IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0001416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress and resilience during pregnancy: A comparative study between pregnant and non-pregnant women in Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Mubarek Abera
  • Charlotte Hanlon
  • Hikma Fedlu
  • Mary Fewtrell
  • Markos Tesfaye
  • Jonathan C K Wells

Abstract

Background: Stress during pregnancy is associated with perturbances in maternal psychology and physiology, and results in adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. However, little attention has been given to understand maternal stress and its potential negative consequences in many low- and middle-income countries. We aimed to investigate whether pregnancy is associated with greater stress and lower psychological resilience among women living in Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia. Method: An institution-based comparative cross-sectional study design was implemented in Jimma University Medical Center and Jimma health centers from 15 September to 30 November 2021. Women attending antenatal care and family planning services were invited to participate in the study. Participants were interviewed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), distress questionnaire-5, and the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS). Linear regression analysis was used to test associations between pregnancy (exposure) and outcomes of interest (stress and resilience scores), while adjusting for potential confounders. Stress and resilience were mutually adjusted for one another in the final model. Results: A total of 166 pregnant and 154 non-pregnant women participated, with mean age of 27.0 SD 5.0 and 29.5 SD 5.3 years respectively. Pregnancy was associated with increased stress score by 4.1 points (β = 4.1; 95% CI: 3.0, 5.2), and with reduced resilience by 3.3 points (β = -3.3; 95% CI: -4.5, -2.2) in a fully adjusted model. In mutually-adjusted models, pregnancy was independently associated with greater stress (β = 2.9, 95% CI 1.8, 3.9) and lower resilience (β = -1.3, 95% CI: -2.5, -0.2) compared to non-pregnant women. Conclusion: In this low income setting, pregnancy is associated with greater vulnerability in the mental health of women, characterized by greater perceived stress and diminished resilience. Context-relevant interventions to improve resilience and reduce stress could help improve the health and wellbeing of mothers, with potential benefits for their offspring.

Suggested Citation

  • Mubarek Abera & Charlotte Hanlon & Hikma Fedlu & Mary Fewtrell & Markos Tesfaye & Jonathan C K Wells, 2023. "Stress and resilience during pregnancy: A comparative study between pregnant and non-pregnant women in Ethiopia," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001416
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001416
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0001416&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiara Mussida & Raffaella Patimo, 2021. "Women’s Family Care Responsibilities, Employment and Health: A Tale of Two Countries," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 489-507, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reljic, Jelena & Zezza, Francesco, 2025. "Breaking the divide: Can public spending on social infrastructure boost female employment in Italy?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Andreia Teixeira & Ronaldo Gabriel & José Martinho & Irene Oliveira & Mário Santos & Graça Pinto & Helena Moreira, 2023. "Distance to Natural Environments, Physical Activity, Sleep, and Body Composition in Women: An Exploratory Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Thanuja Wijesiri & Gayanthi Ilangarathna & Wathsala Dedunupitiya & Janaka Ekanayake & Sakunthala Yatigammana & Mallika Pinnawala & Ganga Thilakarathne & Roshan Godaliyadda & Parakrama Ekanayake, 2023. "The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Women in the Households: Qualitative Analysis of Women’s Quality of Life and Mental Health," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(4), pages 610-622, April.
    4. Adá-Lameiras, Alba & Antonovica, Arta & de Esteban Curiel, Javier & Aydogan, Merve, 2024. "The impact of health crisis on sports consumption – A longitudinal study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Sieber, Stefan & Orsholits, Dan & Cheval, Boris & Ihle, Andreas & Kelly-Irving, Michelle & Delpierre, Cyrille & Burton-Jeangros, Claudine & Cullati, Stéphane, 2022. "Social protection expenditure on health in later life in 20 European countries: Spending more to reduce health inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    6. Antonio Gattamelata & Maria Elisabetta Coccia & Giulia Fioravanti & Vanessa Prisca Zurkirch & Nieves Moyano, 2025. "Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Childbearing Motivations Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(2), pages 1-21, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0001416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.