researchers. The MOOC was found to be successful in increasing learners’ knowledge in implementation research.

Suggested Citation

  • Adanna Nwameme & Phyllis Dako-Gyeke & Emmanuel Asampong & Pascale Allotey & Daniel D Reidpath & Edith Certain & Mahnaz Vahedi & Bella Ross & Dermot Maher & Pascal Launois, 2023. "Improving understanding of disease control implementation research through a mooc with participants from low- and middle-income countries: Evaluating participant reactions and learning," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011139
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011139&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lois Orton & Ffion Lloyd-Williams & David Taylor-Robinson & Martin O'Flaherty & Simon Capewell, 2011. "The Use of Research Evidence in Public Health Decision Making Processes: Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Grace Fobi & Laurent Yameogo & Mounkaila Noma & Yaovi Aholou & Joseph B Koroma & Honorat M Zouré & Tony Ukety & Paul-Samson Lusamba-Dikassa & Chris Mwikisa & Daniel A Boakye & Jean-Baptist Roungou, 2015. "Managing the Fight against Onchocerciasis in Africa: APOC Experience," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-9, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paula Hooper & Sarah Foster & Billie Giles-Corti, 2019. "A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the ‘Research into Policy’ and ‘Evidence-Based Policy’ Gap for Active-Living Science," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Hassan, S. & Thompson, C. & Adams, J. & Chang, M. & Derbyshire, D. & Keeble, M. & Liu, B. & Mytton, O.T. & Rahilly, J. & Savory, B. & Smith, R. & White, M. & Burgoine, T. & Cummins, S., 2024. "The adoption and implementation of local government planning policy to manage hot food takeaways near schools in England: A qualitative process evaluation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    3. Nancy Li & Markus Luczak-Roesch & Flavia Donadelli, 2023. "A computational approach to study the gap and barriers between science and policy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 15-29.
    4. Cyr, Pascale Renée & Jain, Vageesh & Chalkidou, Kalipso & Ottersen, Trygve & Gopinathan, Unni, 2021. "Evaluations of public health interventions produced by health technology assessment agencies: A mapping review and analysis by type and evidence content," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(8), pages 1054-1064.
    5. Matthew Calver, 2016. "Measuring the Appropriate Outcomes for Better Decision-Making: A Framework to Guide the Analysis of Health Policy," CSLS Research Reports 2016-03, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    6. Courtney A. Cuthbertson & Don E. Albrecht & Scott Loveridge, 2017. "Rural versus urban perspectives on behavioral health issues and priorities," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 515-526, August.
    7. Christian Tetteh Duamor & Fabrice Roberto Datchoua-Poutcheu & Winston Patrick Chounna Ndongmo & Aldof Tah Yoah & Ernest Njukang & Emmanuel Kah & Mary Sheena Maingeh & Jonas Arnaud Kengne-Ouaffo & Dizz, 2017. "Programmatic factors associated with the limited impact of Community-Directed Treatment with Ivermectin to control Onchocerciasis in three drainage basins of South West Cameroon," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Heather Munthe‐Kaas & Heid Nøkleby & Sarah Rosenbaum, 2022. "User experiences of structured stakeholder engagement to consider transferability: The TRANSFER approach," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), December.
    9. Pierre-Olivier Bédard, 2015. "The Mobilization of Scientific Evidence by Public Policy Analysts," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(3), pages 21582440156, September.
    10. Edwards, Rachael C. & Kneale, Dylan & Stansfield, Claire & Lester, Sarah, 2024. "What are the mechanisms driving the early stages of embedded researcher interventions? A qualitative process evaluation in English local government," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    11. Pauline Zardo & Adrian G Barnett & Nicolas Suzor & Tim Cahill, 2018. "Does engagement predict research use? An analysis of The Conversation Annual Survey 2016," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Zardo, Pauline & Collie, Alex & Livingstone, Charles, 2014. "External factors affecting decision-making and use of evidence in an Australian public health policy environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 120-127.
    13. El-Jardali, Fadi & Bou-Karroum, Lama & Ataya, Nour & El-Ghali, Hana Addam & Hammoud, Rawan, 2014. "A retrospective health policy analysis of the development and implementation of the voluntary health insurance system in Lebanon: Learning from failure," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 45-54.
    14. Olariu Ana Alexandra & Breazu Andreea & Popa Ștefan Cătălin & Popa Cătălina Florentina & Căruceru Nicoleta, 2024. "Decision-Making in Healthcare. A Bibliometric Exploration," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 3242-3254.
    15. P Th Houngbo & H L S Coleman & M Zweekhorst & Tj De Cock Buning & D Medenou & J F G Bunders, 2017. "A Model for Good Governance of Healthcare Technology Management in the Public Sector: Learning from Evidence-Informed Policy Development and Implementation in Benin," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Natasa Loncarevic & Pernille Tanggaard Andersen & Anja Leppin & Maja Bertram, 2021. "Policymakers’ Research Capacities, Engagement, and Use of Research in Public Health Policymaking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-17, October.
    17. R Constance Wiener & Christopher Waters & Ruchi Bhandari, 2024. "A theory of oral healthcare decision-making in Appalachia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-11, May.
    18. Dagenais, Christian & Dupont, Didier & Brière, Frédéric N. & Mena, Diego & Yale-Soulière, Gabrielle & Mc Sween-Cadieux, Esther, 2020. "Codifying explicit and tacit practitioner knowledge in community social pediatrics organizations: Evaluation of the first step of a knowledge transfer strategy," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Richard A. Sharpe & Tim Taylor & Lora E. Fleming & Karyn Morrissey & George Morris & Rachel Wigglesworth, 2018. "Making the Case for “Whole System” Approaches: Integrating Public Health and Housing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Schwarzman, Joanna & Bauman, Adrian & Gabbe, Belinda J. & Rissel, Chris & Shilton, Trevor & Smith, Ben J., 2022. "How practitioner, organisational and system-level factors act to influence health promotion evaluation capacity: Validation of a conceptual framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.